For an explanation of why the case was closed, see the talk page. The case was closed at 04:31, 16 July 2011 (UTC).. If mediation of this case again becomes necessary, a new request should be filed.
Click 'show' to view full details of the closed case
The actual mediation proceedings are on the talk page attached to this request. Please do not modify those discussions or this page.
All aspects of article content over which there is disagreement should be listed here. The filing party should define the scope under "Primary issues", which is used to frame the case; other parties to the dispute can list other issues under "Additional issues", and can contest the primary issues on the case talk page.
Issue 1: these two editors have been edit warring, they've reverted each other more than 20 times over the last few days and have shown that they don't intend to stop
All parties please indicate below whether they agree to mediation of this dispute; remember to sign your post. Extended comments should be made on the case talk page. Every party listed above will be automatically notified that this request has been filed.
A member of the Mediation Committee will indicate whether this request is to be accepted or rejected. Notes concerning the request and questions to the parties may also be posed by a committee member in this section.
Accept. This is a rather simple case, but the MedCom does not have a heavy caseload at the moment so we can probably help here. The IP address was barely involved and has probably been re-assigned to another user, so I am ignoring his involvement as a party. For the Mediation Committee, AGK [•] 10:19, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I've agreed to take this case. Sunray (talk) 00:00, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]