Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2022 January 3

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< January 2 January 4 >

January 3[edit]

Template:Yokohama FC Hong Kong squad[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:50, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The team hasn't been Yokohama FC HK since the end of the 2013-14 season. And since the template hasn't featured any links after it was blanked a year ago. No longer necessary to keep. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:20, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Largest municipalities of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 22:34, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused cities template. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:25, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Million-plus cities in Pakistan[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 21:52, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Redundant navbox in comparison to Template:Pakistani cities. All links are included in the cities template. No need for two templates for the same job. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 20:49, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete duplicate, per nom. The link "Million-plus cities in Pakistan" actually takes you to "List of cities in Pakistan by population". Nigej (talk) 21:35, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nominator....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 11:33, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Largest cities of Pakistan[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 21:54, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Single-use template and should be substituted on the Pakistan article. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 20:44, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Year in South Africa/mkLink/*[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 21:58, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I merged all of these into Template:Year in South Africa/mkLink so the subpages are no longer needed. Frietjes (talk) 19:11, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Tornadoes of 2021/Deadly[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 22:31, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A template which holds article content. Used at Tornadoes of 2021 where it should be subst and deleted. {{Tornadoes of 2021}} itself is not used at all and should just be deleted. Gonnym (talk) 17:19, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Subst/delete per nom. Single use article content hidden away for no good reason. Nigej (talk) 17:36, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete 2nd one and keep 1st one I can understand getting rid of the other template since it makes no sense, but deleting the one with the fatalities is not something I agree with. We have been using that for years.ChessEric (talk · contribs) 22:38, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Tinctures[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 22:00, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused as Tincture (heraldry)#List uses a different table. Gonnym (talk) 17:12, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Timeline of US vice presidents[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 22:06, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused timeline template. Vice President of the United States#Timeline uses a different timeline ({{Timeline US Vice Presidents}}). Gonnym (talk) 17:10, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. Nigej (talk) 17:41, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect this one is more grammatically correct as a title for a page -- 65.92.246.142 (talk) 19:09, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Comment though that other template should really be substed and deleted since it is a single use template holding article material, and unlike this template that template isn't formatted as a template. -- 65.92.246.142 (talk) 19:16, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Timeline of US presidents[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 22:00, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused as President of the United States#Timeline of presidents uses a different timeline. Gonnym (talk) 17:09, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Timeline US Open Men's Singles Winners[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 22:01, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused timeline template. The table at List of US Open men's singles champions#US Open does a much better job of presenting this data Gonnym (talk) 17:06, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. Very unsuitbale for an annual event. Nigej (talk) 17:43, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Timeline US Open Women's Singles Winners[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 22:02, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused timeline template. The table at List of US Open women's singles champions#US Open does a much better job of presenting this data. Gonnym (talk) 17:05, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. Very unsuitbale for an annual event. Nigej (talk) 17:43, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Timeline Spain PM Horizontal[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 22:02, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused timeline template. List of prime ministers of Spain#Timeline uses a different timeline. Gonnym (talk) 17:03, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete unused duplicate. Nigej (talk) 17:45, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. I had forgotten this even existed, I guess it serves no meaningful purpose now. Impru20talk 07:32, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Timeline Kingdom of Italy PM Horizontal[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 22:02, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused timeline templates. List of prime ministers of Italy#Timeline uses different timelines. Gonnym (talk) 17:01, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. Unused duplicates. Nigej (talk) 17:46, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Timeline Israeli PM Horizontal[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 22:03, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused timeline template. List of prime ministers of Israel#Term of office in years uses a different timeline. Gonnym (talk) 17:00, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. The article uses different style timelines. Nigej (talk) 17:48, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Timeline Georgetown University presidents[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 22:03, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused timeline template. The only place this could be used is List of presidents of Georgetown University which is a FL, so I don't think they are missing it. Gonnym (talk) 16:59, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Ruam-big[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 22:03, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions, no incoming links, no documentation. Appears to be intended to display flags with national rugby team names, but it is not used. Created in 2007, with no substantive edits since then. Some other flag template is presumably preferred. – Jonesey95 (talk) 15:22, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Musixmatch track[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 22:04, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. Created in 2019, with no substantive edits since then. – Jonesey95 (talk) 15:20, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:UK Railway Pantograph[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 22:04, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. Navbox with no main article and only one link, which is a redirect to a section of Faiveley Transport. – Jonesey95 (talk) 15:15, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete as unused. Clearly useless too at the moment. Nigej (talk) 16:12, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. At best this is massively too soon. Thryduulf (talk) 13:02, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:GCR[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 22:04, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions, no template code. Entire content is a wikilink. – Jonesey95 (talk) 15:13, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Gaselee Expedition[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 22:04, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions, no incoming links, no documentation, no categories. This is unsourced article content for Gaselee Expedition that was created in 2014 and does not appear to have been used there. – Jonesey95 (talk) 15:10, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:GUGG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 22:05, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions, no incoming links, no documentation, no categories. Created in 2015, apparently for a Wikipedia Meetup. – Jonesey95 (talk) 15:06, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:GNU social[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 22:05, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions, no documentation, no incoming links. Created in mid-2019. – Jonesey95 (talk) 15:05, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. User:GKFXtalk 21:31, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:GSE link[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 22:05, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. Created in 2012. If a link without the prefix is needed, {{Ghana Stock Exchange}} could easily be modified with an option like |link=no. – Jonesey95 (talk) 15:01, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Krepšininkas[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 13:55, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above are 2 unused non-English templates created by the same user whose only editors were these. Non-English templates like these should not be used on en.wiki. Gonnym (talk) 13:55, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Infobox restaurant chains[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 13:52, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused but also unneeded. Restaurant chains, such as McDonald's, use {{Infobox company}}. Gonnym (talk) 13:51, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. Best removed before someone uses it. Nigej (talk) 16:05, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment for some reason this template is using the Military History box styles -- 65.92.246.142 (talk) 20:06, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Albums category/type/soundtrack[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 18:32, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The template has not been intended for use since its creation. Q28 (talk) 13:03, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. I've added it to Category:The Beatles soundtracks and it could probably be added to all pages in Category:Soundtracks by artist. I'll note however, that the Template:Albums category and Template:Albums category/type system seems very outdated. The type and performer's name can be extracted automatically from the category name, which would mean that all the /type pages would be unnecessary. Gonnym (talk) 08:53, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 13:45, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:IntFixCal[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was no consensus. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 18:32, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

