Jump to content

Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/feedback/Archive2

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
  • The first bullet after "Please do not submit articles that are about" is (I presume) mistyped and should be "yourself", not "yourelf." saf (talk) 20:31, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
    • Of course, thanks. Fixed. Rd232 talk 20:34, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
  • Can we add "article templates" as described above? ~ PaulT+/C 07:45, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
  • You could have article structure stuff, maybe (and a kitchen sink)? --Joshua Issac (talk) 22:10, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
  • It has weird tabs on the top that don't do anything on the first page, and the END tab is wrapped around under the number 1 tab. And after searching for my topic, it does not fill it in the final name box! Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:14, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
    • Oh, I get your final point now. Sorry, there's currently no way for a search box on one page to know what happened in a search box on another page. Rd232 talk 11:28, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
  • If the pageviews go down as the steps through the wizard do, maybe add a small line of encouragement (you're almost there! or great, first down, a little more to go!) JoeSmack Talk 05:49, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
    • Well it's clear how many steps there, and the progress through them (isn't it?). I fear such messages might be distracting and patronising. And don't forget that unless we expect every person using the wizard to have a well thought out idea for an article on a notable topic with sources to hand, then the objective isn't going to be to turn 100% of users into article creators. It would help if users abandoning told us why, but that's hard to achieve. Rd232 talk 08:28, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
      • Oh, number of steps is quite clear, but it's different from looking up, 'which step am I on now?...gee wiz, i'd rather be checking my tweets...*clickgone*'. The non-well-thought-out people aside, thats what I was envisioning. JoeSmack Talk 15:38, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
        • Well, you could try a more concrete suggestion, or even a sandboxed draft. I'm not really clear on what you have in mind. Rd232 talk 15:57, 19 October 2009 (UTC)

Feedback from 86.170.203.91 (9 December 2009)

Was the Wizard helpful to guide you in creating an article ?

It was very informative and helpful in every way to start an article.

Was it easy to understand ?

It was fairley easy to understand and complete. The language was all spot on and understandable. Apart for how to actuall make the actual article.

Was it complete enough, with enough details ?

I thought it could of asked for more things like name and email so you could contact them.

How can we make it better?

Ask a few more contact details and 'have you ever done something like this before' or 'You must do it on a word document' because I was very confused on where to do it on.

Other comments?

You could have a article on tips for writing articles.

Feedback from EdGilmour (9 January 2010)

Was the Wizard helpful to guide you in creating an article ?
  • Yes
Was it easy to understand ?
  • Yes
Was it complete enough, with enough details ?
  • Yes
How can we make it better?
  • Cannot
Other comments?
  • It was concise, direct, and useful. Very good.

Feedback from Edgarhana (14 January 2010)

Was the Wizard helpful to guide you in creating an article ?

yes

Was it easy to understand ?
  • yes
Was it complete enough, with enough details ?
  • no
How can we make it better?
  • state a sample of articles
Other comments?


Feedback from Robot777 (30 January 2010)

Was the Wizard helpful to guide you in creating an article ?
  • Yes, it was
Was it easy to understand ?
  • It was okay.
Was it complete enough, with enough details ?
  • No,it was not.
How can we make it better?
Other comments?
  • Add more detail!

Feedback from 118.102.184.46 (6 February 2010)

Was the Wizard helpful to guide you in creating an article ?
  • no, the whole wizard got over but there was no critera for writing
Was it easy to understand ?
Was it complete enough, with enough details ?
How can we make it better?


Other comments?

Feedback from Jackthebigspack (25 February 2010)

Was the Wizard helpful to guide you in creating an article ?
  • yes it was
Was it easy to understand ?
  • it was very easy
Was it complete enough, with enough details ?
  • deffinaltly
How can we make it better?
  • sum up some of the meandering points
Other comments?

Page request

Was the Wizard helpful to guide you in creating an article ?
  • No
Was it easy to understand ?
  • No
Was it complete enough, with enough details ?
  • No
How can we make it better?
  • Include important facts on each step of using wizard
Other comments?
  • Add a page with information about www.airpoop.com, i searched for it but was re-directed to an information page with the subject of flatulance

Feedback from Crunkyboy (28 February 2010)

Was the Wizard helpful to guide you in creating an article ?
  • Yes, it was.
Was it easy to understand ?
  • Yes, it was.
Was it complete enough, with enough details ?
  • Yes.
How can we make it better?
  • It's already quite good. It gives you the ggod way to do a neutral and good article.
Other comments?
  • No, its all.

