Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2017 May 13

< May 12	May 14 >

May 13[edit]

Template:GPnotebook[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was no consensus to delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 18:51, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:GPnotebook (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

No longer free access. It appears one needs to register / pay. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 05:07, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete that's a real pity, this was a straightforward and cleanly written link for many anatomy articles. A pity to see it behind a paywall, but we are not here to offer advertisements to other websites, especially profit driven --Tom (LT) (talk) 10:58, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep but stop using in the ==External links== section. The rationale sounds like a good reason to stop using it in ==External links==, but I don't see any reason here to explain why we should delete it. Deleting it will break all previous uses on talk pages, as refs, in old revisions, etc. WhatamIdoing (talk) 15:57, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- A number of us have removed it from most EL sections. We are now down to less than 100 uses. Better to switch to a "cite web" template IMO. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 23:03, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  - I think that we've gotten all of the WP:ELNO #6 violations cleared out now, but that still leaves us with about 40 refs and about 10 talk-page transclusions. The usual difficulty with switching to {{cite web}} is that if they ever re-arrange their website, we'd have to update all of those individually, instead of centrally. I'm not convinced that it's worth deleting the template. WhatamIdoing (talk) 02:02, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    - While right now most of us cannot get easily get access. Probably best to replace that ref generally. I guess deletion can be done after that occurs. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 15:22, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Primefac (talk) 00:17, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 22:29, 13 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

rename as say {{cite GPnotebook}} and rewrite it as a frontend for {{cite web}}, since it's being used for references and not as an EL template. Frietjes (talk) 18:09, 14 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:The Accident Experiment[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 18:47, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:The Accident Experiment (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Non-notable band does not seem to warrant its own template. UnitedStatesian (talk) 21:15, 13 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

delete, no parent article. Frietjes (talk) 18:10, 14 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Beelzebubba track listing[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 18:46, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Beelzebubba track listing (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

single-use template Frietjes (talk) 12:23, 13 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, not useful for navigation. Jc86035 (talk) Use {{re|Jc86035}}
to reply to me 14:58, 13 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Turn the Radio Off tracks[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 18:45, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Turn the Radio Off tracks (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Fantasea tracks (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

not needed for connecting two songs, redundant to the navbox Frietjes (talk) 12:22, 13 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, not useful for navigation. Jc86035 (talk) Use {{re|Jc86035}}
to reply to me 14:58, 13 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Knight's Cross recipients of EPG/SKG 210[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 18:59, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Knight's Cross recipients of EPG/SKG 210 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Insufficient navigation -- only two entries. The rest have been redirected to alphabetical lists for lack of notability. K.e.coffman (talk) 04:51, 13 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, not useful for navigation. Jc86035 (talk) Use {{re|Jc86035}}
to reply to me 14:58, 13 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Dated[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 June 7. Primefac (talk) 15:18, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Dated (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).