Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2023 January 27

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:15, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unused template that shows a logo instead of a flag (note that Hololive is a "virtual YouTuber agency", so I can't see a possible use of this template). V27t (talk) 19:19, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:19, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

unused after being merged with the parent article with attribution. Frietjes (talk) 17:23, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:20, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

unused after being merged with the parent article with attribution. Frietjes (talk) 17:23, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:21, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

unused after being merged with the parent article with attribution. Frietjes (talk) 17:23, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:21, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

unused after being merged with the parent article with attribution. Frietjes (talk) 17:23, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:07, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unused in mainspace. Recommend delete. Izno (talk) 06:53, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:08, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unused in mainspace. Izno (talk) 06:39, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete after merging with List of Minnesota companies Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:15, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Single-use template. Recommend subst and delete. Izno (talk) 06:38, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:42, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Single-use template. Recommend subst and delete. Izno (talk) 06:29, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Feel free to move some or part of it from Chihuahua (state) to Municipalities of Chihuahua. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:52, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Single-use template. Recommend subst and delete. Izno (talk) 06:23, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:47, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Single-use template. Recommend subst and delete. Izno (talk) 06:16, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:18, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Single-use template. Recommend subst and delete. Izno (talk) 06:15, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Subst per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 01:47, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • I created this table for one specific purpose: to fit in as small a space as possible the minimum useful information to guide those readers (like me) who lose track of the dozen-odd PM's from Lord Melbourne to Lord Salisbury and of the several switches between Disraeli and Gladstone. Someone else converted it to a template, which I agree is unnecessary because its usefulness (e.g. not including Canadian PM's or other 19-century ones) is really only limited to that one page, Queen Victoria. However,
  1. I'd really like someone to reconvert the template to the original table (as subsequently modified) and post it to Queen Victoria, and
  2. It's possible that a far more general template might be constructed to accommodate articles about heads of state with over a dozen chief miniters (e.g. King George III, Queen Elizabeth II and the Emperor Hirohito). —— Shakescene (talk) 19:41, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
¶ I WP:boldly went ahead and replaced this single-use template at Queen Victoria#Years with Albert with my original table (as modified). So, unless someone wants to create a fill-in-the-blanks skeleton template for the chief ministers (or any other officers) of any other head of state, I see no problem in deleting thus template. —— Shakescene (talk) 07:54, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 16:01, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Single-use template. Recommend subst and delete. Izno (talk) 06:08, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 16:01, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Single-use template. Recommend subst and delete. Izno (talk) 06:07, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was history merge. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 16:01, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may think this is the main template for classifying guidelines as guidelines but it's not. That would be {{Subcat guideline}} which put pages in a subcategory of Category:Wikipedia guidelines and is used by all guidelines after I categorized the last 4. After deletion (or move to a suitable place to preserve page history, I'm not picky) {{Subcat guideline}} can take the name making for a more intuitive naming scheme. --Trialpears (talk) 04:49, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request undeletion of these templates. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 14:35, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Both unused. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 01:51, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 14:34, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 01:46, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 14:33, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unused maps of regions of Iran. No longer needed. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 01:21, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:15, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have 3D glasses accessible when reading Wikipedia and want an extra dimension when viewing your images? Then this is the template for you! If you are one of the other 99.99% of Wikipedia readers this template can add a useless and slightly distracting link to your articles. This template is also used a grand total of two times for it's intended purpose. --Trialpears (talk) 01:12, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:17, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Substituted on the main article. No longer needed. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 01:00, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:17, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Both unused and blanked. Both current squad sections on both team articles were removed. Assuming there aren't articles for current players hence the removal on the articles and navboxes. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:52, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:16, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unused with only one link. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:50, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:16, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and only three links to articles. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:49, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:16, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and not needed as the list is on the Oud-Heverlee Leuven article under the U23 section. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:48, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).