Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2021 November 2

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< November 1 November 3 >

November 2[edit]

Template:Str find0[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 21:57, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There are three template wrappers for {{#invoke:string|find}}, which searches for a string inside another string and returns the position as a one-based index: {{strfind short}} (a completely straightforward wrapper), {{in string}} (which adds a |nomatch= option), and {{str find0}}, which subtracts one from the result before returning it. This is more wrappers than are necessary; it is simpler to just have one or two. (There is also a different template called {{str find}}.) I think this makes it sufficiently redundant for deletion.

This template is suposed to simplify calculations for expressions like {{str right|ABCDE|{{str find0|ABCDE|C}}}} = CDE, which displays the string ABCDE starting at C, and would otherwise need to be {{str sub|ABCDE|{{#expr:{{strfind short|ABCDE|C}}-1}}}}. However, that isn't particularly common and it is arguably clearer and more versatile to just use a template like {{replace}} or {{#invoke:string|match}} to remove or select bits of string X based on the position of substring Y. There is also a one-based substring template, so {{str sub new|ABCDE|{{strfind short|ABCDE|C}}}} does the same thing as the first example without needing an {{#expr}}. There are currently only 15 transclusions of this template, mostly in userspace. I would suggest that these be substed down to the form with {{#expr:{{strfind short|...}}-1}} if the template is deleted. User:GKFXtalk 21:26, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Oldafdfull/new[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G6 by Materialscientist (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:06, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. The last one is nothing but blank space. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:09, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete: Judging by the page history, it seems that Jarry1250, bless his heart, tried to make this template but couldn't figure out how to do it and gave up lol. 2nd one is also just blank. Curbon7 (talk) 05:21, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Oldwelcome[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 21:58, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome 2 is unused and both are not needed as welcome messages are longer required using a separate template. But these two are not the typical welcome messages new users receive. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:09, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

These two were featured on the Unused Templates report so yes being unused is relevant. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 01:35, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Oldinterrupted[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 21:58, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:09, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • This is another template that should be substed, so its lack of use is irrelevant, however delete anyway as this appears to be a personal template fork by a user who hasn't edited since 2019 disagreeing with a 2009 template change. * Pppery * it has begun... 00:47, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Odd polygon db[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was speedy delete. Speedy deleted at request of page creator. Liz Read! Talk! 02:42, 5 November 2021 (UTC) Liz Read! Talk! 02:42, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

All unused. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:09, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete (as creator): these are superseded by currently-used {{Regular polygon db}} and {{Regular polygon stat table}}. Double sharp (talk) 21:21, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. * Pppery * it has begun... 00:47, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Officeholder table/color[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 21:59, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and just duplicates the main Officeholder table template. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:09, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Offer help side box[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was speedy delete G7. Yeah, sure. (I'd forgotten this existed!) Enterprisey (talk!) 22:04, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:09, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:OGL-2.0[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2021 November 9. Izno (talk) 21:59, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Original Wikimedia contributions PD with CC0 fallback[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 21:59, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:09, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:OSM Location map from table[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 22:00, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

All unused. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:09, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

First two can be deleted. They were a blind alley which went nowhere. Third looks like a thing no-one needs, so delete all three RobinLeicester (talk) 22:36, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. * Pppery * it has begun... 00:47, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The third one was intended for OSM-based maps - as long as all are uploaded to Commons this will stay unused Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 08:13, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Objects near railway station Novaya Derevnya[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 22:00, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and the Novaya Derevnya article already has a route map. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:09, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:OldCricketCOTF[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 22:05, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and the subproject of WikiProject Cricket has been inactive since 2005. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:09, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:OW load[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 22:06, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:09, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:OTD-userpage[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 22:06, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and I doubt user's will be featured on the main page. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:09, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete as unused, although it's worth pointing out that the second part of the nomination is nonsense; this template has nothing to do with user's [sic] being featured on the main page, but would instead be used to recognize a user's contributions to an article that appeared in the On this Day section. * Pppery * it has begun... 00:47, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
* Pppery *, saying, "although it's worth pointing out that the second part of the nomination is nonsense", counts somewhat as a personal attack. You could use the later part of your delete vote to explain why what I said isn't correct. But what I said is I doubt that a user will be featured for their efforts on the main page. Nothing I said was nonsensical or what you perceived to be. Refrain from such language in the future. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 01:34, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:OlympicNationWinterRow[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 22:07, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and unlikely to be after this featured list discussion from January 17, 2009. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:09, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:OTRS pending subcat starter[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2021 November 9. Izno (talk) 22:07, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:LKL seasons[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 22:08, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

