Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2021 February 13

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< February 12 February 14 >

February 13[edit]

Template:Thanda Royal Zulu F.C. squad[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 01:05, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

template is about five years out of date, and club no longer exists anyway Microwave Anarchist (talk) 22:00, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. More like 10 years out of date. Nigej (talk) 06:40, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 12:33, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - club no longer exists so no need for squad navbox. GiantSnowman 12:33, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Islam-today[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) --Trialpears (talk) 08:53, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate/same purpose as {{Today/AD/AH}}. HyperGaruda (talk) 15:22, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • I don't particularly like the 'same purpose' template's styling, but delete Islam-today regardless. --Izno (talk) 01:03, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Module[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was redirect to Template:Ml. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 16:03, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This template is not sufficiently complex to be needed as a template and has only had an uptake of some 50 uses in the past 7 years. (See also the see also links as reasonable uses.) Suggest subst and delete. Izno (talk) 03:37, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete unnecessary - maybe replace with a redirect to {{Ml}}. Elliot321 (talk | contribs) 03:40, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Subst and redirect to Template:Ml for consistency with Template:Template, which redirects to Template:Template link Agree this template, as currently coded, is not complicated enough to warrant a template. * Pppery * it has begun... 04:53, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect to {{Ml}}. Was created (by me) to provide consistent formatting; also congruency with {{tl}}. As for 'not complicated': could be extended to enforce presence of ns exactly once (unlike current {{tl}}, which fails when entering ns "template:Foo"). -DePiep (talk) 12:44, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:WikiProject watchlist[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 01:02, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Link has been broken since 2014. * Pppery * it has begun... 01:53, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2021_February_13&oldid=1008242662"