Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2018 July 12
| Help desk | ||
|---|---|---|
| < July 11 | << Jun | July | Aug >> | July 13 > |
| Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives |
|---|
| The page you are currently viewing is an archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages. |
July 12[edit]
13:49:44, 12 July 2018 review of submission by MP mccoy[edit]
I am writing about a company located in Lagos that is doing some great works in the interior design space here in Africa. I feel it is good they are on WIKI too. I have followed them up for some time now. and they are quite notable in their in their industry.
MP mccoy (talk) 13:49, 12 July 2018 (UTC)
- MP mccoy - Being "notable in their industry" is not how Wikipedia denotes notability (And therefor, eligibility for an article on Wikipedia). Your article needs references that are independent of the subject that discuss the subject in depth. The referencing is currently not enough. Provided it is notable, you should be able to provide these references. Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 14:03, 12 July 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I am Dr. Valente's assistant and trying to get his Wikipedia page published. He is the author, I am just the transcriber of his information, so there is no conflict of interest. Please let me know how we can get this published sooner than later. Does he need to create an account with Wikipedia and submit through his account?
Ljugador 20:25, 12 July 2018 (UTC)
- Hi Ljugador. Clearly you have misunderstood what a conflict of interest is. There is no greater conflict of interest than Thomas W. Valente authoring the biography of Thomas W. Valente, see autobiography and Wikipedia:Conflicts of interest (medicine). Having an assistant (you) type it up doesn't avoid the potential problems. Nor would submitting it through his own account. Continuing to try to get this published would be foolhardy. If you persist nonetheless, then it is essential that you follow the advice that reviewers have left on the draft. --Worldbruce (talk) 22:31, 12 July 2018 (UTC)
21:51:00, 12 July 2018 review of submission by Mooshhhh[edit]
It seems there is a high bar for being notable. I noticed a lot of other references in Books and articles that Wikipedia lists for my subject. Should I put more in? Can you look at my draft? Am I wasting my time or am I close? Thanks! Subject - Tamsin Astor, PhD Mooshhhh (talk) 21:51, 12 July 2018 (UTC)
- Hi Mooshhhh. Notability is a high bar. Anyone can have pages on Facebook and LinkedIn, but very few people are suitable subjects for an encyclopedia biography. So you may be wasting your time. Quality of references is much more important than quantity. Novice editors are often advised to cite at least three independent, reliable, secondary sources that contain significant coverage of the subject. Although the draft cites four sources, each lacks something - mostly independence and significant coverage - so you are not close. You effectively have zero of the three sources you need.
- If you're hoping to demonstrate notability as an academic or an author, study WP:PROF and WP:CREATIVE. Probably the easiest route would be to demonstrate notability via reviews of her book, but that still isn't easy. When, earlier this year, editors debated whether to delete the biography of an author whose works had full length reviews in eight prominent sources, including The Times (London), The New York Review of Books, The Times Literary Supplement, The New York Times, and The Economist, editors recommended that the biography be deleted rather than kept by an almost two to one margin. --Worldbruce (talk) 23:32, 12 July 2018 (UTC)