Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2023 May 30

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 23:50, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Doesn't appear to be in use today as an apparent result of never having been incorporated to various procedures. I don't honestly see a future for it either. Izno (talk) 21:48, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 23:50, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Had 2 transclusions left which were replaced with Module:Adjacent stations/Tramways in Île-de-France. Now unused. Gonnym (talk) 20:37, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 20:21, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

subst: into article and delete, only used on one article, no need for a separate template. Timelines are routinely inserted into articles directly. ―Justin (koavf)TCM 19:54, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 20:21, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

subst: into article and delete, only used on one article, no need for a separate template. Timelines are routinely inserted into articles directly. ―Justin (koavf)TCM 19:54, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Unused s-line templates

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 14:40, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unused s-line templates. Gonnym (talk) 18:56, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 14:41, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

unused, looks like the articles are using the unmerged standings templates instead. I don't care which ones are used, but we don't need the ones that are unused. Frietjes (talk) 17:33, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 20:21, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Only 3 season articles (and so only 4 blue links including the parent article), and all can be reached via Royal League or via the previous/next editions in the infoboxes anyway. Joseph2302 (talk) 17:03, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 14:42, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

no longer needed after recent TfD of the templates populating the categories Frietjes (talk) 15:29, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

2018 Winter Paralympics para ice hockey templates

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 14:42, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

current convention for Olympics and Paralympics is to place these in the main article and transclude using WP:LST to avoid creating/watching dozens of templates per competition. Frietjes (talk) 15:48, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

2018 Winter Paralympics wheelchair curling templates

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 14:42, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

current convention for Olympics and Paralympics is to place these in the main article and transclude using WP:LST to avoid creating/watching 70 templates per competition. Frietjes (talk) 15:58, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 15:21, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is article content intended for use as a table in two articles, but since it uses the navbox template, it is not visible in mobile view. It should be converted into a table or list and placed in one of the articles, from which section transclusion can be used to include it in the other article if necessary. – Jonesey95 (talk) 04:15, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If it should go anywhere of those 2 articles then it is Australian English vocabulary. However, the content should be reformatted as either prose or an actual table and not that mess. Also, this seems a bit WP:OR but I haven't checked it too deeply. Gonnym (talk) 07:37, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 14:46, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This navbox is used in only one article, and it is more a summary of one person's achievements and associations than a set of articles that should be mutually linked to one another. It should be deleted, with all relevant and sourced content moved to the parent article. – Jonesey95 (talk) 04:10, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).