Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2015 January 23
January 23
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete per nom Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 09:54, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
- Template:Balasuriya (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
The heading of the template redirects itself back to an individual listed in the template. The only commonality between the individuals listed is their surname. Dan arndt (talk) 02:24, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
- Delete Per nom. Jackmcbarn (talk) 18:25, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
- Comment: I do need to note that this looks like it's an effort by one of a group of editors to add a specific person to Wikipedia, so this was likely done in order to try to add legitimacy to their claims. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 11:28, 24 January 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Delete. Obvious NPOV issues, unmanageable template (too many potential entries). Materialscientist (talk) 04:47, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
The template has the potential to be abused and to violate WP:NPOV. Neither of the individuals included in the template, to date, according to the information provided have been actually 'convicted' of corruption.. Dan arndt (talk) 01:55, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The Reformation (band)
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete as not useful for navigation Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 09:50, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
- Template:The Reformation (band) (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:The Reformation (album) (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Fatal Expectation (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Used in too few articles and not enough links to aid in navigation. Links to one another within the three articles should be more than sufficient. WP:NENAN. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 00:55, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Man/LinuxManPages
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete as defunct 09:47, 31 January 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Martijn Hoekstra (talk • contribs) Template:Man/LinuxManPages (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
The site LinuxManPages.Com no longer responds. I have replaced all the uses with links to die.net or some other suitable site with the same content (as far as I could reconstruct).-- era (Talk | History) 08:06, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.