Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion/Archive 120

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 115 ← Archive 118 Archive 119 Archive 120 Archive 121 Archive 122 → Archive 125

Patrick M. McCarthy

I am requesting full restoration of this article's revision history.

There is a discussion, at Meta, over the problems posed by paid editors, and those with a conflict of interest. I'd like to cite problematic edits made to this article, and I can't do so, because its contribution history, has been obfuscated, for reasons I'd like to explain here, but can't really, because the explanation offered to me didn't make sense.

(1) The suppressed portion of the history of this article shows it was targeted by a series of vandals; (2) The suppressed portion of the history of this article contains this edit -- the only time I made an edit at the direct request of a public affairs officer. This is the passage I most particularly want to discuss at Meta.

How did the early revisions come to be suppressed? One of the individuals who tried blanking the article, and other forms of disruption, eventually read some wikidocuments, and nominated the article for deletion. That AFD closed as no consensus. Shortly thereafter however administrator User:CIreland deleted the article, explaining in WP:Biographies of living persons/Special enforcement log that they were asserting the authority to summarily delete the article under WP:Requests for arbitration/Badlydrawnjeff#Summary deletion of BLPs.

WP:Requests for arbitration/Badlydrawnjeff#Summary deletion of BLPs says "Any administrator, acting on their own judgment, may delete an article that is substantially a biography of a living person if they believe that it (and every previous version of it) significantly violates any aspect of the relevant policy." But, as near as I can recall, the only "policy" they were willing to state the article violated was WP:COATRACK -- which of course if not a policy, and is more often misquoted than quoted correctly. The advice of the COATRACK essay is that concerns over COATRACK should first be addressed by regular editing, and attempts at discussion, and that deletion should be a last resort.

Over on Commons village pump I sought advice about the strange claims the nominator had made on the original Talk:Patrick M. McCarthy, providing diffs to them, which are now broken, so I am also requesting a complete restoration of the talk page as well. -Geo Swan (talk) 20:44, 21 February 2014 (UTC)

 Done. According to Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Special enforcement log, the sanctions on this article have expired. I have restored the deleted contribution history. ~Amatulić (talk) 22:48, 21 February 2014 (UTC)

Heather Taves

The content of the article clearly indicated the importance and the likely notability of the subject. The article lacked references, and had been tagged to that effect, but the public accomplishments of the subject detailed in the article meant that those references were likely forthcoming in short order. The article was deleted within 1/2 hour of the speedy deletion tag being applied (overly hasty in my opinion). Please undelete so that the article creator (and I) can continue to improve the article. Please see WP:CHANCE. -Dwpaul Talk 21:54, 21 February 2014 (UTC) Dwpaul Talk 21:54, 21 February 2014 (UTC)

You need to discuss this with the deleting administrator Alexf (talk · contribs), and list the credible claims of notability that were in the article that would disqualify it from WP:CSD#A7. You might want to request him to WP:USERFY the article to your user space so you can work on it at your leisure without concern about deletion, before you move it back to main article space. ~Amatulić (talk) 22:35, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
Userfied - the page has been restored to the userspace at User:Dwpaul/Heather Taves.. -- Alexf(talk) 23:15, 21 February 2014 (UTC)

PubCon

Page is a factual, non-advertising overview of a conference with a 14-year history, citing numerous sources. -Lane R. Ellis (talk) 21:11, 21 February 2014 (UTC)

Note: The page was deleted as a result of a deletion debate. Admins will not undelete pages that were deleted with discussion here; go to WP:Deletion review or contact the administrator that closed the deletion debate instead. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 21:55, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PubCon, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Mark Arsten (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. JohnCD (talk) 21:36, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Wolf People

I, Aetavel, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Aetavel (talk) 16:15, 21 February 2014 (UTC)

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Check out WP:Your first article, WP:Notability and WP:BAND. JohnCD (talk) 21:40, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Lingua Franca Idiomas

I, 190.39.174.51, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 190.39.174.51 (talk) 21:13, 21 February 2014 (UTC)

 Not done. The article is written in Spanish, but this is the English-language Wikipedia and articles must be in English. The Spanish Wikipedia is at http://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/. Also, the article appears to be an advertisement, and Wikipedia is not for advertising or promotion, in any language.
El artículo está escrito en español, pero esto aquí es la Wikipedia en idioma inglés, y los artículos deben ser escritos en inglés. La Wikipedia en español se encuentra a http://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/. Asimismo, el artículo parece ser un anuncio. Wikipedia no es para la publicidad o la promoción, en cualquier idioma. JohnCD (talk) 22:00, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Galal Amin

