Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2022 January 30

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< January 29 January 31 >

January 30[edit]

Sounder commuter rail s-line templates[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 16:21, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

{{S-line}} templates for Sounder commuter rail. Superseded by Module:Adjacent stations/Sound Transit. Mackensen (talk) 19:20, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Only used on a very old user sandbox. Gonnym (talk) 23:17, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Would seem that the other services covered by the module (such as Template:STLinkLR lines) are only used in a couple of user's sandboxes. Gonnym (talk) 11:06, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: Mackensen, please ensure that each of the nominated templates is properly tagged and that their creators have been notified, per the normal process. – Jonesey95 (talk) 06:28, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:DDL Tournaments[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:04, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

All articles included in this template were deleted through PRODs so it is unused. Liz Read! Talk! 19:10, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. No links Nigej (talk) 19:16, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Ddl tournaments[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:04, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused; all links now deleted. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 19:08, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. No links Nigej (talk) 19:16, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Cincinnati Subway s-line templates[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 16:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

{{S-line}} templates for the Cincinnati Subway. Superseded by Module:Adjacent stations/Cincinnati Subway. Mackensen (talk) 18:57, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Gonnym (talk) 23:19, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: Mackensen, please ensure that each of the nominated templates is properly tagged and that their creators have been notified, per the normal process. – Jonesey95 (talk) 06:28, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Unused Pas de templates[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 16:15, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused templates relating to ballet. There are a total of 20 of these templates at Category:Ballet templates but this nomination only covers 7 unused ones. The others are used at sub-pages of User:Robertgreer/sandbox/NYCB. Following this TfD: Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2012 February 19#Ballet multicolumn formatting templates and this AfD Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of New York City Ballet 2012 repertory, the articles that used these have, I believe, all been deleted. Another of these was deleted recently Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2021 December 3#Template:Pas de onze 5W6M. Nigej (talk) 18:53, 30 January 2022 (UTC).[reply]

Delete all as unused. I would also delete the complete set as they are only used in a single editor's very old sandboxes. Gonnym (talk) 23:23, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Localparties danish regional 2013[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:04, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Used only on Talk:2017 Danish local elections. Best to be substituted on there as it is unlikely for this to be used on any relevant spaces. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:50, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Subst/delete per nom. Single-use article (in this case, talk page) content. Nigej (talk) 18:04, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Folketing members category navigation[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:03, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template with a chart design format for the Folketing member categories. But hard to easily navigate through or with and takes up a lot of space on the category pages. Best to just navigate with Category:Members of the Folketing by term. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:50, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. Actually a handicap to navigation since it takes up the whole initial screen. Surely {{Navseasoncats}} or similar would be much better, but I'm no expert. Nigej (talk) 17:19, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Turkish Open Tournaments[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 16:23, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fewer than five links. Fails NENAN. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:21, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete both Two darts tournaments. In one case we have 2, the other 3, events for which there are articles. Realistically readers are going to navigate via the parent articles and perhaps the infobox. Nigej (talk) 16:30, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Japanese Collaboration candidate[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 16:14, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not active since 2007 and still used on talk pages. Remove and delete. Gonnym (talk) 16:16, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete There are no "candidates" any more. Best cleared out. Nigej (talk) 16:31, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Wikipedia:Collaboration of the week/Template:Past cotw[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 16:04, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Used as a template on article talk pages for a process that has been dead since 2016. Usages should be removed and template deleted. Nominating its unused siblings as well so it won't be used in the future. Gonnym (talk) 16:01, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom and previous similar deletions. Nigej (talk) 07:40, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Hampton Roads Transit s-line templates[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:55, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

{{S-line}} templates for Hampton Roads Transit. Superseded by Module:Adjacent stations/Hampton Roads Transit. Mackensen (talk) 15:44, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Gonnym (talk) 23:24, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: Mackensen, please ensure that each of the nominated templates is properly tagged and that their creators have been notified, per the normal process. – Jonesey95 (talk) 06:28, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Welcome-Child[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:53, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I understand the intention with which this was created but worry that the benefits of this sparsely-used template are outweighed by at least two issues. First, I don't think we should be adding a specific template to the talk pages of users that we think are young children. Second, there is a possibility that the recipient will interpret the second paragraph as a prompt to confirm whether they are a young child, which they should not do if they actually are. Using one of the generic welcome templates and taking a more discreet approach would be preferable. DanCherek (talk) 15:27, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm leaning delete in support of nom's argument of outing a young editor. It might be worth adding a line about young editors to the standard template. Gonnym (talk) 15:35, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not keen. As noted, it might be used to try and get a response from a child, exactly the opposite of its intention. Nigej (talk) 20:43, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Tren Urbano s-line templates[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 15:05, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

{{S-line}} templates for Tren Urbano. Superseded by Module:Adjacent stations/Tren Urbano. Mackensen (talk) 14:58, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Gonnym (talk) 15:38, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: Mackensen, please ensure that each of the nominated templates is properly tagged and that their creators have been notified, per the normal process. – Jonesey95 (talk) 06:28, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Honolulu Rail Transit s-line templates[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 15:04, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

