Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2014 August 11

August 11

Template:Welcomelaws

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. (NAC) Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 22:13, 18 August 2014 (UTC)

Template:Welcomelaws (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unlike other welcome templates for potential problem users, Template:Welcomelaws doesn't mention a specific problem with any of the new user's contributions. Its tone is also more negative than other welcome templates that mention the same policies, such as Template:Welcomeh. It should be deleted to avoid biting the newcomers. G. C. Hood (talk) 16:11, 11 August 2014 (UTC)

• Keep - It doesn't state a specific problem because it's used when there are more than one issue with the users edits, or for issues that can not be linked to a policy or guideline. Mlpearc (open channel) 18:24, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
• Keep: As someone who's got little experience in the way of welcome templates, I fail to see the negativity that nom saw. A general-purpose template that doesn't state a specific problem is good to have for cases where none of the other templates work. Supernerd11 _{Firemind ^_^ Pokedex} 02:50, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
• Keep - A good template to tell possible problem users about the rules here without being too negative. Very useful.--Auric talk 22:29, 17 August 2014 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:ImgH

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 05:21, 16 August 2014 (UTC)

Template:ImgH (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

strange fork of template:navbox which was being used in a very bad way in lmage, which is a hack of template:image. Frietjes (talk) 15:20, 11 August 2014 (UTC)

• Delete this is not a fork of navbox, it's a broken version of the Joan of Arc article, with transclusions directly coded into the page. -- 65.94.169.222 (talk) 06:56, 12 August 2014 (UTC)

• Delete: I don't see any documentation or subpages or anything, although there's plenty of activity in the history. Where would this be used? Supernerd11 _{Firemind ^_^ Pokedex} 02:53, 13 August 2014 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Gujarat Districts

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 03:56, 18 August 2014 (UTC)

Template:Gujarat Districts (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Redundant as unused template of list of districts of the Gujarat state. A footer template exists as Template:Gujarat which included the list of districts. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 06:50, 11 August 2014 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.