The result of the debate was to follow the suggestion listed, since there was no objection. Wizardman 00:34, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Owing to some odd editing of the template, {{Osteo-med-stub}} was incorrectly moved to {{US-osteo-med-stub}}, and a new {{Osteo-med-stub}} was created in its place. This should be reversed, moving the old template back and removing the US-specific redirect this would create - there's certainly no need to start splitting this stub type by country.
At the same time, it's probably worth upmerging the template to Cat:Medicine stubs - the category has existed for nine months and only contains eleven stubs, waaay below threshold. Grutness...wha? 00:50, 25 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]