Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2010 December 12

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

December 12

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:35, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Alsancak Station (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused Mhiji (talk) 18:08, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:35, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:A-League Supporters Groups (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Useless navbox Mhiji (talk) 18:02, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:54, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:2008-2010 ENC 1 standings (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. Blanked in April and not touched since. Mhiji (talk) 18:01, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was merge with 2006 Winter Olympics Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:34, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:2006 Winter Olympics calendar (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. Now unnecessary Mhiji (talk) 18:00, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. It's been standard practice to use these calendars on Olympics pages. Please reference 2008 Summer Olympics and 2010 Winter Olympics. I'd suggest re-integrating it back into the article instead of deleting it all together. Jared (t)03:17, 17 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:55, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:2006 Boise State Broncos football roster (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. Not a template. Mhiji (talk) 17:59, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was speedily deleted by Athaenara Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 20:43, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:2004–05 Elitserien season by team (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused navbox. All red links Mhiji (talk) 17:59, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:56, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:10 Most Populated Western Australian Cities (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. Redundant to Template:Cities of Western Australia Mhiji (talk) 17:44, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete/Speedy delete. Joke, or otherwise useless template. Rich Farmbrough, 21:37, 16 December 2010 (UTC).[reply]

Template:Toomanytags (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

We have {{Multiple issues}}. Instead of adding pointy tag just merge them. -- Magioladitis (talk) 17:14, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Unused. Pointless! Mhiji (talk) 17:26, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. JPG-GR (talk) 16:58, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Bibliotalk (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, unnecessary. Mhiji (talk) 13:13, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Delete, per nom. --vgmddg (look | talk | do) 00:24, 15 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. JPG-GR (talk) 16:59, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Australia FHW Squad 2007 Champions Trophy (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused navbox. Nearly all red. Mhiji (talk) 13:10, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. JPG-GR (talk) 16:59, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Algeria NFT results (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused navbox. Nearly all red. Mhiji (talk) 13:09, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Keep. Mhiji (talk) 10:20, 15 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Afghan parliamentary election, 2010 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, unnecessary. Mhiji (talk) 13:04, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Used again now. Standardised template (used for all election articles). —Nightstallion 09:38, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
OK, keep as now used. Mhiji (talk) 10:19, 15 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. JPG-GR (talk) 17:01, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:ActiveWiki (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, unnecessary. Mhiji (talk) 13:02, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

