Jump to content

Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2018 October 23

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Help desk
< October 22 << Sep | October | Nov >> October 24 >
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is an archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.


October 23

[edit]

00:52:33, 23 October 2018 review of draft by Jiaxin He

[edit]


Jiaxin He (talk) 00:52, 23 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi , I have a question is that my article found in requested article at beginning , now it said already exited. This is my university assignment , I have to submit it , what should I do?
Your article is better and has sources. Just paste your content over the existing content. I would do it but then you would not get the credit. You or anyone can then redirect the draft at the article or let it get deleted in 6 months. Legacypac (talk) 01:00, 23 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

07:15:46, 23 October 2018 review of draft by Ameliemacp

[edit]

Ameliemacp (talk) 07:20, 23 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Kendall_Vertes -->}}

I have requested this page to be reviewed and was advised to post it here as it is create protected due to numerous deletions by other users last submitted in 2017 however i believe my article to be worthy of being published please review and adviseAmeliemacp (talk) 07:15, 23 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

10:53:01, 23 October 2018 review of submission by Thameem.syed1

[edit]


Thameem.syed1 (talk) 10:53, 23 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 13:38:40, 23 October 2018 for assistance on AfC submission by Sand1205

[edit]


Hello,

Thank you for your feedback on my article.

Can you explain more why it has been refused?

I have included recent, reliable and secondary sources that are independent to the subject. Moreover this association works and is recognized by the FEI (International Equestrian Federation) which is the governing body of equestrian sports.

What should I add ?

Thank you for your help and advices,

Sand1205 Sand1205 (talk) 13:38, 23 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Generally a reviewer will be looking for significantly more reliable sources, news reports, magazines and other publications. This is to show that the subject is relevant enough for a Wikipedia article. The more attention an organisation gets in reliable sources the more notable it is, and a minimum level of notability is needed. — Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 13:48, 23 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

14:06:10, 23 October 2018 review of draft by Jbor14

[edit]


I think the article titled needs to be changed from Professor_Joseph_Borg to Joseph_Borg_(scientist) I don’t want to stall or halt the review process and that’s why I’m asking the question here. Many thanks for your kind help. Professor Joseph Borg 14:06, 23 October 2018 (UTC)

Thanks so much for this ! Truly appreciated Kindest regards — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jbor14 (talkcontribs) 14:23, 23 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

15:27:25, 23 October 2018 review of submission by Kristendhunt

[edit]

Could anyone review Draft: David Reingold for any errors that might keep it from being published? Thank you

Kristendhunt (talk) 15:27, 23 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

16:08:28, 23 October 2018 review of draft by Mlajum

[edit]


I want to find out if its possible to start writing another draft while my first draft article is pending review. And if so, how do I go about it? Thanks

Mlajum (talk) 16:08, 23 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Of course you can write on different topics. I suggest new users work to improve existing topics to get a better feel for what is acceptable and how Wikipedia works before trying to create new topics. Legacypac (talk) 16:15, 23 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

19:01:19, 23 October 2018 review of submission by MatusPavkeje

[edit]


My article was missing a reference links so I added it

MatusPavkeje (talk) 19:01, 23 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

19:04:33, 23 October 2018 review of draft by SSH06

[edit]


When looking at a similar business' wikipedia page, Rauland Borg, I don't see that their article had any more independent references than I included in the Amplion Clinical Communications article, which was reviewed and rejected. Can someone explain the difference? Thanks!19:04, 23 October 2018 (UTC)SSH06 (talk) SSH06 (talk) 19:04, 23 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS and we are all volunteers who can't catch everything, but I'll look at the other page. Legacypac (talk) 19:10, 23 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Basically that company has a very long history. Legacypac (talk) 19:14, 23 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]