Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2021 September 22

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

September 22[edit]

Template:User SPI Clerk[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 03:30, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please see WT:SPI/C#Is Template:SPI empty report in use?; no one on the clerk team can quite figure out what this was for, or why it has a nontrivial history despite having no transclusions and not being the kind of template you'd subst, but everyone seems to agree it's no longer in use, if it ever was. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she/they) 17:05, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Miss Congeniality[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 03:28, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template links to only two articles; does not meet guidelines at MOS:FILM#Navigation. DoubleCross () 14:12, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. --Engineerchange (talk) 14:47, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Swedish nuclear weapons program timeline[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 03:33, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Single-use template which is not a sidebar. Even further, this is the kind of template that should already be described as the lead in an article. Izno (talk) 03:26, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Subst onto the article. No need for it to be on it's own template space. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 15:06, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Organic fish[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 03:26, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This navigation template is used only on the article for organic fish itself. None of the other articles in the template discuss organic fish, or even mention the term. Epipelagic (talk) 00:24, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).