Jump to content

Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2018 August 17

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Help desk
< August 16 << Jul | August | Sep >> August 18 >
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is an archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.


August 17[edit]

03:41:02, 17 August 2018 review of submission by Anonymous1941[edit]


I don't want to make the same mistake again. The problem is my draft reads like a blow-by-blow account of her harassment and depression. I want my draft to be a summary of the events leading up to her suicide and the events that occurred after it. I have tried my best to fix the tone of the draft but it never worked, can someone please help me by editing the draft by making it look like a summary of the events leading up to her suicide. I would really appreciate it. Thank you.


Anonymous1941 (talk) 03:41, 17 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It needs work, for sure. I'm willing to assist and have noted such on the Draft. It may take me a few days, however, just FYI. StrikerforceTalk 18:14, 17 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 05:54:21, 17 August 2018 for assistance on AfC submission by Ronita Bhattacharya[edit]


I want to publish my Wikipedia Page Kuasha Jakhon. It's long time spent, My page is not published. I want to publish Movie page, Kuasha Jakhon. How many time will be required for published my page. If there is any problem create for publishing issues. Please mention this.


Ronita Bhattacharya (talk) 05:54, 17 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User has published their page, which has since been nominated for deletion as a non-notable movie. StrikerforceTalk 18:09, 17 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

06:39:27, 17 August 2018 review of submission by Lucmar10[edit]


I am not understanding why my page was declined and am looking for guidance.

Lucmar10 (talk) 06:39, 17 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Lucmar10 Greetings. There are two panels on top of the draft page have indicated the reasons of whey the draft article have been declined. If you click on the "blue highlighted texts" they will lead you to another pages where details info will be given. Basically, a article would only be accepted by Wikipedia if the subject is notable where the subject has been talk about in independence, reliable sources such as reputable newspaper. Sources from homepage, fb, listing, utube, marketing pieces, interviews are considered not reliable and / or not independence. At the current stage, the subject is not notable to be accepted as a stand alone page in Wikipedia main space. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 09:49, 17 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

08:00:23, 17 August 2018 review of submission by 109.98.165.185[edit]


Oh yet. It has been declined previously & rejected by Strikerforce because it has ineligible or insufficient reilable sources to verify WP:Notability. Now Alex4ff submitted again (2'nd time). 109.98.165.185 (talk) 08:00, 17 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Alex4ff Greetings. See below and kindly rework.
  1. Pls provide in line citation on unsrouced sections and citations needed sections.
  2. Pls provide page number for sources from books and PDF as there are hundred of pages on each book where reviewers would not be reading thousand pages just to find where you got the info from.
  3. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 10:28, 17 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

12:03:02, 17 August 2018 review of submission by Nishaarya[edit]


I understand your point now, but please give me the option to re-submit it again as i have removed all the links other than times of india and zee news as u mentioned I know its a small artice now but still all details are relevant to the concerned person

Nishaarya (talk) 12:03, 17 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again Nishaarya. No, you do not understand the point. Athar Siddiqui is not notable, so Wikipedia will not accept an article about him, however small. --Worldbruce (talk) 13:43, 17 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

16:15:22, 17 August 2018 review of submission by 197.242.119.226[edit]


197.242.119.226 (talk) 16:15, 17 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Non-notable work by an author that hasn't been shown to meet general notability guidelines. Without properly asserting those two things within a properly referenced article, there's not anything that can be done for this submission, unfortunately. StrikerforceTalk 17:55, 17 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

18:43:13, 17 August 2018 review of submission by NYTimes Writer[edit]


NYTimes Writer (talk) 18:43, 17 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]