Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2015 August 16

< August 15	August 17 >

August 16[edit]

Template:Chester F.C. Player of the Year[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Opabinia regalis (talk) 05:08, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Chester F.C. Player of the Year (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Fails WP:NFOOTBALL and WP:GNG JMHamo (talk) 23:54, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. JMHamo (talk) 00:28, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep – Chester are now a professional club. Plenty of other clubs in a similar position that have the same page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2008jordancfc (talk • contribs) 02:08, 17 August 2015
Delete - Although the award may be notable, there's only one linked player in this navbox, so its usefulness is limited to that one page. Also, if the award is notable, why doesn't it have an article? – Pee Jay 07:03, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Does not provide useful navigation between articles. --Rob Sinden (talk) 07:56, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - too many redlinks. Club may be professional but the league it is in is not. Giant Snowman 17:47, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - not currently a useful aid to navigation. In time if sufficient players of note win the award it could be recreated. Fenix down (talk) 09:39, 20 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:The Simpsons episodes who have been tricked to bad[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G1 by Beeblebrox (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:17, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:The Simpsons episodes who have been tricked to bad (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Patent nonsense, indiscriminate set of episodes and a title in pidgin English. User's page is basically a gallery of female buttocks. '''tAD''' (talk) 01:03, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. —Maths314 (talk) 07:43, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nominator. Jc86035 (talk • contribs) Use {{re|Jc86035}} to reply to me 10:20, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Serves no valid navigation purpose, and may just be patent nonsense (creator can explain, if otherwise). Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 12:43, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.