Feedback from Roxanne47 (7 March 2010)

Was the Wizard helpful to guide you in creating an article ?
  • Yes it is helpful
Was it easy to understand ?
  • Yes it is very easy
Was it complete enough, with enough details ?
  • Yes
How can we make it better?
Other comments?

Feedback from Pwned191 (18 March 2010)

Was the Wizard helpful to guide you in creating an article ?

no

Was it easy to understand ?

no

Was it complete enough, with enough details ?

no

How can we make it better?

let me write about myself!

Other comments?

please let me write about myself

Feedback from Gamalcybereader (19 March 2010)

Was the Wizard helpful to guide you in creating an article ?
  • yes
Was it easy to understand ?
  • yes, it's easy to understand
Was it complete enough, with enough details ?
  • not really,
How can we make it better?
  • by adding more tools to help readers better find what they are looking for
Other comments?

I suggest it would be a landmark for your esteemed work, to help us as readers to give you a hand to enrich your fine work. As an example, a new Emam of Al-Azhar Mosque in Cairo, Egypt is assigned today. Unfortunately, your articles mention nothing from near or far, about Sheikh Ahmad ElTayeb, and when I tried to send to you some "seeds" for an article to be composed in a mature or valid structure, I got surprised by the burdensome work it might take, in case it'd be done in one step. I am certain you know better and could do better. For instance, why not collect information about the above mentioned person and review the reliability of the given? The respect and appreciation of your work, motivates me to send to you the under-mentioned facts about the person I am talking about. thank you for your patience and I'm awaiting an answer from your esteemed society, which would be a fine greeting to me.

Leeds Festival Fringe events links

Was the Wizard helpful to guide you in creating an article ?

I think it is, but haven't found out how to link to exisitng content...I am the organizer of the first ever, Leeds Festival Fringe, events in August 2010...how do I link to what is already on wiki please?


http://www.leedsfestivalfringe.org

http://www.phoenixfm.co.uk


Was it easy to understand ?
Was it complete enough, with enough details ?
How can we make it better?
Other comments?

Feedback from Kandi111777 (25 March 2010)

Was the Wizard helpful to guide you in creating an article ?
  • Yes, I've created a few new articles myself but this was great!
Was it easy to understand ?
  • Yes.
Was it complete enough, with enough details ?
  • Yes.
How can we make it better?
Other comments?

Feedback from 61.88.45.5 (26 March 2010)

Was the Wizard helpful to guide you in creating an article ?

Not really. Wikipedia has very little information about the topic at hand, I have at least two websites, the first being http://www.onecmdb.org and the second being the CA website for CA CMDB.

I was going to add a page for OneCMDB, for which the page reference is onecmdb.org, in relation to what an MDR is and how it is used.

Both CA CMDB and OneCMDB use MDR for their CMDB implementation. I can see the MDR page - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Management_Data_Repository - right here.

I've just had to piece together the information useful for this page, and in the past I've started wikipedia pages on topics to which there are needed like this.

I'm not lost and confused.

Every time I use this wizard it leaves me thinking that I shouldn't be putting this information into wikipedia.

This page - http://www.onecmdb.org/wiki/index.php?title=Import_Excel_with_MDR_Configurator - has a start on what you can expect of a generic MDR.

Was it easy to understand ?

I'm still not sure how I'm meant to create a new page on a technical topic to which the audience, at this time, is minimal. I suppose I could link to some white papers on the topics, but I really don't see how that is going to help.

In this case, and MDR is an MDR is an MDR. There is no way of saying that it is anything else; the only question is how each CMDB implementation uses it.

Do you want me to create this page or not?


Was it complete enough, with enough details ?

I don't think it wants me to create a page on something which exists in reality. OneCMDB is just as every bit as valid in existance as CA CMDB software, so why can't I create a OneCMDB page? The only real reference I can give right now is the OneCMDB website. According to your rules, this would be deemed as being Advertising. I think. I'm not sure. I'd rather not break the rules.

How can we make it better?

Allow people to create pages first, then decide afterwards if it is valid or not?

I've spent more time being wound up about not being able to create several new pages ... actually.. given that I have this information right here I've spent more time trying to figure out why the wizard wouldn't let me create pages then actually adding content.

I think the content I'm trying to add must not be worthy.