And also inaccurate. I'm not sure if ActiveWiki does public domain anymore. CompuHacker (talk) 19:25, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. JPG-GR (talk) 17:02, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:AFLGameDetailedwithET (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, unnecessary. Mhiji (talk) 13:00, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. JPG-GR (talk) 17:03, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:AFLMatchSummaryLine (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, unnecessary Mhiji (talk) 13:00, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. JPG-GR (talk) 17:04, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:1985 Oklahoma Sooners football roster (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, unnecessary. Not a template. Mhiji (talk) 12:26, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete as redundant to {{WPbox}} Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:38, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Antarctica WPbox (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, unnecessary. Mhiji (talk) 12:24, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Unless there is a duplicate somewhere. CompuHacker (talk) 19:26, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. JPG-GR (talk) 17:05, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Arabic Name (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, unnecessary. Not a template - just text Mhiji (talk) 12:23, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Merge Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:58, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Arctic topics (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. Redundant to Template:The Arctic Tundra Mhiji (talk) 12:22, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. JPG-GR (talk) 17:06, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Article question (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, unnecessary. Mhiji (talk) 12:19, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. JPG-GR (talk) 17:06, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:AustralianBaseballFederation (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. Redundant to Template:Baseball in Australia. Mhiji (talk) 12:18, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Keep. Mhiji (talk) 10:43, 15 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Australian Capital Territory elections (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. Redundant to Template:Government of the Australian Capital Territory Mhiji (talk) 12:16, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Speedy delete per G2 and G7. Mhiji (talk) 17:56, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autoload template (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, unnecessary. The blank syntax can just be copied from Template:Infobox book/doc. Mhiji (talk) 12:14, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've been off WP for a while. I'm intending to come back and make this a useful template. The JS found atUser:Inductiveload/Template autoloader.js would allow you to paste in the relevant code from the edit page without having to load up the Template docs and find the bit you want. It's already working for Infobox book, but that obviously not the only use for it. If every long template like an infobox had that, it would be much easier to get a blank template in place than it is now. Inductiveload (talk) 15:14, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, my bad, I forgot that that page was a test page. Delete it, the JS no longer requires it. Inductiveload (talk) 15:16, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. JPG-GR (talk) 17:07, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:BLPN template (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, unnecessary. Mhiji (talk) 12:11, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. JPG-GR (talk) 17:07, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:BTCC race report (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, unnecessary. Mhiji (talk) 12:07, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. JPG-GR (talk) 17:07, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Bolivian Football Regional Leagues seasons (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused navbox. Nearly all red. Not useful. Mhiji (talk) 12:03, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Keep. Mhiji (talk) 02:50, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Boston Militia roster (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, unnecessary Mhiji (talk) 12:02, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • Strong Keep' I posted it on the page now. FYI, the Militia are one of the more notable teams in women's football, having won their league's championship last year. BTW, I have no idea where you come across as dismissing templates without a thought or care-it's gonna take more than just two words to get this deleted. (You can add "uncivil" to your description) Tom Danson (talk) 15:32, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. JPG-GR (talk) 17:08, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Bus lyon (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, unnecessary Mhiji (talk) 12:00, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Userfy to User:Neelix/Asian topic so it can be improved prior to placing it back in template space or merging it with an existing template. --RL0919 (talk) 19:14, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Asian topic (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused navbox. Redundant to Template:Countries of Asia and other templates. Mhiji (talk) 01:57, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • Redirect to {{Asia topic}} -- the standardized name for these templates, and for which it is entirely redundant with (which is not the case with "Countries of Asia". 65.94.44.124 (talk) 06:41, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep and fix - This template needs to be fixed, not deleted. It is supposed to create demonym strings such as "Iraqi literature" and "Russian cuisine". I don't know how to fix the code to make this happen, but this would be a very useful template if it worked properly. Neelix (talk) 14:51, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    • But its a duplicate of Template:Asia topic. Speedy delete per T3. Mhiji (talk) 15:10, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
      • It is not intended to be a duplicate of Template:Asia topic. It only duplicates the functionality of that template currently because it isn't working properly. Broken templates do not need to be deleted; they need to be fixed. I do not understand the coding sufficiently to make it do what it is intended to do, but there must be someone who does. Template:Asia topic creates strings with country names, such as "Culture of Iraq" and "History of Russia". Template:Asian topic, however, is supposed to create strings with demonyms, such as "Iraqi literature" and "Russian literature". This is a valuable template, if only a user sufficiently knowledgeable about the code would fix it. Neelix (talk) 13:23, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
        • It doesn't matter what was intended, it's still a duplicate. Unused duplicates should be speedily deleted per T3. If in the future someone wishes to make a useful template they can still easily copy the code from {{Asia topic}} and adapt it. There's no point keeping this in it's current state. Mhiji (talk) 13:30, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. per Neelix. I did the same thing once before, several months ago. I began a deletion proceding on a similar-type demonym template. Can't remember the specific template, but the way it was explained to me (and there are several of these distinct model templates), they each have different functions, as Neelix very clearly explained. These are excellent templates, and some of them need tweaking, that's all.
 —  Paine Ellsworth CLIMAX )  07:11, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
After searching my archives and finding our old conversation in the section, Demonym-affixing templates, I feel it necessary to pull my "Keep". That discussion took place a little over a year ago, Neelix, so there has been ample time for you to find expert help to fix those templates. Since you feel they still are not ready to be transcluded to the various articles they would improve, then perhaps Mhiji is right. It might be better for you to userfy them until you can find a way to make them functional?
 —  Paine Ellsworth CLIMAX )  08:42, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
That would be fine. I just don't want the templates to be labelled recreations of deleted material once they are functional and are reinstated. I have left messages on the walls of relevant WikiProjects hoping that someone who knows enough about the code will be able to make them work; any suggestions at how else I might go about fixing them would be greatly appreciated. Neelix (talk) 15:02, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Once they are functional and reinstated, the transclusion process will begin, and the article improvements made. When that happens, it might be a good idea to use images, or some other "eye-catcher", that would give editors a solid headsup to the fact that DATs perform a different function. I sincerely wish I had the code savvy to help you, but when I looked at them a year ago, I was unable to accurately assess the problem that needs fixed, let alone make suggestions about repairs. I couldn't figure out what they were not doing. The Projects idea sounds fair, but those people are usually pretty overworked and backed up. You've already brought the DATs a long way, so what are the chances of your learning more about the code yourself so you can finish them without help?
