Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2023 November 18

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was speedy delete per author request. plicit 12:10, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Absurdly large navbox with no main article. I am not an expert on the topic, but this navbox appears to contain links to items that do not fit the stated criteria, e.g. United Nations Security Council Resolution 509, which is about Israel and Lebanon. Category:United Nations Security Council resolutions concerning the Israeli–Palestinian conflict should suffice to link the relevant articles to one another. – Jonesey95 (talk) 01:35, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I mean ... the information might be better as a list, but it's a valid aggregation. Iskandar323 (talk) 13:14, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I've spot checked a few links and the creator has placed anything Arab-Israeli in this navbox and not just Israeli–Palestinian (United Nations Security Council Resolution 501 as an example). So at the minimum, the links to be verified as fitting. Gonnym (talk) 14:02, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 00:51, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 08:35, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment: Still no transclusions after two relistings. It appears that nobody is finding this overwhelming navbox usable. I clicked on six articles at random in the navbox, and I found that none of the articles mentioned both Israel and Palestine by name. OK to userfy if the creator wants to work on narrowing the scope of this navbox, perhaps to the articles in the category linked above, so that it serves the actual purpose of a navbox. – Jonesey95 (talk) 19:58, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. I will save the list in Nine News#Presenters, but feel free to remove it, move it, or split it into another list article. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:31, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Textbook WP:PERFNAV, as presenters on a television program. Yours sincerely, TechGeek105 (his talk page) 03:46, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Pinging @Woodensuperman, who nominated the other Australian television news presenter templates, to leave his opinion. Yours sincerely, TechGeek105 (his talk page) 03:50, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 08:35, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2023 November 30. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:13, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 11:24, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A recent bundled AFD nomination (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1979 Sligo Intermediate Football Championship) resulted in the deletion of many articles listed on this template. Currently, there are no existing articles that this template links to so I don't think it is serving a purpose. Liz Read! Talk! 01:19, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 11:21, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicates main article's section, Conversion of scales of temperature#Comparison. Only transcluded in Temperature measurement, where it's tangentially related. Already nominated for deletion 15 years ago but procedurally closed. fgnievinski (talk) 01:18, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.