Please then, delete the pages on: CA (computer associates), CA SCM (Harvest), Endevor, "CMDB", CA CMDB, and related pages.


Other comments?


This is depressing.

Feedback from Lennonbuff (17 March 2010)

Was the Wizard helpful to guide you in creating an article ?
  • No, you need a lawyer to figure it all out. This needs to be simplified to a user friendly format.
Was it easy to understand ?
  • It is not easy to understand!
Was it complete enough, with enough details ?
  • NO!
How can we make it better?
  • The way to make this better is to SIMPLIFY. Make it so that all one has to do is to select a page format, with capsuls to fill in and move around to desired locations on the page. Simple photo/Video upload form section with a browse select button to chose the source and location of desired photo/video. This will make for a more reliable format and submission process.
Other comments?
  • The user does not need to see code or code sections, it is distracting! fix this for us and it will be a more pleasent experience.

Feedback from Gould363 (21 March 2010)

Was this page helpful ?
  • Was expecting more in the way of help with the actual mechanics, & less in the way of 'Are you being a bozo? Click Yes or No' questions. Seems like the Wizard's main function is to prefilter out stuff that violates Wikipedia's standards -- which, believe me, I appreciate the need for (I don't begrudge Wikipedia's tireless admins the help, especially since I'm not pitching in myself as an admin); but it wasn't what I was expecting.
Was it easy to understand ?
  • Yes
Was it complete enough, with enough details ?
How can we make it better ?
  • More links to formatting & style help (like the one for how to add references).
  • Better yet, examples included as a template in the new article itself. Everybody needs to add refs, right? So why make people go find and copy & paste the template from somewhere else?
  • Tips like 'you may find it easier to edit using external software such as Word'.
Other comments ?
  • I found the ASCII user interface prohibitively user unfriendly. Anything that would make it easier would help. What it really needs, of course, is a WYSIWYG front end. While I wouldn't expect that from the Wizard -- it would constitute a next-generation-scale project -- there must be tips & tricks for laying things out in a more human-readable fashion within the constraints of the ASCII system.

Feedback from Lwangaman (1 April 2010)

Was the Wizard helpful to guide you in creating an article ?
Was it easy to understand ?
Was it complete enough, with enough details ?
  • I would suggest including, in the "SUBJECT" tab, the category "FILM" together with "MUSICAL GROUP, ARTIST, ALBUM, or SONG"
How can we make it better?
Other comments?

Lwangaman (talk) 00:43, 1 April 2010 (UTC)

Feedback from 91.177.94.148 (7 April 2010)

Was the Wizard helpful to guide you in creating an article ?

Halfway

Was it easy to understand ?

Yes

Was it complete enough, with enough details ?

No

How can we make it better?

Get the first option (draft) to work: I could not input

Other comments?

As accountant of the Multinational Advisory Police Element and only remaining WEU staffer from this body, referred to (unlinked) in the Foreign Relations of Slovenia page, I have primary responsibility for the history of this organisation. I am also a resigned Wikipedia editor. Can your authorising editor contact me on jelmain arubase skynet dot ISOcodeForBelgium, please?

Feedback from 68.4.76.22 (23 April 2010)

Was the Wizard helpful to guide you in creating an article ? no I wabted to add a note after "12mm gyrojet" in "List of pistol cartridges" since there is no page associated with this heading, but was unable to do so or steer reader to "rocket pistols" and "gyrojet".
Was it easy to understand ?no
Was it complete enough, with enough details ? no
How can we make it better? Simplify process
Other comments? My first try.

Feedback from 88.85.58.246 (27 April 2010)

Was the Wizard helpful to guide you in creating an article ? Yes it is .
Was it easy to understand ? Yes.
Was it complete enough, with enough details ? I think it has the useful things.
How can we make it better? Help the "SIC".
Other comments? I Love Wikipedia.

Feedback from Jnotary (3 May 2010)

Was the Wizard helpful to guide you in creating an article ? Yes
Was it easy to understand ? Yes
Was it complete enough, with enough details ?Yes
How can we make it better? Although writing an article about yourself is not nutral, the other consideration is
No one knows the truth better than yourself.
Other comments?

Feedback from Ranel5310 (21 May 2010)

Was the Wizard helpful to guide you in creating an article ?
  • Almost helpful.
Was it easy to understand ?
  • Somewhat easy...
Was it complete enough, with enough details ?
  • Enough.
How can we make it better?
  • Re-writing the wizard very clearly... I am confused...
Other comments?
  • No more. Thanks.

