Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Juan Manuel de Rosas

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Juan Manuel de Rosas

[edit]
Formal mediation case
ArticleJuan Manuel de Rosas (talk
MediatorPhilKnight (talk)
StatusAwaiting party agreement
NotesNone
Users involved in dispute
  1. Lecen (talk · contribs), filing party
  2. Cambalachero (talk · contribs)
Articles concerned in this dispute
Other steps of dispute resolution that have been attempted

Issues to be mediated

[edit]
Primary issues
Additional issues (added by other parties)
  • Additional issue 1
  • Additional issue 2

Parties' agreement to mediation

[edit]

All parties please indicate below whether they agree to mediation of this dispute; remember to sign your post. Extended comments should be made on case talk page. Every party listed above will be automatically notified that this request has been filed.

  1. Agree. Lecen (talk) 14:36, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Agree. Cambalachero (talk) 01:29, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Decision of the Mediation Committee

[edit]

A member of the Mediation Committee will indicate whether this request is to be accepted or rejected. Notes concerning the request and questions to the parties may also be posed by a committee member in this section.

I am recused on this request and any subsequent mediation which may result from it. — TransporterMan (TALK) 18:04, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • I'm sorry but I will have to decline taking part in this discussion for the time being. I'm very busy in real life right now, and I don't know when will I have free time again. As you may notice in my contributions, I have not edited since weeks, except for passing-by comments or edits at 2:00 in the morning (which is when I finish my current tasks and distract a little before going to sleep). Initially I thought I could manage both the things I'm doing and editing in wikipedia, but unfortunately that's not the case. I do not want to have everybody sitting and waiting for my replies, and I apologize if that was the case so far. As for the article, well, if by the time I return there is still interest in discussing about it, then we may begin talking again. Cambalachero (talk) 05:41, 29 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]