 —  Paine Ellsworth CLIMAX )  17:08, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I may be able to figure out the code myself; I'll certainly give it another try. I may be able to order some books through my local library. Wikipedia: The Missing Manual has a section on editing with JavaScript. Do you know if that's the language I need to be better versed in so I can fix the DATs? Also, I want to be clear on what you mean by using images or other eye-catchers; are you suggesting that I make the DATs look different in some way from the country-name-affixing templates? Neelix (talk) 15:12, 15 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Not sure about the Java code, but the name of the code that I'm familiar with is the Wiki markup. You might also try the superb although overworked experts over at Bugzilla. Those guys truly know what they're doing when it comes to code. As for the "eye-catcher", I suppose it depends upon your final target. If you want to use the DATs as separate templates from the CNATs, then unless you devise a way to make them look different, you will have constant problems with DELETE and MERGE editors. If on the other hand your final target is more like editor Mhiji's merge idea below, which by the way does sound like a viable goal, then you'll probably get there shortly after you perfect the DATs and before you begin the transclusions. Either way, the global applications for both the CNATs and the DATs provide an excellent motivation to continue and finish the work. The DAT's, whether separate or internally combined with the CNATs, will be mindbending improvements to the articles that get them!
 —  Paine Ellsworth CLIMAX )  23:58, 15 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Good idea, and probably a lot easier than us non-experts could ever imagine! <g>
 —  Paine Ellsworth CLIMAX )  23:58, 15 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. JPG-GR (talk) 17:08, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Anyang KT & G Kites (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. Nearly all red links Mhiji (talk) 01:55, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. JPG-GR (talk) 17:09, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, unnecessary. Mhiji (talk) 01:54, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was speedy delete. G6 - consisted of non-free image. Jujutacular talk 05:59, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:AGRFU (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, unnecessary. It's just a link to a picture. Mhiji (talk) 01:52, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. JPG-GR (talk) 17:10, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:1976 TVB (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:1977 TVB (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:1978 TVB (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:1979 TVB (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:1980 TVB (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:1981 TVB (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:1982 TVB (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:1990 TVB (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:1991 TVB (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused navboxes. Very little navigation. Loads of red links. Mhiji (talk) 01:41, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. JPG-GR (talk) 17:11, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Battle for Vicksburg (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, unnecessary. Mhiji (talk) 01:37, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. JPG-GR (talk) 17:11, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Big Buttons (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, unnecessary. Mhiji (talk) 01:37, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete this page, Shrink individual templates. On their own, these could be useful on their respective WikiProjects or on individual userpages. As they stand now though they are way too big. Shrink them, and maybe they can be put together in a template box. --vgmddg (look | talk | do) 21:41, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. JPG-GR (talk) 17:11, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Battelle Hall Concerts (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, unnecessary. Not a template. Mhiji (talk) 01:36, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. JPG-GR (talk) 17:12, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Bangalore Bus Stations (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused navbox. Only actually links 2 bus station articles Mhiji (talk) 01:35, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:47, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Bang (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, unnecessary. Mhiji (talk) 01:34, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Keep. Mhiji (talk) 02:02, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:BSBroncosQuarterback (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused navbox. Nearly all red links. Mhiji (talk) 01:32, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. JPG-GR (talk) 17:19, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:BHRMY (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, unnecessary. Just a link. Mhiji (talk) 01:32, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. JPG-GR (talk) 17:19, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Aesthetics-taskf (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. Mhiji (talk) 01:27, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. JPG-GR (talk) 17:20, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:AVCWomenClub (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. Redundant to Template:AVCClub Mhiji (talk) 01:24, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Page is redundant and unnecessary. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.163.255.25 (talk) 05:42, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. JPG-GR (talk) 17:21, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:AS Dacia Orăştie squad (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. Nearly all red links. Mhiji (talk) 01:23, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. JPG-GR (talk) 17:21, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:1964 Olympics Image Gallery (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused Mhiji (talk) 01:20, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Support - We can convert the images into a gallery and delete the template. Chris (talk) 13:18, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. JPG-GR (talk) 17:22, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Andalusian Spanish (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused navbox. Nearly all red links. Mhiji (talk) 01:16, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. JPG-GR (talk) 17:23, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:CAA Men's Swimming and Diving Silver Anniversary Team (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:CAA Volleyball Silver Anniversary Team (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:CAA Women's Cross Country Silver Anniversary Team (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:CAA Women's Soccer Silver Anniversary Team (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:CAA Women's Swimming and Diving Silver Anniversary Team (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:CAA Wrestling Silver Anniversary Team (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused navboxes. Only links 2 players in all 6 navboxes. Mhiji (talk) 01:16, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:57, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Baseball Victoria (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused navbox. Nearly all red links. Mhiji (talk) 01:10, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:04, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Anyclip title (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, unnecessary Mhiji (talk) 01:06, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was redirect. If there is something missing, it can be recovered from the edit history and merged. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:45, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Airports of Turkey (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. Redundant to Template:Airports in Turkey Mhiji (talk) 01:03, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was no consensus. There appears to be some desire to delete the other one, since Northern Ireland and Ireland are not part of the same country, but that should be debated in another discussion. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:41, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Airports in Republic of Ireland (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused navbox. Redundant to Template:Airports in Ireland. Mhiji (talk) 01:02, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Speedy delete per T3 and G7. Mhiji (talk) 18:31, 15 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Age of the Five (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused navbox. All links are redirects. Mhiji (talk) 00:59, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I concur with Mhiji. It seems to have been taken over in function by Template:Trudi_Canavan, Sadads (talk) 01:05, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I also concur with Mhiji. Purpose has gone - it has changed content too much. :: Kevinalewis : (Talk Page)/(Desk) 17:41, 15 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:38, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:APBiology2009 FA (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:APBiology2010 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:APBiology2010 FA (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:APBiologyBapst2010 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:APBiologyBapst2010 FA (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

