Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2019 August 15

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

August 15

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 02:01, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unused template. Now redundant to {{WikiProject Oregon collapsing section top}} after I added an open option. --Trialpears (talk) 21:02, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No strong opinion (as creator, 12+ years ago), I haven't looked into the details but I take you at your word that you've addressed any practical needs that might be impacted. Thanks for the housecleaning. -Pete Forsyth (talk) 00:43, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, redundant to a better template. There is still 1 transclusion which should be replaced. BLAIXX
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. czar 10:39, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Alternative box header template redundant to {{Box-header}}. Only one transclusion in the Portal:India specific version of this template, Portal:Current events/India/box-header-blank. There are other weird box headers that probably should be deleted/merged/modified as well, but none of them as bad as this one. --Trialpears (talk) 20:44, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 02:01, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Very niche template used only twice 8 years ago. I believe this problem doesn't exsist now anyway since {{main other}} should prevent cleanup categories from being applied on js pages. --Trialpears (talk) 20:35, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This would probably be substed by most editors. And while the meta-templates I built for cleanup are namespace sensitive, this is for the case where a piece of javascript contains explicit code including a category such as

value= text.replace(/[[Category:Foo]]/,'')

All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 20:55, 15 August 2019 (UTC).[reply]
It was indeed substituted by you in both cases I found using this search. --Trialpears (talk) 21:18, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2019 August 24. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 19:36, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Denver RTD s-line templates

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete -FASTILY 00:38, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

s-line data modules

{{s-line}} templates for Denver's Regional Transportation District. Superseded by Module:Adjacent stations/RTD. All transclusions replaced. There are 24 dependent s-line data modules which should also be deleted. Mackensen (talk) 13:18, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. czar 10:35, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NOTVGUIDE The Banner talk 08:53, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. czar 10:32, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Contains links to only 3 articles, all of which navigate to and from each other without the need of this navbox. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 05:03, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2019 August 23. Primefac (talk) 16:41, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 02:01, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unused fork of {{METRORail Red Line}}. They may have varied when the northern extension of the Red Line was under construction but there's complete overlap now. Mackensen (talk) 01:13, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom, duplicate of another template. BLAIXX
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).