Feedback from LBMRLS (26 May 2010)

Was the Wizard helpful to guide you in creating an article ?
Was it easy to understand ?
  • No, as I am trying to find out how to upload my article from my Userspace LBMRLS I cannot find the[move] button in my space.
Was it complete enough, with enough details ?
How can we make it better?
  • Make it clear how to uplacod.
Other comments?

Feedback from 76.64.63.21 (9 June 2010)

Was the Wizard helpful to guide you in creating an article ?
  • Yes
Was it easy to understand ?
  • Yes
Was it complete enough, with enough details ?
  • Yes
How can we make it better?
Other comments?

Feedback from Oliver Peyton (10 June 2010)

Was the Wizard helpful to guide you in creating an article ?
  • No
Was it easy to understand ?
  • No. You might as well have written it in ancient Sanskrit
Was it complete enough, with enough details ?
  • It was incomprehensible and wasted an hour of my afternoon
How can we make it better?
  • Simplify, simplify, simplify.
Other comments?
  • I am very unlikely ever to contribute anything to Wikipedia. I am a professional historian, presently working at Oxford University, and I thought that W'pedia was a genuine forum for public knowledge. It is nothing of the kind, however, and I found the whole experience very disappointing.

Feedback from BillAngus (26 June 2010)

Was the Wizard helpful to guide you in creating an article ?

Yes

Was it easy to understand ?

Yes

Was it complete enough, with enough details ?

Yes

How can we make it better?
Other comments?

I see other Wikipedia entries which describe places and organizations (Schools, school boards, etc.). However, these do not meet the definition of "notability" in the wizard (they neither cite authorities nor are they likely to be cited as authorities in other articles). I intended to write an article about a Drug & Alcohol Treatment facility operated by a government organization. The article would be about a notable subject using the dictionary definition of the word (i.e. worthy of note). I surmise that Wikipedia doesn't want such content -- if this is a wrong surmise, you may want to change the description of "notable" in the wizard.

Feedback from EverMoody (27 June 2010)

Was the Wizard helpful to guide you in creating an article ?
  • Yes
Was it easy to understand ?
  • Yes
Was it complete enough, with enough details ?
  • I have only just read the introduction, but the overview of what can be done using the Wizard was concise and clear.
How can we make it better?
Other comments?
  • I appreciate that one of the first things noted in the instructions for creating your first article is that the article can be constructed as a draft on my user page prior to publishing it. I am meticulous and do not like to publish work-in-progress. Thank you for this option.

Feedback from 92.8.11.125 (1 July 2010)

Was the Wizard helpful to guide you in creating an article ?
Was it easy to understand ?
Was it complete enough, with enough details ?
How can we make it better?
Other comments?

boo hiss for wikipedia

Feedback from NeisenKR (7 July 2010)

Was the Wizard helpful to guide you in creating an article ?
  • It was very helpful in understanding what subjects an article should be created on, and how Wiki wants those article sourced. It did not help me understand the intricacies of actually working on / making an article at all.
Was it easy to understand ?
  • The info that was presented was well done.
Was it complete enough, with enough details ?
  • It wasn't a wizard so much as a brief explanation of guidelines. When I hear "wizard" I think of more information plug and play.
How can we make it better?
  • I would like to see / was hoping for a tool to help me build the article itself. It would be best to be able to insert headers, links, notes/ref, etc etc all with a few buttons instead of an average joe (that's me!) trying to follow this computer language.
Other comments?
  • I build cars, not websites. I love Wiki as a reference but I don't think I can actually contribute to it, which is frustrating.

Feedback from Substar (19 July 2010)

Was the Wizard helpful to guide you in creating an article ?
  • Somewhat; though I knew most of what it told me, having been a Wikipedia contributor for a few years.
Was it easy to understand ?
  • Yes
Was it complete enough, with enough details ?
  • Yes
How can we make it better?
  • Please include a description of STUB articles. Is it possible to create a stub using the wizard?
Other comments?
  • The main purpose of the wizard seems to be to discourage people from composing an article when not warranted.