I, Mgohary, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Mgohary 08:15, 23 February 2014 (UTC)

  • Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:14, 23 February 2014 (UTC)

Envision

I, Ukperch, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. I have more substantial references for this page now -Ukperch (talk) 19:32, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Note: Fixed report to point to correct title; remember that all page titles on Wikipedia are case-sensitive. If you're going to request undeletion of an AfC article you need to include the slash and everything before it. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 19:33, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:15, 23 February 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Thouless Theorem

I, Ciccio85, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Ciccio85 (talk) 19:00, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

  • Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. There still needs to be references, and using "we" is not the style here. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:21, 23 February 2014 (UTC)

buytoamerica

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Tnycman (talk) 14:40, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

This is a description of an entity company called buytoamerica.. this is by no means advertising or spam.. As many companies have a page on wikipedia we tough would be informational to have one as well..

Again, our intention is not advertizing or span, its simply informational..

Note: The page was speedily-deleted under criterion G11. Pages deleted under that criterion are generally not undeleted because they require complete rewrites to be viable encyclopedia articles or because they violate our biographical or fair-use policies. Note that "X exists, so Y should" doesn't fly as an argument. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 19:18, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Not done pure promotion from the company's point of view. Needs to be rewritten from scratch. Also needs references to show notability. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:22, 23 February 2014 (UTC)

Abdul Monem Limited

The sole purpose of this page was to only spread the general information of this highly respected and renowned company of Bangladesh that have many publicized works and have many reliable resources and references through out the internet. So I kindly request to consider the undeletion of this page -Amlbd (talk) 09:59, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Note: Of the speedy deletions this article has, the most recent deletion is a A7. Articles meeting this criterion are generally not undeleted either because they require a complete rewrite or they violate our biographical or fair-use policies. The other one is a G11. Please note that your "spread the general information" is what we call "advertising". Wikipedia is not here to spread the word. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 19:26, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

The Cutting Room Floor (wiki)

If people on this damn site could read, this wouldn't have happen. I said Please Do NOT delete and guess what, it's deleted and the reviewer is definitely stupid to see that. I WAS gonna ask an admin to move the page within my sandbox but I didn't get the time to. -Tomlamusga (talk) 14:23, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

sugaspott restoration

because at the time of deletion there was not enough resource and reference material to affirm notability. In the time that has passed since a number of reliable sources and reference materials have emerged and as such may warrant the restoration of this article. I hope to work on this article and improve it according to the guidlines and policies of the wikimedia community.

A small brief of source material applicable at discretion

Now under the extensive discussions and debates held on my talk page about this particular page it was cited that the major points causing contest for notability where that he was not played on National Radio anywhere, and where the Zimbabwean National Radio corporations have very little online resource or have no records at all, he was played on the BBC Radio channel 6Music in the UK

i guess i could go on all day but i think i should keep it short and easy to digest. -Wikispott (talk) 12:24, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

We do not accept Wikipedia (or affiliated sites such as Commons), the subject itself, blogs, or user-generated content sites as sources. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 19:20, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
And as an aside, REFUND does not undelete articles deleted because of a deletion debate. The proper venue is WP:Deletion review. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 19:23, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

thank you for pointing me in the right direction, i did not intend to use the wikipedia and wiki commons links as sources but merely as tools to put context into the current stage of the article or rather to be more concise show the only remaining history of the initial article around wikipedia, i will move over to the correct venue and start proceedings there but i was curious to know whether me putting an AfC was also a good or a bad move ? thank you very much for your assistance Wikispott (talk) 20:38, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

  •  Not done as above DP 10:35, 23 February 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Vaginal acceptance trainer

I, Wiredleicester, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Wiredleicester (talk) 22:45, 21 February 2014 (UTC)

update on topic

have been collating various medical references from nhsuk corst and bashh re proof of use in gynaecology field. Have now citation details etc and need to update the page. sorry taken a while but verification of data needed and now have approved data ready to upload to wiki re the invention nomination now recognized by Edison Awards 2012/13. important info for female health. please message me to allow uploading of new data. thanks

have been collating new medical data including nhs uk, corst, bashh and edisonaward nominee re innovative gynaecological product for womens' 21st century health. now details need uploading,because it has taken a while to compile the data in a good reading format. permission to now proceed is requested. please message me with update because data/citations need uploading, thanks

  • Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. DP 10:37, 23 February 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Ronald Masahiko Sato MD

I, Jasonespinoza89, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Jasonespinoza89 (talk) 18:51, 20 February 2014 (UTC)

 Comment: I see you have created a new version, and as it is rather fuller than the one from August last year, there is no point undeleting that one. Read WP:Your first article and WP:Notability (people) for advice. JohnCD (talk) 19:50, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
  •  Not done as above DP 10:39, 23 February 2014 (UTC)

Ernesto Treviño

I, Treviner, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Treviner (talk) 19:14, 20 February 2014 (UTC)

 Comment:: this has not yet been deleted, but it is liable for deletion because it has not been touched for over six months. If you now make any edit, even a trivial one, that will prevent immediate deletion and you will be able to work on it further. Please then edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Read WP:Your first article and WP:Notability (academics) for advice. JohnCD (talk) 20:02, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
  •  Not done as per above DP 10:39, 23 February 2014 (UTC)

tarun vyas

i am an actor of bollywood industry, and doing quite good in films, but dont know why my articles and pages getting deleted from wiki pedia, kindly put me on wikipedia. my website is (Redacted) and i have my name on wikipedia in shuddh desi romance film page in casting. -117.222.221.17 (talk) 16:13, 20 February 2014 (UTC)

Note: Of the speedy deletions this article has, the most recent deletion is a G11. Articles meeting this criterion are generally not undeleted either because they require a complete rewrite or they violate our biographical or fair-use policies. All of the deletions have been under G11, which means an article is clearly promotional. In addition, you should not write about yourself. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 23:00, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
The latest version is not promotional in style at all. Its appearance may be for promotion by the writer. However not much claim of importance either. So bring this to WP:DRV or ask Jimfbleak to justify. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:30, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
  •  Not done as above DP 10:40, 23 February 2014 (UTC)

Toxicfox.co.uk

I feel this page was deleted unjustly, the page was not promotional in nature and in fact very similar to in style and content to another page (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Firebox.com) which is why I feel the page should exist. -37.191.108.138 (talk) 09:30, 20 February 2014 (UTC)

User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/A7

User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/G11

User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/G12

User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/G4

User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/U5

User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/G10

User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/G5 Please note the "X exists, so Y should" argument doesn't fly here. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 21:20, 21 February 2014 (UTC)

outpsyjah

i need to add more information to the article. you have stated that 'every question has been answered' which is some sort of vague overstatement and likely an attempt at censorship; an appropriate response would be appreciated... -Tomahawk333 (talk) 01:47, 20 February 2014 (UTC)

Which reliable sources will you be basing your additions on? It would help our consideration of the request if we knew the sources, since the article was deleted previously for lack of assertion of significance or importance. —C.Fred (talk) 01:51, 20 February 2014 (UTC)

ok, these sources; http://www.irrigator.com.au/story/199937/art-space-a-dream-for-artist/, http://western-riverina-arts.blogspot.com.au/2014/01/tom-vallance-rides-again.html; prove the existence of the artist behind 'outpsyjah', whilst soundcloud, facebook, youtube, and any number of websites that share information with others can be used to prove that outpsyjah's music exists. the importance is self-evident, it exists. no claim as to 'greatness' has been made, and your attempts at labeling this as flagrant advertising are in vain - the article must exist merely to cite the presence of outpsyjah online, and that presence's significance. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tomahawk333 (talk • contribs) 02:07, 20 February 2014 (UTC)

Again (for the fifth time) Not done and will not be done None of your sources support a credible assertion of notability for inclusion in a global encyclopedia. This has been repeatedly explained to you. Existence is not a criterion for inclusion. Please stop spamming this noticeboard. Acroterion (talk) 02:53, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
@Tomahawk333: the fact that this is your fifth request, that you are refusing to hear what you've been told by multiple editors and based on your post higher on this page where you state "if you refuse to undelete the article, i will persist", I am giving you notice now that your behavior is disruptive and further persistence will result in a block from further editing.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 03:45, 20 February 2014 (UTC)

i seek no 'inclusion', i just want my article reinstated so that i can add more information. you cannot call yourselves a 'global encyclopedia' if you fail to recognize an artist that dwells upon this 'globe'. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tomahawk333 (talk • contribs) 04:41, 20 February 2014 (UTC)

I don't recall any point where we've ever called ourselves a "global" encyclopedia. That's usually assumed. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 20:02, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
Acroterion did use the term four entries above; but the fact that someone "dwells upon the globe" is not a reason for inclusion. JohnCD (talk) 20:44, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Not done and will not be done DP 10:42, 23 February 2014 (UTC)

TekTone Sound & Signal Mfg. Inc.