However, as far as we know, the template is not used. Q28 (talk) 05:23, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It is one purpose template. If it is not needed in the article - it should be deleted. Besides, making such templates not in lua is bad manners on my part ·Carn·!? 07:08, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 11:38, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 13:45, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Hue[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 13:41, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused color template. Gonnym (talk) 13:35, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Hurricane season category[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 13:41, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused hurricane category templates. Gonnym (talk) 13:33, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Holby City series[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 13:41, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused TV template. TV articles use a series overview table like the one found at List of Holby City episodes. Gonnym (talk) 13:30, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Highlight/colors[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was move to Template:Highlight/testcases. ✗plicit 13:44, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused sub template of Template:Highlight, which already offers an example section. Gonnym (talk) 13:23, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. User:GKFXtalk 21:30, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Hebrewmonth[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2022 January 10. ✗plicit 13:42, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:HeatTableC[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 13:02, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused template with no clear indication what article it would fit. Gonnym (talk) 13:00, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Conditional link[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:20, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused template. Intended to simplify {{chem}}, but {{chem/link}} has the same purpose, and simplify {{unichar}}, which again already handles links in its own way. User:GKFXtalk 11:24, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. * Pppery * it has begun... 01:17, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment wouldn't it be better instead to use this template in place of {{chem/link}}, as this is a generalized name, and could be used by others instead of just {{chem}} (by implication) ? -- 65.92.246.142 (talk) 20:34, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Integrate[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:17, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused template to insert , which is more straightforward and more editable if entered directly. User:GKFXtalk 11:15, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Southern line[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:17, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above are unused Southern (Govia Thameslink Railway) templates. Gonnym (talk) 10:16, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Lyon Bus icon[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:17, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused transportation icon templates. Gonnym (talk) 10:07, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:U.S. presidential ticket box row 2016[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:17, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused election templates. Gonnym (talk) 09:48, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Infobox residential college/font color[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:16, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused sub templates of Template:Infobox residential college. Gonnym (talk) 09:38, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Infobox legislation/color[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:16, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused sub template of Template:Infobox legislation. Gonnym (talk) 09:36, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2022_January_3&oldid=1064941473"