Feedback from 92.113.191.205 (21 July 2010)

Was the Wizard helpful to guide you in creating an article ?

yes

Was it easy to understand ?

yes

Was it complete enough, with enough details ?
  • yes
How can we make it better?
  • everything perfect and clear
Other comments?

its really boon for humans

Feedback from 128.156.10.80 (28 July 2010)

Was the Wizard helpful to guide you in creating an article ?
  • Not really. While it gives the user some idea of what creating an article entails, it doesn't fulfill the normal standards of a wizard; little template is provided, there is no direct link to the usual "Create an Article" interface, etc.
Was it easy to understand ?
Was it complete enough, with enough details ?
How can we make it better?
Other comments?

Feedback from WWriter (30 July 2010)

Was the Wizard helpful to guide you in creating an article ?
  • NO, NO, NO
Was it easy to understand ?
  • yes
Was it complete enough, with enough details ?
  • Please note the page has a selection for "Create an Article Now" and never actually does this. I clicked on "create a new phrase/word" and was taken to the "End" tab that describes neologisms. Huh? It appears to me that the Article Wizard does not describe how to actually create an article (arrrrg). In the discussion pages there is a reference to "New article name is" so there must be a mechanical procedure somewhere, but I cannot find it from the wizard.
How can we make it better?
  • Wikipedia continually makes the same mistake on its instructional pages. There should be two categories, let's say "policies" and "procedures" OR "guiding principles" and "mechanics" OR "preparation" and "doing it". The two categories of instructions should have distinctive and identifying colors or marks so users can immediately see the difference. PLEASE NOTE: Procedures should almost always be written as numbered lists and have verbs for titles. Policy pages can be unordered lists or tabs or standard text and typically have nouns for titles. This convention is well known to technical writers. Why? Because it is what people consciously or subconsciously expect. The "Article wizard" should inform the user at the beginning what he/she can expect to accomplish by following the wizard. Thank you.
Other comments?

Feedback from 2.89.72.10 (11 August 2010)

Was the Wizard helpful to guide you in creating an article ?
  • not enough
Was it easy to understand ?
  • yes
Was it complete enough, with enough details ?
  • yes
How can we make it better?
Other comments?
  • All the people are not understand these detail.

Feedback from Bk314159 (11 August 2010)

On the page which follows "I'm writing about a COMPANY", the word "genericization" should probably be linked to the article on genericized trademark Bk314159 (talk) 19:02, 11 August 2010 (UTC)

done. Thanks for the suggestion. Rd232 talk 19:37, 11 August 2010 (UTC)

Feedback from 85.34.44.162 (16 August 2010)

The archiepiscopal seminary of Milan is the seminary of Archdiocese of Milan.

At present it has three seats: in Venegono Inferiore (Varese province), Seveso (Monza e Brianza province) and in Milan, in corso Venezia. In the latter have their place the ISMI (Istituto sacerdotale Maria Immacolata), that takes care of the continuous training of priests in during the first five years from ordination, and the Istituto Superiore di Scienze Religiose; other various diocesan activities have been holding there. In the other two sites training of seminarists of theology is supervised: in Seveso the I and II theology with the corso propedeutico, in Venegono the subsequent years (from III to VI theology).

History

The first seminary back to the times of St. Charles Borromeo: the site opened in 1564. Under the bishopric of Federico Borromeo took final form the location of the venue corso Venezia, under the name of Seminary of Porta Orientale. Besides its headquarters in Milan, St. Charles built several locations in the large diocese.

From 1638 to 1784 were seven: three in the city of Milan (the Seminary of Porta Orientale, the Seminary of Canonica, the Collegio Elvetico), four minor seminaries in Monza, Arona, Celana and Pollegio.

First reform school and then the presence of Napoleon's troops radically transformed the structure and the previous configuration: for various reasons ceased to be diocesan seminaries Celana, the Collegio Elvetico, the Seminary of Canonica and later Arona; a structure in Castello above Lecco was instead opened. In 1839 was the transfer of that seat at the Dominican convent of St. Peter Martyr in Seveso. With this step the configuration seminary route became so simplified: the ginnasio in Seveso, the liceo in Monza, the theology in Milan.

In the second part of the nineteenth century a seminary for poor students opened in Monza, entrusted to his father Barnabite Luigi Villoresi: training more flexible and open culture of the time (according to the inspirations from Antonio Rosmini) gave birth to a clergy visibly different from that formed with a more traditional way: this led to inevitable tensions. In 1900 a seminary was opened near the Duomo, which took the name Seminarietto, aimed at training those who were intended for liturgical service in the cathedral.