There is no copyright violation and is verifiable via sources. Also did not receive notification that article was deleted. -Ttmktgmgr (talk) 15:22, 19 February 2014 (UTC)

Retrospelsmässan

Retrospelsmässan is the largest convention in Scandinavia for Retro Game fans. The first year the event took place was in 2010 and the organizers had hoped for 100 visitors, but at the end of the day 700 people had visited the event. In 2013 the event had 2800 visitors and gained a lot of recognizition in mainstream media such as Gp [2] (One of the Sweden's largest newspapers) and Gt [2] (Also one of the largest newspapers in Sweden). SVT [3] (Swedens official public TV network) recorded at the event which was broadcasted on public tv. Wired.co.uk also went there and an article was published on the net. [5]

Retrospelsmässan has the equal amount of visitors as noteable retro conventions as Portland Retro Gaming Expo. [5] Although not quite as many visitors last year, Retrospelsmässan has grown a lot faster then Portland Retro Gaming Expo. It took PRGE almost 10 years to gain 3000 visitors. Something Retrospelsmässan did in just 4 years.

One could argue Retrospelsmässan is the largest retro game convention in Europe but I haven't any sources to confirm that today. Retrospelsmässan also is sponsored by Bergsala which is the official distributor for Nintendo in the Nordic countries. Norwegian mainstream meda also wrote an article about Retrospelsmässan last year.(with a video). [6]

Retrospelsmässan is quickly rising to become Scandinavias largest retro game convention, maybe already Europe? And possibly in the future the worlds? Sweden were also behind the worlds largest computer festival (Dreamhack)

[1] http://www.gp.se/nyheter/goteborg/1.1664619-langa-koer-till-retrospelsmassan [2] http://www.expressen.se/gt/retrospelsmassan-drar-rekordbesokare/ [3] http://www.svt.se/nyheter/regionalt/vastnytt/gammalt-ar-hett-pa-retrospelsmassa [4] http://www.wired.co.uk/news/archive/2013-05/11/retrospelsmassan [5] http://retrogamingexpo.com/history_of_prge.php [6] http://www.aftenposten.no/kommentarer/Retrospill-er-i-vinden-7200920.html#.UwRS3nl5OCY

Cheers! // Mikael -Baconfiesta (talk) 07:11, 19 February 2014 (UTC)

User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/A7

User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/G11

User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/G12

User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/G4

User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/U5

User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/G10

User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/G5 G11s are usually an issue with the words and tone used in the article, as opposed to the sources. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 18:36, 19 February 2014 (UTC)

Scorpina

Redirect and possibly useful merge material lost after a tempetuous set of AFDs in 2013 that caused the redirect's target to be deleted. -—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 05:15, 19 February 2014 (UTC)

  •  Not done It was 1000bytes of original research. I could email the contents to you, but it's pretty lame. Let me know on my talkpage if you'd like the contents DP 10:47, 23 February 2014 (UTC)

Creating Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Brian Shaw

  •  Not done Although a G13, it has not been undeleted for 2 reasons: first, as a WP:BLP, there needed to be at least one source - even in draft mode. Second, there was so little content, it's easily recreatable, as long as it's sourced next time DP 10:50, 23 February 2014 (UTC)

ServiceMax

The article was speedily deleted as the creation of a banned editor [1] but a new article has been made to replace it. I'm requesting undeletion of the earlier version. I'd like to compare it to the current version. I have a suspicion that the new article may be the work of the same writer, but I'd like to compare the two to see whether that suspicion is justified. Could this be placed in my user-space, please? -—rybec 02:20, 23 February 2014 (UTC)

That's not likely to happen, but you could ask an admin to email you the article contents at time of deletion. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 06:47, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
 Not done The two articles are fairly different, but the common features are very similar infobox, and a history heading. The content and references are different. But perhaps both are the result of paid editing. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:20, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
I request its temporary undeletion so that non-administrators may make the same comparison in an Articles for Deletion discussion. 13:41, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
Two ways I see to go about this, restore as part of the history, then alter delete the lot and restore back the new version. Or move the current one, restore the old one and move again. Both will be disruptive to the content. But someone may be ahppy with that. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:36, 23 February 2014 (UTC)

sound world solutions

108.73.128.221 (talk) 14:37, 23 February 2014 (UTC)

