Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2022 February 26

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< February 25 February 27 >

February 26[edit]

Template:100-day readership[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Replaced with {{Annual readership|days=100|target=...}} Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 16:39, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Barely used template, Equivalent to {{Annual readership}}. Seems little point in maintaining. Change to redirect perhaps or perhaps subst per above (although it uses "page" not "target"). Nigej (talk) 06:07, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:2008 Summer Olympics NOCs[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 05:24, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused except in a user sandbox. Content already exists at 2008 Summer Olympics#Participating National Olympic Committees. Nigej (talk) 06:15, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:2009 Bowling Green Falcons baseball roster[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 05:26, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Roster for Category:Bowling Green Falcons baseball. We don't have any season articles for this team and this is the only roster template for it. Unreferenced and only one blue link, so seems best to delete. Nigej (talk) 06:20, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:South Gippsland line/doc[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 05:20, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions, and not usable, since the parent template uses the shared documentation template {{railway-routemap}}. – Jonesey95 (talk) 06:34, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Star Trek: The Motion Picture set costs[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 05:20, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. I am guessing that this trivial trivia was removed from the one article in which this template was transcluded. – Jonesey95 (talk) 06:39, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. As noted: Trivia, probably already deleted from an article somewhere. Nigej (talk) 08:02, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Vulgar Words[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Deleted as G7. --Trialpears (talk) 19:38, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. Not needed per WP:DISC, Wikipedia:No disclaimers, Wikipedia:Offensive material. – Jonesey95 (talk) 06:45, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete both per nom. Surely some sort of copy-edit template will do. Nigej (talk) 08:00, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Wikidata revenue/PID[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 05:20, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions, incoming links, documentation, or categories. The only edit was creation in 2017. – Jonesey95 (talk) 06:51, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Anabolic and androgenic activities of anabolic steroids[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 05:19, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused group of medical templates whose creator said they aren't needed anymore. Gonnym (talk) 07:42, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:MSB color[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 05:17, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and superseded by Module:Adjacent stations/Munich S-Bahn. Gonnym (talk) 08:02, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:RO-BC[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 05:17, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is a follow-up to Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2022 February 18#Template:RO-B, relating to a style of Romanian county template no longer actively used. Those in the previous list were not used. The current list were used, but only once or twice. I have substituted the text in the articles and these are also now unused. Nigej (talk) 08:08, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Llandovery epoch graphical timeline[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 06:31, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused timelines for geological epochs.Many similar ones were deleted here: Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2021 December 17#Template:Cambrian Series 2 graphical timeline including the closely related {{Ludlow epoch graphical timeline}}. {{Silurian graphical timeline}} is used instead. Nigej (talk) 08:38, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:K.R.Puram Assembly History[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:30, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This template is only used on one page. Can just be copied there -MPGuy2824 (talk) 09:23, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:KR Puram Assembly Labelled Map[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:31, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

used only by one article. can just be substituted there. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 10:02, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:RM Nagar Hospitals[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:33, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

used by only one article. Can just be copied there. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 10:04, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Subst/delete Per nom. Nigej (talk) 14:20, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:RM Nagar Politics[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:33, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

is used by only one page. Should be copied there -MPGuy2824 (talk) 10:06, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Subst/delete Per nom. Nigej (talk) 14:20, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:RM Nagar ward info[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:35, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

is used by only one article. Should be copied there. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 10:07, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Subst/delete Per nom. Nigej (talk) 14:21, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Alloa Railway[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 13:35, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused; the parent article Alloa Railway has several other routemaps already. Mackensen (talk) 12:46, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Succession box/proposed[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 14:06, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sandbox template for proposed changes to Succession boxes from 2008. Can't see any point keeping it. Nigej (talk) 14:10, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Southern League teams[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:18, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused article content for the stadiums used in the Southern League (1964–2020) (baseball). Covered at List of Southern League (1964–2020) stadiums. Nigej (talk) 14:18, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:ShowYear[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:47, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused template to produce a sentence for a "year" article. But eg 2000, 2022 make no mention of Chinese Calendar or astrological calendar and clearly don't use it. {{Year article header}} seems to be preferred. Nigej (talk) 15:15, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Highland Council political representation[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:47, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused table of the political representation of The Highland Council. Nigej (talk) 15:30, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:HOC[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 14:07, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused templates giving the numbers in each party in the House of Commons. The data has not been updated since before the 2019 United Kingdom general election so the numbers returned are wrong anyway. Nigej (talk) 16:24, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Glide ratio examples[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 16:40, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. Content already at Gliding flight#Examples Nigej (talk) 16:29, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Mimi Webb[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 16:41, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Aside from the main article for the artist, there are two articles for her own projects, one of which was only added yesterday. This is premature and should not have been made. The informal rule of five mentioned at WP:NENAN applies here. Ss112 17:44, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. Not required for navigation at the moment. Nigej (talk) 17:49, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • As the creator of the template I am happy for it to be deleted, although I am surprised nobody has created Good Without, 24/5 and Dumb Love articles yet to meet the rule of 5. 03md 13:53, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:EDITSPERUSER[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 17:58, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Currently 1,069,433,957/43,132,581=24.8 but personally I can't see the point of the template. Nigej (talk) 17:53, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Age verification required[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 05:21, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Per User talk:ShakespeareFan00#Template:Age verification required, this template does not serve any valid purpose. * Pppery * it has begun... 18:35, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Soft delete. If certain legislation in the UK passes, this might be needed if sites start enforcing age checks, however that can be handled at a later date, and currently this template has no useful function in Wikipedia, which is NOT CENSORED ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 18:46, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:British Isles Discuss[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:49, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template no longer useful since Wikipedia:British Isles Terminology task force went inactive circa 2010. Suggest removing the maintenance category and then substing and deleting. * Pppery * it has begun... 18:35, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Tower City station[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 17:59, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused "route-maps" for Tower City station. No indication what it relates to, since there's no text. Nigej (talk) 20:01, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep; restored to parent article. (Had been removed with out edit summary.) Useddenim (talk) 21:35, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    However, its still just an unintelligible series of red lines and black bars, but I suppose that's not the issue for us here. Nigej (talk) 06:35, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep What the template displays is relevant to the article. Not a major issue from my standpoint and now it's been restored it can be kept. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 14:47, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:World Day of Prayer[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:37, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"This is a template for individual yearly World Day of Prayer events" but we don't seem have any yearly articles, which is prehaps why it's unused. Nigej (talk) 20:14, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Canada NTS Grid[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:38, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused grid maps and the ID templates display an error code. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:00, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2022_February_26&oldid=1146515558"