Jump to content

Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2022 January 26

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Help desk
< January 25 << Dec | January | Feb >> January 27 >
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.


January 26[edit]

03:53:21, 26 January 2022 review of submission by Adeelkhanwwc[edit]


Adeelkhanwwc (talk) 03:53, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

07:29:37, 26 January 2022 review of draft by Arunudoy[edit]


I am requesting a review on the draft page because I am blamed for "a WP:UPE or WP:COI conflict", for which I am too stressed. I have never created an article here for the money, nor even I will. I have no connection or relation with the subject person. The subject person is notable, I have added reputed citations too. Moreover, a simple click on notability factors will justify. Arunudoy (talk) 07:29, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • I would like to mention some of the top citations as below:

1] https://time.com/6092299/india-anti-immigrant-crackdown-assam/
2] https://www.nytimes.com/2021/10/17/world/asia/india-assam-muslim-evictions.html
3] https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/what-is-afspa-and-why-is-it-controversial/articleshow/88126265.cms
4] https://www.thestatesman.com/opinion/of-outrageous-fortune-1503031682.html
5] https://www.trtworld.com/magazine/unrest-in-india-s-northeastern-frontier-may-morph-into-a-big-problem-49109
6] https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2021/3/25/stress-on-hindu-identity-bjp-hate-campaign-in-poll-bound-assam
7] https://thewire.in/politics/the-economic-basis-of-assams-linguistic-politics-and-anti-immigrant-movements

I hope such is more than enough as there are more citations like https://www.nytimes.com/search?query=%22Sanjib%2BBaruah%22, https://www.google.com/search?tbs=bks:1&q=%22Sanjib+Baruah%22+-wikipedia, https://cse.google.com/cse?hl=en&cx=007734830908295939403:galkqgoksq0&cof=FORID:13%3BAH:left%3BCX:Wikipedia%2520Reference%2520Search&q=%22Sanjib+Baruah%22, https://www.jstor.org/action/doBasicSearch?Query=%22Sanjib+Baruah%22&acc=on&wc=on&so=rel, and all mentioned by Wikipdia.

Regards- Arunudoy (talk) 08:26, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Arunudoy: In the sources you list above, only TRT World describes Baruah as a global expert. The other sources are only passing mentions, where Baruah isn't the subject. You might have more luck if you can find some book reviews for his work and use those to cite the books. TechnoTalk (talk) 22:51, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Dear TechnoTalk, book reviews are too added in citations. Please have a look at Draft:Sanjib Baruah, and let me know your opinion. Regards -Arunudoy (talk) 23:05, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Arunudoy: You've done a great job finding reviews. I think Baruah meets WP:NAUTHOR now. Pinging Scope creep as the original reviewer, who also saw the need for book reviews as the path to notability. TechnoTalk (talk) 05:03, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Dear TechnoTalk, it would be selfishness of me if I don't admit edit helps by Beccaynr and Djm-leighpark. Beccaynr helped the Draft with more citations. :) -Arunudoy (talk) 05:29, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Arunudoy: These references you put above and in the article aren't sufficient for a BLP. They need to be independent, in-depth and reliable, to count as a WP:SECONDARY source. None of them are in-depth, so don't count. When I reviewed the article I checked the first two blocks of references and there wasn't enough for mainspace. Regarding WP:UPE and WP:COI. They are seperate subjects. If a editor has a COI, the article is checked afterwards to determine if there is content that needs to be removed. If the article is sufficiently notable, it would be kept, even if your blocked. That is Wikipedia policy. scope_creepTalk 10:47, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

12:37:11, 26 January 2022 review of submission by Sophron~trwiki[edit]


I have been trying to get approval for this page and I received a reply from help desk, saying that it is not possible to publish at all and last rejection of my draft is final. However, I want to point out this article: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sandals_Resorts which is very close to my page. I can't see the content different and find it unfair. Please explain me why me article is not worthy compared to Sandals Resort and I am ready to make proper changes.

Thank you.

Selim

Sophron~trwiki (talk) 12:37, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

See other appallingly promotional articles exist. Theroadislong (talk) 20:35, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Sophron~trwiki: Despite also being somewhat advertorial (although not as much as your draft was), Sandals has more coverage, suggesting they are more notable and more deserving of an article. It's also harder for a single hotel to get coverage versus a chain. TechnoTalk (talk) 22:43, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

14:37:31, 26 January 2022 review of submission by Benwoka1978[edit]

I wish to add our club badge to the WOLLASTON VILLAGE FOOTBALL CLUB page, but our logo is not being accepted for upload Benwoka1978 (talk) Benwoka1978 (talk) 14:37, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Benwoka1978 Fair use images are not permitted in drafts. Once accepted, you may then add the logo. Images in general are not necessary to get a draft approved. 331dot (talk) 16:09, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
You say "our club", please read WP:COI and WP:PAID. 331dot (talk) 16:10, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
New users cannot upload images, your account must be four days old. 331dot (talk) 16:11, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

20:14:45, 26 January 2022 review of draft by 192.203.255.20[edit]


Hello, I am currently working to update the Krissy Mashinksy page in hopes to gain approval for the publishing of a live page. I am adding additional reliable outside sources to ensure to address the "notability" issue raised in previous reviews, but wanted to ensure there were no other issues on the page's approval. Please advise if there is, and if there are best practices to ensure we can show Krissy Mashinksy's notability and ensure a quick and easy approval of the page. Thank you!

192.203.255.20 (talk) 20:14, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia has articles, not mere pages. There is no way to guarantee a speedy approval, do you have a specific need for a speedy approval? Who is "we"? If you represent Krissy Mashinsky, please read WP:COI and WP:PAID for information on required formal disclosures.
The draft reads as her resume, and is sourced to press releases and other sources that have little discussion of Krissy. A Wikipedia article must summarize what independent reliable sources with significant coverage have chosen on their own(i.e. not a press release) to say about a person, showing how they meet the special Wikipedia definition of a notable person. Please read Your First Article. 331dot (talk) 20:24, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

20:24:08, 26 January 2022 review of draft by Michiganwolverinette[edit]


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Theban_Tomb_159 I wrote this draft and got the following response:

"Submission declined on 22 January 2022 by Rusalkii (talk).https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Rusalkii Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at TT195 instead."

I doublechecked and they're *not* the same. Rusalkii might have gotten the numbers transposed. What do we do from here?

Thank you!

Michiganwolverinette (talk) 20:24, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Michiganwolverinette thank you for coming here. I will leave a comment on the draft. Please continue to do whatever needs to be done to it, resubmitting when ready. Mistakes do happen. FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 20:28, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/Archives/2022_January_26&oldid=1069202785"