 Not done because a new version has been created, no need to undelete the old one. JohnCD (talk) 21:07, 23 February 2014 (UTC)

Loadout

Recently an article called https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loadout was deleted,the admin that deleted it filed it under the reasoning A7 of criteria for speedy deletion: (A7: Article about a website, blog, web forum, webcomic, podcast, browser game, or similar web content, which does not indicate the importance or significance of the subject).

The content of the article the admin deleted though fell under none of what A7 states, the article was about a free-2-play shooter game available for free only on the game distributor,Steam. The game does not fit under the criteria because it's not a browser game or web content.

If I could have another admin look at the archived version for review purposes to verify for me, that would be great. Please look into this case. -Thdegy (talk) 15:35, 23 February 2014 (UTC)

  • Done You can use prod instead or add references if you actually want to keep this. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:26, 23 February 2014 (UTC)

Thank you for this, I'm glad to see the article restored again. Thdegy (talk) 22:23, 23 February 2014 (UTC)Thdegy

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Paramount Channel

I, Chkurz, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. User12 22:47, 23 February 2014 (UTC)

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.. Read WP:Your first article for advice, and note the need to references showing "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject" to establish Wikipedia:Notability.

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Windows 8, Good or Bad

I, 99.98.66.147, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 99.98.66.147 (talk) 03:05, 24 February 2014 (UTC)

"Work on it" for what purpose? This is an essay, an opinion piece, and "how to" article -- none of which are appropriate as a Wikipedia article. As such, it is not salvageable. Wikipedia is not a soapbox or forum for people to air their personal views. ~Amatulić (talk) 03:59, 24 February 2014 (UTC)

Myra Sky

Myra Sky is a prominent Pop star who people know about according to her 100k plus twitter followers and various articles written about her on line"Save page" button below -Clairebraemar (talk) 18:44, 23 February 2014 (UTC)

 Not done. Twitter followers and articles on her own web site don't convey any notability for Wikipedia purposes. WP:MUSICBIO outlines some criteria for inclusion. As this article was deleted according to WP:CSD#A7, it does not qualify for consideration for undeletion by request on this page. ~Amatulić (talk) 04:05, 24 February 2014 (UTC)

Frivolous (Musician)

Hi, There was no discussion about the legitimacy of my copyright ownership, so i am asking to please undelete both the Frivolous (musician) page as well as the album recording "Somewhere In The Suburbs" by Frivolous. I own this material, and if there is another website claiming ownership, they are doing so in violation of my ownership of this material. If I'm missing something please tell me how to proceed in compliance with your mandate. Thanks -Stubbyd (talk) 04:19, 24 February 2014 (UTC)

 Not done Some random username claiming they own some material carries no weight. Even if you have permission to distribute it, Wikipedia does not have permission, and will not have permission based on the say-so of some user account. If you want to reproduce copyrighted text, you need to prove that you are who you say you are, by writing to the Wikimedia Foundation from an identifiable address or domain name that verifies you are the copyright holder. See WP:CONSENT for more information. ~Amatulić (talk) 04:49, 24 February 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Klonarda Nezaj

I, 119.59.82.149, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 119.59.82.149 (talk) 04:28, 24 February 2014 (UTC)

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Amatulić (talk) 04:51, 24 February 2014 (UTC)

File:Channel 5 Old Logo.svg

This image is nominated for deletion in Commons. Also, it is UK-copyrightable, like Introspective. Therefore, the local copy should be undeleted. -George Ho (talk) 07:46, 24 February 2014 (UTC)

Trendspotters.tv

We need time to edit the page, add references and sources. The page was deleted in its initial stages. We have references for some facts that we stated and we would like to keep our page to that. -Gayatri0704 (talk) 07:59, 24 February 2014 (UTC)

Note: The page was speedily-deleted under criterion G11. Pages deleted under that criterion are generally not undeleted because they require complete rewrites to be viable encyclopedia articles or because they violate our biographical or fair-use policies. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 08:32, 24 February 2014 (UTC)

GHAZWA E HIND

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -14.140.53.242 (talk) 08:37, 24 February 2014 (UTC)