{{S-line}} templates for Honolulu Rail Transit. Superseded by Module:Adjacent stations/Honolulu Rail Transit. Mackensen (talk) 14:58, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Gonnym (talk) 15:39, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: Mackensen, please ensure that each of the nominated templates is properly tagged and that their creators have been notified, per the normal process. – Jonesey95 (talk) 06:28, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Chicago, Rock Island and Pacific Railroad s-line templates[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 15:04, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

{{S-line}} templates for the Chicago, Rock Island and Pacific Railroad. Superseded by Module:Adjacent stations/Chicago, Rock Island and Pacific Railroad. Mackensen (talk) 14:58, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Gonnym (talk) 15:39, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: Mackensen, please ensure that each of the nominated templates is properly tagged and that their creators have been notified, per the normal process. – Jonesey95 (talk) 06:28, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Portland s-line templates[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:57, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

{{S-line}} templates for various services in the Portland, Oregon area. Superseded by Module:Adjacent stations/TriMet and Module:Adjacent stations/Portland Streetcar. Mackensen (talk) 14:50, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Gonnym (talk) 15:39, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: Mackensen, please ensure that each of the nominated templates is properly tagged and that their creators have been notified, per the normal process. – Jonesey95 (talk) 06:28, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Tributary of Iecava river[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Creation of a broader template can be handled irrespective of this closure. ✗plicit 13:36, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused Latvian river navboxes, mostly red links Nigej (talk) 13:28, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete or create a Template:Rivers in Latvia navbox with other river articles. Gonnym (talk) 23:31, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
See Category:Rivers of Latvia. If decided to create, I can handle this (please ping). Gonnym (talk) 15:34, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:United Kingdom submarine template below links[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 13:34, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Intended to provide a standard 2 links in the below section of submarine templates, but is unused since all the templates in Category:United Kingdom submarine templates: {{A class submarine (1903)}}, etc. have the 2 links hardwired. Nigej (talk) 12:32, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. It might have been useful if used while creating the other templates, but since they are already using hardcoded links, and the links themselves should be stable, there isn't really a compelling argument to use this. Gonnym (talk) 15:33, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Dreadnought-class submarine[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2022 February 6. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 16:21, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Extended techniques[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge to Template:Musical techniques. ✗plicit 13:34, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is the second time this has been nominated after the last one went unopposed before being closed. The main gist is that the contents of this template have been absorbed into the larger Template:Musical techniques. Why? I Ask (talk) 12:07, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Voting in ... templates[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:02, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sidebars containing mostly external links. However WP:SIDEBAR specficially says "external links should not be included in navigation templates." I know we're trying to provide a public service but this is not the way. A sidebar is ... "a grouping of links used in multiple related articles to facilitate navigation between those articles in Wikipedia". These are nothing like that. Nigej (talk) 11:58, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I agree with nom here. These sidebar templates aren't navigation templates and their external link usage seems very out of place. Unless a compelling argument is made, I'm leaning delete here. Gonnym (talk) 23:26, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
and the use of "plainlinks" to hide the fact that they're external links is particularly poor IMO Nigej (talk) 16:01, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Didn't even notice that! Gonnym (talk) 15:30, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete More external links than internal links to article on Wikipedia. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 17:24, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Wawel map[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was no consensus. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:08, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused clickable map, mostly red links. Following a WP:BLANKANDREDIRECT in 2020 the article where it was used Wawel now redirects to Wawel Castle. It either needs using or deleting, leaving it lying around in the ether is no use to anyone. Nigej (talk) 08:33, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Very easy to fix (I've added it to Wawel). Seems useful and I am sure we can find many places to use it, no idea why it was depreciated. Someone(s) put a lot of work into making it, with clickable links and everything. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 08:49, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:World Artistic Gymnastics Championships medal table[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:59, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused medal header. Used to be used at articles like 2011 World Artistic Gymnastics Championships – Women's vault but all such articles have been WP:BLANKANDREDIRECT to the parent articles and this template is no longer of use. Nigej (talk) 08:15, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Also design-wise it isn't built with modern usage so would need to be rebuilt anyways. Gonnym (talk) 15:28, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:AWG Volleyball[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 02:53, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

All unused; all red links now that link here. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 02:45, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment I have taken the liberty of combining these related items into one list. Nigej (talk) 07:12, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete The only realistic conclusion now that all the content has been deleted. Nigej (talk) 07:13, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, none link anything. Cavalryman (talk) 08:20, 30 January 2022 (UTC).[reply]
  • Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page discussions. GiantSnowman 20:24, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. GiantSnowman 20:28, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Events at the 2014 Arctic Winter Games[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 02:53, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused; All links deleted via PROD. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 02:45, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom and previous TfDs in this area. Nigej (talk) 07:13, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2022_January_30&oldid=1070314804"