Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2020 April 18
Help desk | ||
---|---|---|
< April 17 | << Mar | April | May >> | April 19 > |
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives |
---|
The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages. |
April 18
[edit]00:24:52, 18 April 2020 review of submission by Sahagunethan
[edit]- Sahagunethan (talk · contribs)
Sahagunethan (talk) 00:24, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
03:00:57, 18 April 2020 review of draft by Susleman
[edit]
I've been informed that the notability of the BLP is in question due to the fact that roles to date have not been leads. Both Brandon Hardy in "Good Boys" at the Pasadena Playhouse, and Brad Kirchoff in "When the Streetlights Go On" for Quibi are considered leads. What can I do to prove this other than what is already provided?
Susleman (talk) 03:00, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
- Susleman, The decline message should likely have been expanded to say lead roles in notable productions. If the film they had a lead in is not wiki notable, or if the play they were in wasn't in one of the premier playhouses or part of a touring broadway show, then it will do very little if nothing to establish notability. The decline was appropriate. Notability has not been estabslihed for this subject and it's likely they are not notable at all at this time. Sulfurboy (talk) 03:23, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
I recently published a draft for a wikipedia article on an Academic Research Journal where the major references were the journal itself, its SCImago and Resurchify Data, and information about the founders from the University of Canberra website. My draft was declined and I received feedback that the references weren't credible enough to warrant publishing the draft article. So, my question is how can I find references that are more credible than academic peer reviewed sources? PHansen.Research (talk) 09:09, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
- PHansen.Research Most of the sources you have offered merely cite the contents of the journal; the journal itself would be a primary source and not establish notability. A Wikipedia article should only summarize what independent reliable sources with significant coverage say about the journal, showing how it meets the Wikipedia definition of a notable academic journal. Please read Your First Article for more information. 331dot (talk) 09:16, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
10:02:15, 18 April 2020 review of draft by SunnyBoi
[edit]
Hello AfC Help Desk, I am hoping for some help with an article submission which has been declined because of the original author's COI.
Most of the content of the page has been rewritten since they created it, I have added most of the references and removed promotional and unsourced material.
Would it still be considered as not being NPOV because of the original source? I do not have any links with the organisation so would my edits be considered NPOV?
Thank you for your advice and time. SunnyBoi (talk) 10:02, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
SunnyBoi (talk) 10:02, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
11:14:27, 18 April 2020 review of submission by THEBIOGRAPHYMASTER
[edit]11:14:27, 18 April 2020 review of submission by THEBIOGRAPHYMASTER}}
THEBIOGRAPHYMASTER (talk) 11:14, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
i just created an article for Nikka Starr and i want you to re-review it.
- THEBIOGRAPHYMASTER it has been reviewed 5 times, there is nothing at all to show any notability at all, this appears to just be promotion. Wikipedia is not social media KylieTastic (talk) 11:33, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
11:38:02, 18 April 2020 review of submission by Paintitkid
[edit]- Paintitkid (talk · contribs)
Hello,
Have added the relevant news articles covering the person. The subject has won 2 awards and has been featured in all major news outlets in the state. One could classify him as a 'celebrity'. He is a notable personality in the state of Kerala, India (population 32 million). Please do reconsider.
Paintitkid (talk) 11:38, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
12:09:21, 18 April 2020 review of submission by THEBIOGRAPHYMASTER
[edit]
THEBIOGRAPHYMASTER (talk) 12:09, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
- Your draft has been rejected, the topic is not notable and Wikipedia cannot be used as a source. Theroadislong (talk) 12:28, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
12:41:40, 18 April 2020 review of submission by THEBIOGRAPHYMASTER
[edit]12:41:40, 18 April 2020 review of submission by THEBIOGRAPHYMASTER
THEBIOGRAPHYMASTER (talk) 12:41, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
so i have done some edits and im so sorry for the picture i am not the person i write in and i am not paid i uploaded the pictures because i want to show the public who i am wrting about but i will find another image that is not my own work and i am sure and i will tell to you that i am not person im writing i am just a biography writer of a notable person
- THEBIOGRAPHYMASTER they are not notable at all and your just wasting our time. KylieTastic (talk) 14:17, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
14:24:52, 18 April 2020 review of draft by TheBirdsShedTears
[edit]
Please review this draft as part of AfC help desk. Thank you!
TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 14:24, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
- @TheBirdsShedTears: You have submitted your draft today. There are Currently 1,969 submissions awaiting review, some of which are waiting 8 weeks already. Reviewing your submission right now would be unfair. Victor Schmidt (talk) 15:54, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
- Also see WP:NOTNEWS, and your draft contains opinions and original research which is not appropriate. Theroadislong (talk) 15:59, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
15:17:59, 18 April 2020 review of submission by Haitypicky
[edit]- Haitypicky (talk · contribs)
Greetings,
I believe the page has enough citations and the information is absolute.
Thanks
- Haitypicky it's not about the number of citations but having significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources. All you have added is wikis that are not reliable sources. Cheers KylieTastic (talk) 15:31, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
19:59:55, 18 April 2020 review of submission by Zayj27
[edit]BhaatBank is a small organization gives out something that is not easily available in Bangladesh, food. And especially during this COVID-19 Pandemic, they have raised thousands of dollars for the wages and well being of those put out of work during this time, which in Bangladesh is a substantial amount of the population. BhaatBank has continuously given out food and clothing to those who need it despite the situation. BhaatBank should deserve this recognition for working through this pandemic alongside the doctors and first responders for helping the poor on the streets while the rest stay home. The volunteers at BhaatBank are volunteers that believe that Bangladesh, a country the size of New York with a population of 164 million people can be saved one by one and that every person counts. Thank You for re-reviewing this article. Zayj27 (talk) 19:59, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
- Zayj27 That's a great cause, and I hope the organization is successful, but Wikipedia is not for telling the world about good causes or as a form of "recognition" for organizations or causes. This is an encyclopedia; as an encyclopedia, Wikipedia summarizes what independent reliable sources state with significant coverage about subjects that meet Wikipedia's special definition of notability(in this case, the definition of a notable organization). Not every organization merits an article here, regardless of what it does. If you just want to tell the world about this organization, you should use social media or an alternative forum where what you want to do is permitted. 331dot (talk) 20:05, 18 April 2020 (UTC)