Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for page protection

Page semi-protected
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
"WP:RFP" and "WP:RPP" redirect here. You may also be looking for Wikipedia:Requests for permissions, Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission, or Wikipedia:Random page patrol.
    Welcome—request protection of a page, file, or template here.
    Shortcuts

    Before requesting, read the protection policy. Full protection is used to stop edit warring between multiple users or to prevent vandalism to high-risk templates; semi-protection and pending changes are usually used to prevent IP and new user vandalism (see the rough guide to semi-protection); and move protection is used to stop pagemove revert wars. Extended confirmed protection is used where semi-protection has proved insufficient (see the rough guide to extended confirmed protection)

    After a page has been protected, it is listed in the page history and logs with a short rationale, and the article is listed on Special:Protectedpages. In the case of full protection due to edit warring, admins should not revert to specific versions of the page, except to get rid of obvious vandalism.

    Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level
    Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level
    Request a specific edit to a protected page
    Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here
    this header: view • edit



    Current requests for increase in protection level

    Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level
    Shortcuts

    Place requests for new or upgrading pending changes, semi-protection, full protection, move protection, create protection, template editor protection, or upload protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.


    Jonathan Davis

    Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. FMSky (talk) 22:42, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Saiful Islam (electrical engineer)

    Temporary move protection: Page title dispute/move warring. Vinegarymass911 (talk) 02:31, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    List of Illumination productions

    Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced content. Waxworker (talk) 04:18, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Seetha Raman

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continuous additions of the same unsourced information despite prior warnings to the IPs adding the information. One IP has previous block. CNMall41 (talk) 04:49, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Hrithik Roshan filmography

    Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Unsourced additions of character surnames by IPs are back after previous protection ended. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 06:24, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    3 Arts Entertainment

    Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced content. Waxworker (talk) 06:41, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Proposed states and union territories of India

    Reason: IP vandalism and probable WP:SOCK edits, removing content repeatedly, particularly a contentious subject in relation to 2023 Manipur ethnic violence. The user was warned, but same edits are being repeated from various IP addresses. Request extended page protection. Magentic Manifestations (talk) 08:05, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    BIRD Foundation

    Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Repeat hijacking from socks of Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Japansonglove. Jalen Folf (Bark[s]) 08:14, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Beirut–Rafic Hariri International Airport

    Reason: A page related to the I-P conflict need to be ECP. Currently, IPs edit warren to remove sourced information Kentucky Rain24 (talk) 11:44, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Juan Severino Mallari

    Reason: Persistent vandalism by IPs. Borgenland (talk) 12:14, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Tornado records

    Reason: Lots of reversions recently, especially from brand new editors. The Weather Event Writer (Talk Page) 13:12, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Frankie Avalon

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Hopping IP continued addition of death template to an article subjuct who is not dead, maybe a /64 block. - FlightTime (open channel) 13:23, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Vinnytsia strikes (2022–present)

    Reason: CTOP (Wikipedia:GS/RUSUKR) Hoben7599 (talk) 13:26, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Khmelnytskyi strikes (2022–present)

    Reason: CTOP (Wikipedia:GS/RUSUKR) Hoben7599 (talk) 13:27, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Collaboration with Russia during the Russian invasion of Ukraine

    Reason: CTOP (Wikipedia:GS/RUSUKR) Hoben7599 (talk) 13:28, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Ghalib

    Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated lead disruption by IPs, unlikely to abate anytime soon. A long-term semi is needed. Gotitbro (talk) 14:07, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Mario Party 8

    Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced content & unsourced date changes. Waxworker (talk) 14:44, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Claudia Sheinbaum

    Indefinite semi-protection: Very high vandalisms. Also a very high visible page. please increase the protection indefinite. MAL MALDIVE (talk) 15:36, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Current requests for reduction in protection level

    Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level
    Shortcuts

    Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin at their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.

    • To find out the username of the admin who protected the page click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page" which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
    • Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
    • Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
    • If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected please use the section below.

    Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

    Shortcuts

    Joseph Kallarangatt

    Reason: The protection is not needed as the disruptive edits by unnecessarily reverting are done by an extended confirmed user. The disruptive edits(reverting) are [1] [2] [3]. These constant and complete revertings of contributions done by multiple users prevents the improvements done to the page. That particular user is alerted in the talk page of the article and hasn't yet provided evidence to his claims. Not blanket page protection but page protection from this particular user is the one needed. അദ്വൈതൻ (talk) 16:35, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    That's not an argument for unprotection, given the BLP issues FrancisSobieski123 (talk · contribs) introduced right before the ECP. If anything, that's an argument to escalate it to full-protection until a discussion has actually run its course. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 16:39, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Reverting contributions of multiple users citing an unreliability of a citation added by one user is injustice. Already the article lacks Neutral point of View(under the section Pastoral ministry and sub section love and narcotics jihad controversy ) that too on a living person, the reverting has undid my multiple contributions too, all with reliable sources that was to address this issue. That particular user's blanket reverting has done no improvement to the page. And that user who reverted my contributions hasn't yet provided evidence to his claim in the article's talk page when asked അദ്വൈതൻ (talk) 17:13, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    You're still making a case for escalating the protection, not downgrading it. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 17:29, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    I presume you are saying about full protection because the user who is blatantly reverting is an extended confirmed+ user, correct? അദ്വൈതൻ (talk) 17:32, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Correct, and because this is a content dispute. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 17:42, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    So what the solution apart from discussing in the article's talk page. As the particular user hasn't yet replied to substantiate its claims in the talk page. അദ്വൈതൻ (talk) 17:55, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Privacy concerns with social networking services

    Reason: No puedo acceder 38.49.141.10 (talk) 00:30, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    @38.49.141.10. The page is not protected. Or are you referring to something else? -- Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:34, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Current requests for edits to a protected page

    Request a specific edit to a protected page
    Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here
    Shortcut

    Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.

    • Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among {{Edit protected}}, {{Edit template-protected}}, {{Edit extended-protected}}, or {{Edit semi-protected}} to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed.
    • Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the {{Edit COI}} template should be used.
    • Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
    • If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
    • This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.
    Further information: Wikipedia:Edit requests


    Request for Logo change on Cdiscount wiki

    Good morning, I would like to change the logo of the Cdiscount wiki page : https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cdiscount. Cdiscount has change its logo this morning. I have the new file that Cdiscount want to be displayed on the wiki page. Could you update it or unlock the page so I can make the change please. Sincerly. Cds nlv (talk) 12:37, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    The link you've provided is for French Wikipedia. This is the English Wikipedia. We have no control over that. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 12:40, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Handled requests

    A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.

    Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_page_protection&oldid=1230746033"