redundant to season list in Template:LKL Frietjes (talk) 20:50, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Battle green[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 17:25, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and has been sitting around for nearly six years exactly. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 20:09, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Izno (talk) 20:40, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as unused. User:GKFXtalk 21:28, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. * Pppery * it has begun... 00:47, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Blue Flag Beaches Wales[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 17:25, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused fork map of the one used on List of Blue Flag Beaches of Wales. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 20:29, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Izno (talk) 20:40, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Ohio NHLs map[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 22:10, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused maps. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 20:19, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:OhioRevisedCode[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 22:10, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and redundant to Template:ORC. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 20:19, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Official Statement of OP on the symbol[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 22:10, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not a template and just a link to a Facebook post of some organization. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 20:19, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete not suitable content for a template. User:GKFXtalk 21:28, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. * Pppery * it has begun... 00:47, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Ontario Radio Markets[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 22:11, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and just links to other templates that are being used. Unnecessary and not really a template. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 20:13, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Omnitruncated hypercube polytopes[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Moved to userspace by the creator (non-admin closure) * Pppery * it has begun... 00:47, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and redundant to Template:Cantitruncated hypercube polytopes. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 20:09, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Opinion polling for the next United Kingdom general election[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2021 November 9. Izno (talk) 22:11, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Outline city[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2021 November 9. Izno (talk) 22:11, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:King's Singers Members[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 22:11, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

unused, appears to duplicate The King's Singers#Lineup and The King's Singers#Timeline Frietjes (talk) 18:57, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Order For Courage 1st class[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 22:13, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

All unused. And all these templates do is just add the file of the badge onto it when the file's are being used across multiple articles. Unnecessary transclusion of images. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 18:15, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:X Factor (Belgium)[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 22:13, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

single-use infobox Frietjes (talk) 18:14, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Olivia Olson[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 22:13, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and no links to any albums or soundtracks by the singer. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:30, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete only one link is actually one of her albums. The rest are multi artist albums and therefore don't need her template. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 04:23, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:OrbitData[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 22:14, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not used. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:27, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Orphaned notice[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Redirect, non-admin closure. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 04:24, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No longer used as tagging orphan files has been substituted. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:25, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Ordovician epoch nav[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was redirect to Template:Ordovician nav. Izno (talk) 22:14, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and redundant to Template:Ordovician nav. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:06, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Ohio Valley Conference softball navbox[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 22:15, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and no links to any softball teams or programs in the Ohio Valley Conference. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 15:58, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Overland Park, Kansas[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2021 November 9. Izno (talk) 22:15, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:OFAN[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2021 November 9. Izno (talk) 22:15, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:OC Streetcar infobox[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 22:15, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The OC Streetcar article already has the route map as part of the infobox. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 15:04, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Kcal[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 03:27, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. Redundant to {{Convert}}, which is much more flexible and better mantained. – Jonesey95 (talk) 01:30, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:32TeamX4RoundBracket7[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 03:27, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:49, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Qso[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 03:27, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Both unused and were probably test templates. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:30, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete as unused. I don't think these are a test, given that the creator has been around since 2004 and is a former admin so knows better than to create test pages. * Pppery * it has begun... 00:51, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:QldElectoralRedistribution[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 03:27, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:28, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete It was set up to do a specific job (an electoral redistribution), that's been done. It can go now. Kerry (talk) 00:44, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. * Pppery * it has begun... 00:51, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Quran entities[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 03:27, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:26, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Qingming[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 03:26, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and not the actual date of the festival. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:24, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Iran football labelled map[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 03:26, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A pointless map that links to Iranian soccer/football teams. Not used anywhere and labelled maps are for regions of country to help navigate between the links provided. Maps are not for sports clubs. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:22, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Qom[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 03:26, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused map. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:22, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Queensland Rail City network[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 03:26, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ununsed fork of Template:Beenleigh railway line. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:16, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Queensland Premier Rugby Teams[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 03:26, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An unused table that's redundant as a navbox already exists for the teams in this league. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:11, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2021_November_2&oldid=1054414101"