All unused, unnecessary. Mhiji (talk) 00:55, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete the other two - I'm reasonably sure that project never got off the ground.--JimmyButler (talk) 21:25, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
My apologies - apparently we managed to create two versions of these in setting up the project - the diff being the space between Biology and the year. All of these templates can be deleted.--JimmyButler (talk) 15:13, 18 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:36, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:AcademyAwardBestAdaptedScreenplay1927-1929 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:AcademyAwardBestAdaptedScreenplay1930-1939 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:AcademyAwardBestAdaptedScreenplay1940-1949 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:AcademyAwardBestAdaptedScreenplay1950-1959 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:AcademyAwardBestAdaptedScreenplay1960-1969 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:AcademyAwardBestAdaptedScreenplay1970-1979 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:AcademyAwardBestAdaptedScreenplay1980-1989 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:AcademyAwardBestAdaptedScreenplay1990-1999 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:AcademyAwardBestAdaptedScreenplay2000-2009 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

All unused. Redundant to Template:Academy Award Best Adapted Screenplay Mhiji (talk) 00:50, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:35, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Academy Awards ceremonies (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. Redundant to Template:Academy Awards. Mhiji (talk) 00:49, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete as redundant to Template:AKB48 Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:34, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:AKB48a (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused navbox. Nearly all red. Mhiji (talk) 00:47, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:31, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:2014 FIFA World Cup qualification - CONMEBOL (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. Far too early for this. When it's needed it can easily be copied from Template:2010 FIFA World Cup qualification - CONMEBOL. Mhiji (talk) 00:45, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete as unused and out of date (see Template:Basketball BundesligaPlastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:30, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:2. Basketball Bundesliga Pro A (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused navbox. Mhiji (talk) 00:42, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was speedy delete per WP:G2, as tagged by the nominator. Airplaneman 05:04, 18 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:CAS Idol (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused navbox. All red links. Mhiji (talk) 00:41, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:27, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Bus routes in Wales (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused navbox. The links are incorrect anyway as they are to English counties anyway? Think it may have been copied from Template:Bus routes in England. But don't think there's enough "List of bus route..." articles for Wales to justify a navbox. Mhiji (talk) 00:41, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.