Following the apostolic visitation of the abbot Alfredo Ildefonso Schuster, then Archbishop of Milan, the site of Venegono Inferiore was built with the intention to move there the center of the seminary. The construction began in 1928, started off in 1930 and was solemnly inaugurated in 1935. In the following decades, when the liceo classico and the last three years of theology were placed in Venegono, there were several locations: Seveso (medie-ginnasio), Masnago (elementari-medie), Arcore (medie), Merate (medie), Seminarietto del Duomo (ginnasio-liceo), Saronno (biennium theological and comunità propedeutica), Milano (School for adult vocations).

In 1966 the Cardinal Giovanni Colombo decided to transfer the theological faculty (built by Pope Leo XIII in 1892) from Venegono Inferiore to Milan, thus forming the Facoltà Teologica dell'Italia Settentrionale.

The vocational crisis in the following years forced a reorganization of the community and led to the closure of many facilities. In 1985 the site was closed in Seveso: the ginnasio was transferred to Venegono and after a few years began restructuring. When construction ended in 1998 the community since then living in Saronno was transferred in Seveso. With the gradual extinction of the minor Seminary (closed in 2002 after several attempts for renewal and revitalization), the comunità propedeutica was added to the biennium theological in Seveso.

The restore of the permanent diaconate wanted by Cardinal Carlo Maria Martini in 1986 has found its place in the headquarters of the Seminary.

Seminarists, professors and educators

Popes:

Bishops and Cardinals

Theologians

Sources

  • Il Seminario di Venegono 1935-1985. Pagine d'un cammino, a cura di Cesare Pasini - Mario Spezzibottiani, NED, Milano 1985.
  • Mario Panizza, «Seminario Maggiore», in Dizionario della Chiesa ambrosiana, NED, Milano 1992, vol. V, 3310-3323.
  • La formazione del presbitero diocesano. Linee educative del Seminario di Milano, Centro Ambrosiano, Milano 1995.
  • Dionigi Tettamanzi, San Carlo e il seminario. La formazione dei futuri presbiteri in un mondo che cambia, Centro Ambrosiano, Milano 2006.

External links

Feedback from Frankspikewaloszek (17 August 2010)

Was the Wizard helpful to guide you in creating an article ?
  • Yes
Was it easy to understand ?
  • No, Not one bit
Was it complete enough, with enough details ?
  • Yes
How can we make it better?
  • Make it easier to actually create a page and add links and pictures etc.
Other comments?
  • Make the articalwizzard like a WORD document, then It will be a lot more easier to use.

Granny in paradise

Es la continuación del primer gran juego Super Granny.

Historia Super Granny está de vacaciones en una isla cuando sus mininos son raptados. Ella tiene que encontrarlos a todos y continuar con sus vacaciones. Cuando logra encontrar a todos se da cuenta de que su grupo de tour está en la selva, donde hay más gatos. Más tarde se entera de que sus mininos están viajando a una fábrica. Ahí encuentra a unos monos que la invitan a un paseo en submarino. Pero en él encuentra unos gatos en pecera. Ella se enoja y planea hablar con el supervisor del tour, pero no se encuentra. Después se entera que su grupo vacacional está en el Parque Volcán, y ahí es vigilada por su enemigo el Doctor Meow.

Juego Objetivo El objetivo es enconrar a todos los gatos y llevarlos al Meow Goal, que es una especie de arco azul con las letras MEOW encima. Una vez rescatados todos los gatos, aparecerá la flor de salida, por la que hay que pasar para llegar al siguiente nivel. Peligros

  • Tiki Man: Son los primeros enemigos en aparecer, sólo aparecen en el centro vacacional y en la selva, pero son lentos, por lo que es fácil evadirlos.
  • Perros: Sólo caminan en una línea, , así que no te harán daño si no estás cerca. Aparecen en cualquier paisaje.
  • Robot gato: Es un robot con un gato dentro de él. Aparecen en lugar de los Tiki Man, en los paisajes de la fábrica, submarino y volcán.
  • Gorila: Aparecen en la fábrica, submarino y volcán. Son los enemigos más rápidos de todos y pueden trepar en las barras de monos, adiferencia de los demás.
  • Lodo/Lava: No son movibles ni tienen vida, sólo están ahí en el suelo, para que aluien se unada en él.

