Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2022 December 5

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

December 5[edit]

Template:Villages in Hasankeyf District[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 23:42, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

All entries have now been redirected so no reason to have this template Semsûrî (talk) 22:42, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Country data templates of non-existent places[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 23:42, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused country data templates of non-existent places. They appear to be non-notable fictional places. V27t (talk) 19:03, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Max Hechtman[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 23:43, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fails MOS:FILM#Navigation and WP:EXISTING, as it links to a single film (itself of questionable notability).

(The article for this non-notable filmmaker, Max Hechtman, was deleted as well.) There are likely COI issues here. DoubleCross () 18:09, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Infobox Soviet Union[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete after replacing with some form of {{native name}} or substituting. Removing the content from the article can certainly happen as well if there is consensus in a discussion on the article's talk page. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 14:30, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Single-use template. Subst and delete. – Jonesey95 (talk) 06:50, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 13:21, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Bengali Wikipedia article graph[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 12:08, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions, documentation, incoming links, or categories. – Jonesey95 (talk) 05:57, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Baseball roster templates[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 03:41, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. –Aidan721 (talk) 02:23, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Redirect to keep history as you copy-pasted the content into parent article. Pelmeen10 (talk) 08:28, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. There are "no transclusions" because the nominator removed all transclusions before starting this TFD. They should be blocked for this disruptive and blatant gaming behaviour. Henriavilla (talk) 18:05, 5 December 2022 (UTC) WP:STRIKESOCK Clyde!Franklin! 01:02, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete While I definitely don't endorse the nominator's behavior here they could just as easily have done this the proper way and say "single-use article content. Should be substituted and deleted" and I would have agreed with them. Since the content of the templates is a non-creative list of names there's no need to keep the history. * Pppery * it has begun... 18:20, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:46, 7 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

World Athletics Championships schedule templates[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was redirect. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:42, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. –Aidan721 (talk) 01:49, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Redirect to keep history as you copy-pasted the content into parent article. Pelmeen10 (talk) 08:22, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. There are "no transclusions" because the nominator removed all transclusions before starting this TFD. They should be blocked for this disruptive and blatant gaming behaviour. Henriavilla (talk) 18:05, 5 December 2022 (UTC) WP:STRIKESOCK Clyde!Franklin! 01:02, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect per Pelmeen10. While I definitely don't endorse the nominator's behavior here they could just as easily have done this the proper way and say "single-use article content. Should be substituted and deleted" and I would have agreed with them. * Pppery * it has begun... 18:20, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:46, 7 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Commonwealth Games calendar and schedule templates[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was redirect. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:01, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. –Aidan721 (talk) 01:32, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Redirect to keep history as you copy-pasted the content into parent article. Pelmeen10 (talk) 08:27, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. There are "no transclusions" because the nominator removed all transclusions before starting this TFD. They should be blocked for this disruptive and blatant gaming behaviour. Henriavilla (talk) 18:05, 5 December 2022 (UTC) WP:STRIKESOCK Clyde!Franklin! 01:02, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect per Pelmeen10. While I definitely don't endorse the nominator's behavior here they could just as easily have done this the proper way and say "single-use article content. Should be substituted and deleted" and I would have agreed with them. * Pppery * it has begun... 18:20, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:46, 7 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Olympic schedule templates[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 03:40, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. –Aidan721 (talk) 01:21, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Redirect to keep history as you copy-pasted the content into parent article. Pelmeen10 (talk) 08:26, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. There are "no transclusions" because the nominator removed all transclusions before starting this TFD. They should be blocked for this disruptive and blatant gaming behaviour. Henriavilla (talk) 18:05, 5 December 2022 (UTC) WP:STRIKESOCK Clyde!Franklin! 01:02, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete While I definitely don't endorse the nominator's behavior here they could just as easily have done this the proper way and say "single-use article content. Should be substituted and deleted" and I would have agreed with them. Since the content of the templates is a non-creative table there's no need to keep the history. * Pppery * it has begun... 18:20, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:46, 7 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).