Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2016 November 1

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< October 31 November 2 >

November 1[edit]

Template:U.S. statewide elected officials[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Relisted on 2016 November 8 ~ Rob13Talk 07:20, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Georgia statewide elected officials[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. No prejudice against creating a redirect, but the navboxes are actually quite different. The nominated template links to political offices whereas the other template links to politicians. The edit history wouldn't be relevant to the redirect. ~ Rob13Talk 07:19, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

unused, generally duplicates Template:Georgia Statewide Executive Officials, and confusing since the flag is for the country, not the state Frietjes (talk) 22:28, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Redirect per nom. Pppery 00:38, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:1980s French-Canadian television[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete ~ Rob13Talk 07:17, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template not used. Series and actors picked subjectively, without a particular criteria. Lack of WP:N. 2605:8D80:683:9DCD:B884:C4E7:71CC:8032 (talk) 22:05, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete for all the reasons given above. --Rob Sinden (talk) 10:45, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Geobox locator Woodford County, Illinois, USA[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:09, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

unused and duplicates Module:Location map/data/USA Illinois Woodford County, etc. Frietjes (talk) 21:52, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Where are the "etc." replacements? I see a Module:Location map/data/USA Illinois Peoria County but I don't see Module:Location map/data/USA Illinois Fulton County, Module:Location map/data/USA Illinois Tazewell County, or Module:Location map/data/USA Illinois Vermilion County. Until they exist, the Geobox templates (which presumably contain the existing coordinates for that map image) shouldn't be deleted. --Closeapple (talk) 20:56, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Closeapple, try Template:Location map USA Illinois Fulton County, Template:Location map USA Illinois Tazewell County, or Template:Location map USA Illinois Vermilion County. The older location maps are in Template-space, rather than Module-space. Thanks! Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:08, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Geobox locator Texas svg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:08, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

unused and duplicates Template:Location map Frietjes (talk) 21:50, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Geobox locator NYC Space[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:08, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

unused and under construction for over 8 years Frietjes (talk) 21:50, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Foxes singles[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:22, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

unused and pointless, just transclude Template:Foxes Frietjes (talk) 21:48, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Forced Labor[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:22, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

unused and generally duplicates Template:Slavery Frietjes (talk) 21:47, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:For the Love of Ray J[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:17, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

unused and duplicates other navigation Frietjes (talk) 21:45, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Footer Albums Sol Invictus[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:17, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

unused, and duplicates Template:Sol Invictus Frietjes (talk) 21:44, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Footballbox7[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:17, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

unused and undocumented Frietjes (talk) 21:43, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:FireServiceWikiProject-Chief[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:12, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

unused, if needed could be moved to a subpage of Wikipedia:WikiProject Fire Service Frietjes (talk) 21:40, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:FindDPLA[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:12, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

unused, under construction for years Frietjes (talk) 21:39, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:FilmdbLink/link[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G7 by Mojo Hand (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 14:28, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

unused Frietjes (talk) 21:38, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Fearsome critters[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Moved to Template:American folklore/sandbox Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:21, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

unused. per WP:BIDIRECTIONAL it's hard to see how this would be used. Frietjes (talk) 21:37, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Paging Montanabw: we had some kind of plan for this... Brianhe (talk) 21:45, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
We did have some kind of plan for this... it got dropped... I think we were trying to figure out the intersection of this one and Template:American folklore which has a "fearsome critters" subgroup. For now, I would like to propose Merge so we keep the edit history and not lose our research. Montanabw(talk) 22:44, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Members of the Francophonie[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:16, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

unused Frietjes (talk) 19:42, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Melanesia/Categories[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:51, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

unused, functionality now provided by Template:WikiProject Melanesia Frietjes (talk) 19:41, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Medicine navs/categorize[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G7 by Mojo Hand (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 14:28, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

"abandoned subtemplate" Frietjes (talk) 19:36, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. I am the creator & the abandonator. Left behind in a big makeover. -DePiep (talk) 19:49, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Sound of Contact[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Relisted on 2016 November 7 Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:19, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Adebisi Shank[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:14, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not enough non-tangential links to provide useful navigation. Rob Sinden (talk) 10:20, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • delete, only used in one article. Frietjes (talk) 19:10, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:User wikipedia/NPW[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G6 by Kudpung (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 11:08, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The NPWatcher script has not been in use for several years. The nomenclature New Page Patroller has been replaced by a new user right, New Page Reviewer, for which replacement user boxes have been created and deployed. Please delete as soon as possible as this is holding up the creation of new categories. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 06:13, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:User wikipedia/NP Patrol2[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was wrong forum (userboxes are discussed at MfD) ~ Rob13Talk 17:47, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The nomenclature New Page Patroller has been replaced by a new user right, New Page Reviewer, for which replacement user boxes have been created and deployed. Please delete as soon as possible as this is holding up the creation of new categories. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 06:11, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:User NP Patrol and RC Patrol[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was wrong forum (userboxes are discussed at MfD) ~ Rob13Talk 17:47, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The nomenclature New Page Patroller has been replaced by a new user right, New Page Reviewer, for which replacement user boxes have been created and deployed.

Please delete as soon as possible as this is holding up the creation of new categories. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 06:10, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:User Newpages with Twinkle[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G6 by Kudpung (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 11:08, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The nomenclature New Page Patroller has been replaced by a new user right, New Page reviewer, for which replacement userboxes have been created and deployed to be used only by holders of the New Page Reviewer (patroller) right.

Please delete as soon as possible as this is holding up the creation of new categories. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 06:07, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Future person[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:13, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

"Future" templates were deprecated and deleted in 2009 after an RfC. KATMAKROFAN (talk) 03:09, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Diplomatic missions in Singapore[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:13, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

few working links. Frietjes (talk) 17:57, 24 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Huggi: Frietjes (talk) 17:57, 24 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:38, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Mexican automotive presence timeline, 1920s-present[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:13, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

unused. Frietjes (talk) 22:15, 24 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:37, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Mexico family tree[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:33, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

not transcluded. should be either (a) moved to an article, or (b) deleted. as it stands now, it duplicates the ancestry sections in the individual articles. Frietjes (talk) 22:38, 24 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:37, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Olympic Champions of Armenian Descent[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:02, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

unused and no parent article Frietjes (talk) 22:57, 24 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Strong keep: If the athletes listed were mostly redlinked, I'd say delete it, but they are all good links. So, I think that this navbox should be added to every page it refers to, plus Armenia. There was a parent article but it was deleted. So, the title should be either not wikilinked or changed like so: Olympic Champions from Armenia. I'll try to make it back here to do this process if no one else gets around to it. Thanks! — Geekdiva (talk) 00:20, 25 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Geekdiva, can you provide the name of another template of this type? Special:PrefixIndex/Template:Olympic_Champions_of shows only this one. Frietjes (talk) 13:33, 25 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:15, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Strategic Educational Alliance of Southeast Asia[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:03, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

no parent article. Frietjes (talk) 15:37, 24 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:05, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Happy New Year 2013[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:50, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It stopped being 2013 three years ago, and, considering the image contains the text "2013", which means that it cannot be used for other years. (And I get the first TfD nomination of the month!!) Pppery 00:12, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete – I created this, but with the image, it's only usable for 2013. It was used via substitution, so deletion won't remove it from user talk pages. North America1000 08:22, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2016_November_1&oldid=1083550636"