Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2015 December 17

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

December 17

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge, feel free to move it to the correct title. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 12:42, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This template is a duplicate of the preferred and correct Template:2015–16 Pac-12 Conference women's basketball standings. ("Pac-12" is preferred to "Pacific-12") UW Dawgs (talk) 20:43, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2015 December 26Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 12:43, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was deletePlastikspork ―Œ(talk) 12:35, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

unused fork of {{convert}} which is redundant to {{convert|disp=unit}} and {{convert|disp=unit2}}. note this template is not used by (nor was it ever used by) {{convert/old}}. this template was used by other forks like {{convert/text2}} and {{convert/text3}}. but, now that those templates have been deleted, this one can be deleted as well. Frietjes (talk) 18:30, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete with link in deletion log summary. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 12:51, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is not actually a template, and there are no transclusions. Stefan2 (talk) 12:44, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

(namely, this discussion on Commons of the copyright status of works of the Texas government (and a couple other states)) Good idea, Frietjes, with "Legality unclear. State works probably not copyrightable absent specific legislation."
Noteworthy: there's no copyright notice at texas.gov. Rather it says "Some information on Texas.gov may be protected by trademark and copyright laws and otherwise protected as intellectual property." [1]--Elvey(tc) 21:49, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ http://texas.gov/#policies (Click 'more' under "Linking Policy"
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) Primefac (talk) 02:36, 25 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

WP:EXISTING -- It is used in only one article, Lance Leipold, making it hard to navigate. Also fails WP:NAVBOX No. 4: "There should be a Wikipedia article on the subject of the template". 🎄 Corkythehornetfan 🎄 08:18, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Functionally identical to numerous equivalent nav boxes as seen in Category:NCAA Division III football coach navigational boxes. UW Dawgs (talk) 15:38, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Then they need to be looked at, but one or two links is not sufficient enough to navigate, which is the whole point of the navbox. 🎄 Corkythehornetfan 🎄 18:41, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, thanks. 🎄 Corkythehornetfan 🎄 00:47, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge into {{British dogs}}. (non-admin closure) Primefac (talk) 07:12, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Template:Welsh dogs with Template:English dogs.
I propose changing the name of Template:English dogs to Template:British Isles dogs and merging Template:Welsh dogs, Template:Scottish dogs and Template:Irish dogs into it, in a similar manner to Template:Horse breeds of the British Isles. The histories of these countries and their dogs are intertwined, many of the breeds covered are shown in two or more of these templates and it will allow the separation of the Scottish, Welsh & Irish dogs into categories by role / type. Cavalryman V31 (talk) 10:33, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: I have undone the merger until this discussion reaches a consensus (either on the merger or final name).
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Primefac (talk) 19:19, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: {{Irish dogs}} has been kept separate, and this discussion is about the various UK dog breed templates.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Primefac (talk) 03:10, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Emmerdale family navigational templates

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relist to Dec 30. Primefac (talk) 07:14, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Per WP:NENAN. These are redundant to Template:Emmerdale characters. - JuneGloom07 Talk 20:35, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Primefac (talk) 01:42, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).