Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2017 April 14

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

April 14

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Merge with the article and delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 16:17, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused template, pure decoration The Banner talk 21:03, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was no consensus, {{Olympic Games controversies}} template was modified after this discussion was started, and no new comments were made thereafter. Please feel free to renominate the template if you would still like to see it deleted. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 17:04, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Entirely redundant to Template:Olympic_Games_controversies and mostly made up of redlinks. ―Justin (koavf)TCM 07:13, 29 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Primefac (talk) 00:19, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: The {{Olympic Games controversies}} template has been modified to include the existing information. Pinging @Frietjes, Molandfreak, and Koavf: for thoughts on the update, as this was the primary concern for keeping the "Concerns" template.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Primefac (talk) 15:30, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Move to List of terrorist incidents in Canada Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 16:20, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NAVBOX, similar template {{BritishTerrorism}} recently closed as delete. Olidog (talk) 13:10, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Relisted on 2017 April 22 Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 17:06, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Relisted on 2017 April 22 Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 17:06, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Relisted on 2017 April 22 Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 17:06, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 16:26, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

single-use templates which I have merged with the articles, so the template-space versions are no longer needed Frietjes (talk) 00:26, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).