Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2011 March 20

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

March 20

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Speedy delete per author request. --RL0919 (talk) 17:50, 28 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Reqa (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Not necessary; redundant to {{EP}} and {{ESp}} — Preceding signed comment added by Cymru.lass (talkcontribs) 22:22, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment from author: {{EP}} and {{ESp}} are used to put standard images and text in the response to the requester, below the request. This template is used to replace the {{edit protected}} and {{edit semi-protected}} templates (as noted on this template's documentation page). For example, this diff contains both the use of reqa and ESp: Talk:Jon Jones (fighter). If it's redundant to anything, that would be the {{tlf}} or {{tld}} templates, which the edit request template currently says to use like reqa. While those simply create text versions of the template call, reqa leaves instructions for the requester on how to reopen their request, as most declined requests are due to needing something further from the requester. — Bility (talk) 00:25, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Seems like a useful idea, and not redundant to {{EP}} and {{ESp}}. The functionality could possibly be added to those templates, although it is more natural for the response to appear below the request rather than as a header which this template will do. Cymru.lass: I'm disappointed that you nominate this template for deletion apparently without even discussing its purpose with the author or bothering to see what it does. If twinkle makes it too easy to create these drive-by nominations, perhaps you need to slow down a bit? — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 09:46, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    • Just to be clear, I don't intend for this to replace the response below the request; it's just an alternate, hopefully more useful way to un-transclude the request templates. — Bility (talk) 12:09, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Update: Made the change to {{edit semi-protected}} as suggested above, feel free to delete this template and its doc page. Thanks, — Bility (talk) 20:58, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:01, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Kesha singles (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Redundant template. Nav template for Kesha already exists and isnt very big. This Nav temp isnt needed. Should be deleted. - (CK)Lakeshade - talk2me - 21:57, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:59, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:United Nations Asia map (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused template, originally intended for the article on Asian Americans but the code could be easily incorporated without need for a template Green Giant (talk) 16:38, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:59, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Different conceptions of Asia maps (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused template that could be easily coded into an article Green Giant (talk) 16:35, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep, now that it has been modified. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:32, 30 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Ben Affleck (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Navboxes about Ben Affleck have been deleted at TFD twice before (December 2010 and October 2009). In both those cases, the template was only for movies he directed. This navbox also contains movies he wrote and produced, and some other links. Since this box is significantly different from the previous two, I don't believe speedy deletion applies. However, given the results of the two previous discussions, I thought it appropriate to bring here for the community's input about whether the expanded version should also be deleted. RL0919 (talk) 15:59, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I created this after discovering the previous deletions and assuming that they had only been for movies directed. I modeled this after {{James Cameron films}}. As the creator, I obviously feel we should Keep this template. I have not read his bio closely enough to know if additional lines should be added. I saw on his imdb page that he has performed on some soundtracks and am aware that most singers also have their songs in templates. I am fairly certain that he should not have "Jenny from the Block" in his template, but he may well have some other musical credits worth mentioning.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 16:15, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:58, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Composition of internal energy (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

No longer used. Concerns were raised on the talk page about original research and unsourcedness of the information. It seems that this is not needed any more. — This, that, and the other (talk) 03:08, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Olympic Medalists From Latrobe Valley & Gippsland

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:56, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Olympic Gold Medalists From Latrobe Valley & Gippsland (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Olympic Silver Medalists From Latrobe Valley & Gippsland (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Olympic Bronze Medalists From Latrobe Valley & Gippsland (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unnecessary - has only one link in it. Serves no purpose and has no sources. Laboulaye (talk) 11:49, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.