Jump to content

Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2023 January 12

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Help desk
< January 11 << Dec | January | Feb >> January 13 >
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.


January 12[edit]

07:07:12, 12 January 2023 review of submission by Keishaun Morris[edit]


Keishaun Morris (talk) 07:07, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@keishaun morris: Draft:Kay Vibes has been deleted for being an exact copy of copyrighted text. if you wish to continue, start a new, non-copied draft. lettherebedarklight晚安 07:20, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

11:06:20, 12 January 2023 review of submission by AISORESNAVY[edit]


AISORESNAVY (talk) 11:06, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AISORESNAVY You don't ask a question, but your draft was rejected, meaning that it will not be considered further. 331dot (talk) 11:09, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@331dot What are those "cannot be disclosed" errors in the draft? It makes the subject sound like a spy or something... Thanks. David10244 (talk) 12:42, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
No idea. 331dot (talk) 14:33, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

11:32:42, 12 January 2023 review of submission by Ramahare[edit]

hey can you help me to improve this article and tell me what's the problem in this article so I can improve it.

Ramahare (talk) 11:32, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ramahare Sorry, but rejection means that there is nothing that you can do to improve it. No amount of editing can confer notability on a topic. You will need to move on from this. 331dot (talk) 11:43, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

13:53:41, 12 January 2023 review of submission by Pluke[edit]


Hi, Would you be able to give more details on why the submission of Draft:AliceVision was rejected? I believe that @BMaujean addressed the concerns raised previously, see commends on the page and I have edited out the non-notable references. The references left are numerous and notable as far as I can see. No one has yet replied to @BMaujean's points and I think that it now meets Wikipedia:Notability, but would be happy to see the rationale why it isn't. Many thanks Pluke (talk) 13:53, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Pluke I suggest asking the editor who rejected it. S0091 (talk) 16:07, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Article decline[edit]

15:23:15, 12 January 2023 review of draft by Stan.spin[edit]


Hello, i dont understand why our article looks like an advertisement if similar article were approved https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fortinet What kind of references i have to provide? We have a links from our CEO publications, industry sites, mentions in the various industry lists.

Stan.spin (talk) 15:23, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Stan.spin, see WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS, existing articles may not meet today's standards either and I note the article was created way back in 2006. At a brief look, most of the content in the draft is unsourced. Also, what those affiliated with company say or have published is not useful and industry publications are often weak sources. I suggest reading through all the material linked in the declines. S0091 (talk) 16:03, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

15:36:18, 12 January 2023 review of submission by Msti Writer[edit]


Msti Writer (talk) 15:36, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Msti Writer you do not ask question but the draft was rejected meaning it will no longer be considered. S0091 (talk) 16:05, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

15:38:10, 12 January 2023 review of submission by Msti Writer[edit]


Msti Writer (talk) 15:38, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

See above. S0091 (talk) 16:05, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

18:16:54, 12 January 2023 review of submission by KayJuelz4[edit]

Hello, I recently submitted my article on a living person. I attempted to add the in-line citations as requested. However I am unsure if I am suppose to delete the references that I added and allow the references to only show as the footnote? Thank you for your time. KayJuelz4 (talk) 18:16, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @KayJuelz4 (re Draft:Pescy La Ley), yes please remove any duplication and use the footnoted citations. Also, YouTube is at best generally a poor source. See WP:RSPYT for guidance (scroll down to YouTube). S0091 (talk) 18:42, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Ok. thank you very much. KayJuelz4 (talk) 22:33, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
One last question. Do you recommend I remove completely the Youtube references/footnotes from the article? Also If I remove the YouTube reference will I need to remove the statement then about the artist being features in such television shows. thanks. KayJuelz4 (talk) 18:25, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

23:30:59, 12 January 2023 review of draft by 2601:206:8200:4B50:8BF:BD6E:B787:38BB[edit]


2601:206:8200:4B50:8BF:BD6E:B787:38BB (talk) 23:30, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi IP, you do not ask a question but I suggest reading through material linked in the declined message. S0091 (talk) 23:51, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]