Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2011 November 7

< November 6	November 8 >

November 7[edit]

Template:List of MLB managers by season navbox[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 15:34, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:List of MLB managers by season navbox (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This template is soon to be orphaned, as the articles contained within will be merged per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Major League Baseball managers in 2010. – Muboshgu (talk) 19:55, 7 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete no future useCurb Chain (talk) 01:54, 8 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Non-free content[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 15:35, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Non-free content (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Restatement of WP:NFCC, rather than a real fair use rationale template. Not widely in use (only two usages). Seems too much potential for misuse on that one, where a real fair use rationale template would provide more complete information. SchuminWeb (Talk) 15:47, 7 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - I designed this template to be substed only, and supplemented by adding to each point, probably before a better template with parameters was available. User:Kaplansa perverted it for use on one image, and I have just corrected that perversion. Because it was designed to be substed, I have no easy way of determining how widely it was used (I admit, I should have added a cat or HTML comment to aid tracking, sorry). — Jeff G. ツ (talk) 21:52, 7 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Redundant to existing FUR templates, which aren't open to such abuse. --N Y Kevin @078, i.e. 00:52, 8 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Eeep. Yes, I agree that it's not helpful to make it easier for an editor to just subst a rationale which says that his upload passes all the NFCC than to take the effort to write a rationale. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 10:42, 9 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Redundant to existing FUR templates, which provide more information and are bot readable too. — Train2104 (talk • contribs • count) 00:03, 11 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Heritage protection in the United Kingdom[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. Unclear inclusion criteria; unused. Redrose64 (talk) 16:00, 15 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Heritage protection in the United Kingdom (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused and unecessary template. Proposed by me, but no consensus was reached as to appropriate content and/or usage. Jonathan Oldenbuck (talk) 15:41, 7 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete WP:OR Curb Chain (talk) 23:42, 7 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox Amtrak[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. Superseded. Redrose64 (talk) 15:52, 15 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox Amtrak (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Outdated template superseded by {{Infobox rail line}} and {{Infobox rail service}}. It's been calling the former since April 2008 and all transclusions have been removed. Mackensen (talk) 01:40, 7 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yet another good bit of cleanup on the way to finally unifying the hundreds of near-identical rail infoboxes. Good work. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) - talk 08:45, 7 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as redundant. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Andy's talk; Andy's edits 19:50, 7 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Canadian film list[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete, unused with no real links, can be undeleted if wanted. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 15:36, 19 November 2011 (UTC) Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 15:36, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Canadian film list (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused sidebar with not much to navigate. 98.228.49.153 (talk) 00:18, 7 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Projectify to the Canadian films task force. 70.24.248.23 (talk) 05:46, 11 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I have notified the relevant wikiprojects. 70.24.248.23 (talk) 05:50, 11 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.