  • This page has not yet been deleted. Please visit the page to find out how to object to the deletion request. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:10, 24 February 2014 (UTC)

Jobs.co.uk - National Careers Website

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Pauljobs (talk) 08:50, 24 February 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Crocodile in Water, Tiger on Land

I, Urmibhanja, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Urmibhanja (talk) 19:06, 23 February 2014 (UTC)

There was a delay in edit, article got deleted as it appeared to be abandoned. -Urmibhanja (talk) 19:08, 23 February 2014 (UTC)

Delay in edit, article appeared to have been abandoned and thus got deleted. -Urmibhanja (talk) 19:09, 23 February 2014 (UTC)

  • Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:00, 24 February 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Lake Placid Sinfonietta

Sunshinenotes (talk) 15:04, 24 February 2014 (UTC)

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Read WP:Your first article for advice, and note the need for references showing "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject" to establish Wikipedia:Notability. JohnCD (talk) 16:37, 24 February 2014 (UTC)

Picsolve International

This page was deleted for the entry not being notable and for the award win being too specialised.. I was surprised to see this entry deleted. They are large recruiter of people all around the world (600+) and have sites at some of the biggest amusement and attractions around the world. I do not understand the criteria for award selection as all awards are specialised. Picsolve made the press with a big award win in an industry that is global. This was not a local obscure award win, in fact, the award giving body has its own Wikipedia page. -Mpbroadhurst (talk) 15:05, 24 February 2014 (UTC)

Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. I will notify user DGG (talk), who proposed it, and who may choose to nominate it at WP:Articles for deletion, which would start a debate lasting seven days, to which you would be welcome to contribute. See WP:Notability (organizations and companies) for relevant guidelines and WP:Notability (summary) for commentary. JohnCD (talk) 16:55, 24 February 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Elizabeth Stoffregen May

I, Slref, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Schlesinger Library (talk) 16:11, 24 February 2014 (UTC)

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 17:03, 24 February 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/CASH L3WIS

OriginalRichardParker (talk) 11:18, 24 February 2014 (UTC)

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Check out WP:MUSICBIO. JohnCD (talk) 17:09, 24 February 2014 (UTC)

George Ganchev

I'm not sure what was wrong with the page but I want to know before I make a new one. Note: Since I didn't write the article I don't even know if it was about the same George Ganchev. The one I'm interested in was the leader of the Bulgarian Business Bloc and later formed a new party named after his. If you can give me some info that would be appreciated! Thank you. -Kndimov (talk) 04:03, 24 February 2014 (UTC)

It was deleted in 2004 ago as a copyright violation of https://web.archive.org/web/20120727044657/http://www.omda.bg/page.php?tittle=Ganchev,_George&IDMenu=361&IDArticle=603
I'd say, feel free to create a fresh, well-sourced article in your own words. ~Amatulić (talk) 04:40, 24 February 2014 (UTC)
Ok thanks! The source above will be helpful was well. Kndimov (talk) 19:19, 24 February 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Gremlin-Taming

We'd like to edit the article and submit. -Gremlintamer (talk) 18:20, 24 February 2014 (UTC)

Two questions:
1. Who is "we"?
2. Also, the purpose of that article was purely promotional in violation of the WP:NOTPROMOTION policy. What purpose would it serve to restore the article? ~Amatulić (talk) 20:17, 24 February 2014 (UTC)

pioneating

I accept the deletion, but I would like a copy of the material for future use. -Jfsb (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 20:05, 24 February 2014 (UTC)

 Not done. You can get it while it's still in Google's cache; see http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:1Sg92qVAvQQJ:en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pioneating+ ~Amatulić (talk) 20:28, 24 February 2014 (UTC)

Coro (sport)

I understand this sport is not notable and not verifiable. However, I would like more people to know about it because I feel it is a very cool sport. I also understand that even though it is very unlikely that it will be restored, but I would like to be able to see the history of the page because I don't have an updated copy of the page anywhere else and I would like to be able to copy it and save it, so I will have it forever. -76.107.222.230 (talk) 23:01, 23 February 2014 (UTC)

Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Coro (sport), it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Mojo Hand (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review.
Also, we have no way to provide anonymous IP addresses with copies of deleted articles. ~Amatulić (talk) 04:01, 24 February 2014 (UTC)

