Wikipedia:Stub types for deletion/Log/2011/August/6
August 6[edit]
Cricket-admin-stub[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was rename -FASTILY (TALK) 07:39, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Rename {{Cricket-admin-stub}} to {{Cricket-org-stub}} - a stub type populated by cricket governing bodies and other organizations. It's not a subtype of {{Admin-stub}} as that doesn't exist but it is a subtype of {{sport-org-stub}} so propose renaming in line with other foo-org-stubs. SeveroTC 10:02, 6 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Thinking. Note that there is no Cat:Cricket organisations, but there is a Cat:Cricket administration. Currently the template upmerges to Cat:Cricket stubs. Would this be upmerged to Cat:Cricket administration despite the name discrepancy, or should a permcat be created for orgs in general? Pegship (talk) 17:16, 17 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- I would have thought a permcat for the orgs would be a good idea, but best to run it past WP:WikiProject Cricket, who are even more thoroughly organised than the stub-sorters! Grutness...wha? 01:40, 18 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- It's an odd one: Cat:Cricket administration is categorised within Cat:Sports governing bodies by sport. Sports governing bodies by sport naturally hosts organisations: most categories within it are called "organiz(s)ations" or "governing bodies": cricket is the only one called "administration" (the other odd-one-out is "Gliding associations" but I think association is similar enough to organization). So Cat:Cricket administration it is de facto for organizations. Perhaps best to take the permcat to CFD first... SeveroTC 04:53, 18 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- I would have thought a permcat for the orgs would be a good idea, but best to run it past WP:WikiProject Cricket, who are even more thoroughly organised than the stub-sorters! Grutness...wha? 01:40, 18 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.
Underpopulated Algerian geo-stub categories[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Upmerge both. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 05:33, 14 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Two seriously undersized Algerian geo-stub categories have appeared - unproposed and in need of upmerging. Unfortunately there's no possibility of these getting to threshold given the current number of articles marked with a plain {{Algeria-stub}}.
- Cat:Oran Province geography stubs (28 articles)
- Cat:Naâma Province geography stubs (14 stubs)
Grutness...wha? 09:41, 6 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.