Objetos

  • Regadera: Sirve para regar enrredaderas o Tomatos acecinos.
  • Paraguas:Sicaes con el paraguas comenzaás a flotar levemente hasta llegar al suelo. Si hay un ventilador abajo, sólo se elevará.
  • Llave: Es útil para abrir una puerta y entrar a un área cerrada.
  • Bomba: Hace explotar roca o enemigos siempre y cuando estén junto a ella. No se puede cavar si se tiene la bomba, ya que para usarla se presiona la barra espaciadora.
  • Monedero: Si se tiene el monedero y se oprime la barra espaciadora dará vueltas paragolpear a los enemigos. No se puede cavar con el monedero.
  • Perforadora: Si se oprime la barra espaciadora con ella se podrá cavar en la roca.

Cosas útiles

  • Teletransportador: Te llevará a otro lugar inmediatamente con sóloentrar en él. LOs enemigos no pueden teletransportarse.
  • Plataformas: Se mueven vertical u horizontalmente para trasladar. Lo enemigos no pueden subir a ellas pero los gatos sí.
  • Enrredaderas: Al raegarse crecen y puedes subir como si fuera escalera.
  • Tomatos acecinos: Cuando un enemigo #menos perros# pasen junto a él de inmediado serán comidos.
  • Barras de monos: Sirven para trepar por ellas. Sólo pues tú y los gorilas.

Tipos de piso

  • Tierra: En ella es posible cavar.
  • Roca: Sólo desaparece on bombs o perforadóras.
  • Tierra con agua: Es posible cavar en ella, pero te hace lento#a#.
  • Hielo: Es resbaloso y no se puede cavar en él. No desaparece con nada.
  • Piso desmoronándose: Al pararse en él dura sólo dos segundos y se cae.
  • Metal No desaparece, no se puede cavar en él.
  • Tierra con hoyo: Al pisarlo aparece un hoyo y te caes. No se puede cavar en el.
  • Roca con hoyo: Al igual que el anterior tiene un hoyo, pero no puede desaparecer.

Flores Hay floras que, al encontrar cien, te dan una vida. Alencontrar todas en un novel aparece una flecha roja, que al pasar poa ahí, te dan otras veinte flores. Niveles de bonificación Son los niveles que no tienen gatos, flores ni enemigos, sino corazones que valen diez puntos cada uno. Opciones Se encuentra en el menú de inicio e incluye el volúmen de voz, sonidos y música. Incluye tambien la opción de pantalla completa o ventana. Puntajes altos Cotiene los cien puntajes más altos de la caegoría "hoy", "de la semana", "del mes", o "en geneal" Editor de niveles Permite crear niveles nuevos que pueden ser jugados en "aventuras adicionales" Ayuda Te llva a la página de internet con sus instrcciones. Quitar Puedes salir así del juego. Niveles Contiene 172 niveles para jugar, al final te dicen tu avance. Son 40 niveles en el centro vacacional, 34 en la selva, 33 en la fábrica, 33 en el submaino y finalmente 32 en el volcán.

Feedback from Clarkscottroger (24 August 2010)

Was the Wizard helpful to guide you in creating an article ?
  • definitely. i haven't actually created one yet. but the Wizard is an extremely useful tool to get me started.
Was it easy to understand ?
  • yes
Was it complete enough, with enough details ?
  • yes
How can we make it better?
Other comments?
  • there are so many options of ways to use wikipedia which i was not aware of. i didn't realize that i could actually create something on wikipedia. i've just used it for what it is - finding out information. this is exciting!Clarkscottroger (talk) 01:48, 24 August 2010 (UTC)

Feedback from 143.232.210.38 (24 August 2010)

Was the Wizard helpful to guide you in creating an article ?
  • Verbose.
Was it easy to understand ?
  • Depends on word specificity and definition.
Was it complete enough, with enough details ?
  • Maybe not.
How can we make it better?
  • Better support is needed for stub articles.
Other comments?
  • Yes, I read What Wikipedia is Not. The problem is big existing gaps in wikipedia coverage in topical areas.

Feedback from James Peru (28 August 2010)

Was the Wizard helpful to guide you in creating an article ?
Was it easy to understand ?
Was it complete enough, with enough details ?
  • yes
How can we make it better?
Other comments?

