Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2013 December 11

< December 10	December 12 >

December 11[edit]

Template:Turkish cuisine[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was merge, retaining the navbox format. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 20:50, 22 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Turkish cuisine (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Cuisine of Turkey (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Propose merging Template:Turkish cuisine with Template:Cuisine of Turkey.
the sidebar template is redundant to the navbox and should be merged. the navbox does a much better job at providing navigation, while not taking up space which could be used for images, and prose. for an example of the problem, see pilaf, where we have many sidebars/infoboxes, and redundant linking with both the sidebar and the navbox on the same page. I propose merging the two templates, with the final merged template being a navbox, like Template:Cuisine of Cyprus. I also think we should strongly consider doing the same with the other sidebars for consistency. Frietjes (talk) 16:06, 11 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Support. We have to convert Template:Greek cuisine, Template:Armenian cuisine, Template:Indian cuisine, Template:Iranian cuisine etc. to navboxes too. KazekageTR (talk) 19:19, 11 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Support merger into Template:Cuisine of Turkey. These types of massive cuisine templates are only good for a few of the major articles anyway. Their appearance in articles like Rize Tea is just overwhelming. The collapsibles are frustrating too. Plus, they sort of look like food magazine covers. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 20:57, 11 December 2013 (UTC1)

Support merger into Template:Cuisine of Turkey. The massive side bar detracts from the article header. The Navbar has a better sense of proportion: if you have read the article and want more info, ... For the same reasons, I agree that the other countries cuisines should be handled the same. jmcw (talk) 10:02, 12 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:MaReRe[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete after replacement, ensuring that no information is lost. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 19:40, 18 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:MaReRe (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

After 3 years this assignment must have been completed. Magioladitis (talk) 17:23, 23 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

delete, redundant to template:course assignment. Frietjes (talk) 17:25, 23 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete per G11; WP:DAFT 108.218.12.104 (talk) 18:42, 23 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
*Keep As with similar templates, it's kept as a record. I have, however, made it more up to date. Thanks for the reminder. --jbmurray (talk • contribs) 01:55, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, DrKiernan (talk) 09:54, 11 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

now replaced by template:course assignment on the six transcluding talk pages. Frietjes (talk) 18:05, 11 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Thank you for your industry and enthusiasm, but please don't do this while the discussion is ongoing. The template does *not* simply duplicate template:course assignment; as such, it is not redundant. --jbmurray (talk • contribs) 19:21, 11 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.