I'm sorry for not providing my account. If you can find a way to get me this article I would be very appreciative.Hacker44 (talk) 18:40, 24 February 2014 (UTC)Hacker44

 Done - copy of the text emailed to you. JohnCD (talk) 21:11, 24 February 2014 (UTC)

Several camping templates

These were straight forward deletions. I would like to reestablish the templates so I can fill them out. Two of the three deleting admins aren't very active right now. Please advise if this can be done. --evrik (talk) 02:22, 23 February 2014 (UTC)

 Done. Unlike the other three, the CO one was actually the result of a TfD on the grounds that it was unpopulated, so please put something in it soon. JohnCD (talk) 21:36, 24 February 2014 (UTC)

Dark York

the page provides valuable information regarding Le1f's first mixtape and can be updated with various notes from valued muic sources including Pitchfork, Billboard, and Stereogum. I'm not sure why it was deleted in the first place tbh. -cmilette (talk) 21:16, 23 February 2014 (UTC)

Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. I will notify user Sulfurboy (talk), who proposed it, and who may choose to nominate it at WP:Articles for deletion, which would start a debate lasting seven days, to which you would be welcome to contribute. Check out WP:NALBUMS. JohnCD (talk) 22:54, 24 February 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Lincoln Hockey Club

I, 86.23.23.147, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 86.23.23.147 (talk) 21:43, 23 February 2014 (UTC)

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.. Read WP:Your first article for advice, and note the need to references showing "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject" to establish Wikipedia:Notability. JohnCD (talk) 23:00, 24 February 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Jetabroad

Dear editors, I would like to submit an unbiased and objective page for Jetabroad. I will use the drafts section and hopefully, avoid speedy deletion. Thank you for the consideration.

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Ckevinliu (talk) 02:13, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

Done - @Ckevinliu: as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 02:21, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

Joey Ciccone

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Knockonwood (talk) 01:13, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

I wish to edit it and make it acceptable.

Not done

Knockonwood (talk) 01:13, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

I have given the contributor some advice about what would be needed. DGG ( talk ) 05:47, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Venus Cow

STM (talk) 15:33, 23 February 2014 (UTC)

Note: The user expanded on this request at the AFC help desk. Mz7 (talk) 21:10, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
 Not done. This was actually deleted as an advertisement, so I do not want to restore it. In any case, you really need to start with a clean sheet. I will email you a copy of the text, if you like, and if you enable email on your account. To do that, click on "Preferences" at the top of the screen, and at the bottom of the "User profile" tab fill in your email address (which will not be visible to me or anyone) and check the box marked "Enable email from other users." I will also give some advice on your talk page soon. JohnCD (talk) 10:51, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

MobiDev

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Igor Pakhomov 11:13, 25 February 2014 (UTC) 1= MobiDev 2= There is the article about company in Ukraine which knows mobile development the Best then other. They created crossplatform development method which allows to solve a problem "a slow work the multiplatform mobile apps". In addition, why other company have his own page but MobiDev couldn't. If article has some unsuitable parts, author can rewrite it.

Comment - This article was deleted under WP:CSD#A7 - articles deleted under this criteria cannot normally be undeleted here; if the administrator has erred in the article's deletion, please contact the deleting administrator - otherwise, take this to WP:Deletion review. Please also see WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. hmssolentlambast patrol records 12:23, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/WXMN

I, Stereorock, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Stereorock (talk) 13:05, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

Done - @Stereorock: as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 13:17, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Dil Kitna Nadan Hai (1997)

Carpediem88 (talk) 13:44, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

  • Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:24, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Grady "Mack" McCarter

2602:306:CF3D:AA50:292F:2BEC:EC4B:F4F (talk) 22:41, 24 February 2014 (UTC)

  • Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:49, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

Muhammad Bayazid

He is a well known director. The article exists in Arabic Wikipedia 1 where it contains various resources and links. I will provide this article with some references. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wisamzaqoot (talk • contribs) 22:16, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

 Done. I have reset the clock so that you have seven days to add at least one reference to a reliable source. See WP:CREATIVE for what is needed in the longer term. JohnCD (talk) 22:36, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

Sonoma orogeny

My submitted an up-to-date well-referenced article in place of a now-discredited theory. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ahlitanah (talk • contribs) 23:55, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Clint Greenleaf

I, 38.111.224.13, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 38.111.224.13 (talk) 14:15, 26 February 2014 (UTC)

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 17:23, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_undeletion/Archive_120&oldid=1142568710"