Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2020 January 31

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< January 30 February 1 >

January 31[edit]

Template:Aframusic[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Pkbwcgs (talk) 08:43, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ItsAlwaysLupus (talk · contribs) created this navbox template on 30/1/2020 for "Black American music" to combine various ostensively African-American music genres. It attempts to categorize different genres by era and is largely original research (EDM supplanted R&B since the 1970s?). Separate navboxes for {{Blues}}, {{Rhythm and blues}}, {{Soul music}}, etc., have existed for some time. Also, are music navboxes by race/ethnicity/heritage appropriate? —Ojorojo (talk) 16:25, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. I can see the logic behind this. What I can't see is any need for it, given the existing templates. And, the term "Aframusic" seems to be an invented term for which no sources exist. We should stick to the existing templates that cover music of African-American origin quite adequately. Ghmyrtle (talk) 17:38, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Humorous categories[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. WP:SNOW deletion; see also Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:The Supreme Superior Malevolent Evil Ghost Cabal of Death, Destruction, Darkness, Doom and All Other Negative Adjectives You Can Think Of JBW (talk) 14:35, 4 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Categories are not for games, they actually serve a purpose, unlike this template. Gonnym (talk) 14:54, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete pointless category created by a now-indef'd troll sock. ——SN54129 15:27, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Completely pointless template, we should not be creating joke categories anyway. Hog Farm (talk) 17:31, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Busy2[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete after converting uses to {{busy}}. — JJMC89 (T·C) 01:13, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Similar to two recent TfDs Busy/Exams and BusyEmail. This has almost the same exact text and only 15 uses (about a 1/3 of that as most are the same transclusion). Current uses should be subset to the standard one. Gonnym (talk) 14:46, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Snow clause[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. WP:SNOW deletion JBW (talk) 14:39, 4 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and should not be used. There already is {{Old XfD multi}} which just recently combined similar templates to create a consistent style. "snowball clause" is also not a policy or a guideline, but a supplemental/essay and should not be presented as if it has any equivalent footing as one. Gonnym (talk) 14:37, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Uw-ghost4[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. WP:SNOW deletion. Also likely created by a block-evading editor (G5). JBW (talk) 14:20, 4 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, unusable template. ——SN54129 11:25, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Scott Frank[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2020 February 8. (non-admin closure) Pkbwcgs (talk) 08:42, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Latin Grammy Award for Best Male Pop Vocal Album[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2020 February 8. (non-admin closure) Pkbwcgs (talk) 08:42, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Iranian rock[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2020 February 16. Primefac (talk) 15:29, 16 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Miss Georgia winners in the Big Four pageants[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. (non-admin closure) Pkbwcgs (talk) 08:41, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This template is supposed to be used to identify all the women from the country of Georgia who have won one of the alleged Big Four international beauty pageants: Miss World, Miss Universe, Miss International, and Miss Earth. (Some other countries have similar templates, as seen at Template:Big Four pageant winners by country footer.) However, none of these pageants has actually been won by a woman from the Republic of Georgia, so there is nobody linked on this template. Metropolitan90 (talk) 06:17, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2020_January_31&oldid=941093578"