Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/List of countries by median wage

List of countries by median wage

The filing party (the editor who opened this request) will add the basic details for this dispute below.

Editors involved in this dispute

1. Jeine091 (talk · contribs) – filing party
2. Lneal001 (talk · contribs)

Articles affected by this dispute

1. List of countries by median wage

Other attempts at resolving this dispute that you have attempted

• Talk:Balloon#I disagree with this edit

Issues to be mediated

Primary issues (added by the filing party)

1. We can't agree on whether calculating median wages from the OECD data considered original research, or not.
2. Also, the user insists on using tax calculators for deriving net wages which he/she continues to use even while it was admitted before that it was a violation.

I just thought that it's normal here to use tax calculators for the articles. They are used in several articles about european and american average wages, and nobody said that it was an OR violation. Jeune091 (talk) 20:53, 16 July 2017 (UTC)

Parties' agreement to mediation

If you are a named party, please sign below and indicate whether you agree or refuse to participate in mediation. Remember that all editors are obliged to resolve disputes about content through discussion, mediation, or other similar means. If you do not wish to participate in mediation, you must arrange another form of dispute resolution. Comments and questions should be made underneath the numbered list below, to avoid confusion.

1. Agree. Jeune091 (talk) 16:47, 16 July 2017 (UTC)
2. Agree. Lneal001 (talk) 18:53, 16 July 2017 (UTC)

Decision of the Mediation Committee

This section should only be edited by a mediator. The Mediation Committee's representative will indicate in due course whether the request is accepted (meaning a mediator will be assigned) or rejected (meaning you will have to try a different type of dispute resolution). If the mediator asks you a question in this section, you may edit here.

• Reject: I'm going to reject this one in accordance with prerequisite to mediation #9, that the chairperson "has the discretion to refuse or refer back to other dispute resolution venues (e.g. dispute resolution noticeboard, third opinion, request for comment, or additional talk page discussion) a dispute which would benefit from additional work at lower levels of the dispute resolution process". This should go to Third Opinion and/or DRN before coming here, though a trip to the original research noticeboard might be in order even before those steps. If those processes fail to end the dispute, this case may be refiled. For the Mediation Committee, TransporterMan (TALK) 23:23, 16 July 2017 (UTC) (Chairperson)