Feedback from Morels (28 August 2010)

Was the Wizard helpful to guide you in creating an article ?
Was it easy to understand ?
Was it complete enough, with enough details ?
How can we make it better?
Other comments?
  • The buttons to create a draft caused a PHP file to be downloaded. My browser is Firefox 3.6.8 and my computer is an iMac running Mac OS 10.5.8. I've noticed this behaviour by Wikipedia before, a few years ago. To the best of my recollection there was no response to this issue.

Feedback from 80.184.115.150 (31 August 2010)

Was the Wizard helpful to guide you in creating an article ?
Was it easy to understand ?
Was it complete enough, with enough details ?
How can we make it better?
Other comments?

Feedback from 68.34.135.9 (2 September 2010)

Was the Wizard helpful to guide you in creating an article ? yes
Was it easy to understand ? yes
Was it complete enough, with enough details ? yes
How can we make it better? I think it is great
Other comments? Thank you a lot for this kind of service that provide high standards of Information and knowledge.

Feedback from Mapmission (2 September 2010)

Was the Wizard helpful to guide you in creating an article ? yes it is good
Was it easy to understand ? in a way yes
Was it complete enough, with enough details ? yes a lot
How can we make it better? with practical tools
Other comments? Thanks a lot

Feedback from Samahadik (3 September 2010)

Was the Wizard helpful to guide you in creating an article ?
Was it easy to understand ?
Was it complete enough, with enough details ?
How can we make it better?
Other comments?

Feedback from 41.129.11.14 (22 September 2010)

Was the Wizard helpful to guide you in creating an article ?
Was it easy to understand ?
Was it complete enough, with enough details ?
How can we make it better?
Other comments?

Feedback from 41.129.11.14 (22 September 2010)

Was the Wizard helpful to guide you in creating an article ?
yes
Was it easy to understand ?
yes
Was it complete enough, with enough details ?

yes

How can we make it better?

by my mine

Other comments?
no

Feedback from Badamilife (23 September 2010)

Was the Wizard helpful to guide you in creating an article ? Yes
Was it easy to understand ? Yes
Was it complete enough, with enough details ? Yes
How can we make it better? I think the policy I was ready to question is more than fair.
Other comments? Good job Wik... I love using your site!

Feedback from Putzelt (28 September 2010)

Was the Wizard helpful to guide you in creating an article ? yes
Was it easy to understand ? yes
Was it complete enough, with enough details ? yes
How can we make it better? you cant its amazing
Other comments?

Feedback from Hordaland (7 October 2010)

Was the Wizard helpful to guide you in creating an article ?
Was it easy to understand ?
Was it complete enough, with enough details ?
How can we make it better?
  • Include the information that the text should not address itself to "you". --Hordaland (talk) 03:49, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
Other comments?

Feedback from Sam mccrone (7 October 2010)

Was the Wizard helpful to guide you in creating an article ?
  • in some ways yes
Was it easy to understand ?
  • fairly
Was it complete enough, with enough details ?
  • no it needs to get to the point!
How can we make it better?
  • simplfy it, all i want to do is open a subject port hole for my subject not search wiki
Other comments?
  • I quantify everything and still you are great!

Feedback from Donkeywillies (8 October 2010)

Was the Wizard helpful to guide you in creating an article ?
  • not in the slightest! i was and still am really confused about how to make a goddamn article and i am still no nearer to finding out how to do it. you should make a page specifically desgined as a tutorial for new users without all the confusing links and jargon.
Was it easy to understand ?
  • was what easy to understand?
Was it complete enough, with enough details ?

i never actually got that far did i

How can we make it better?
  • see top box
Other comments?
  • your h

Feedback from Jtbears (11 October 2010)

Was the Wizard helpful to guide you in creating an article ?
  • Yes.
Was it easy to understand ?
  • A little.
Was it complete enough, with enough details ?
  • No.
How can we make it better?
Other comments?

Feedback from Fab.mariotti (13 October 2010)

Was the Wizard helpful to guide you in creating an article ?
  • Not at all! But I wanted to write an article about myself. But the very ad part was: what do you want to write? me: about myself. next page was: ciccia! you cannot. So just do not give this possibility!
Was it easy to understand ?
  • For that far I could get yes. But this was one click.
Was it complete enough, with enough details ?
  • Not at all. You stopped me after the second click. You didn't tell me that I could not proceed.
How can we make it better?
  • Remove the: personal page. Or keep it in place as a dead link but give information. Not that much as a wizard.
 So just do not propose what you cannot do in the wizard.
Other comments?
  • Getting a personal page is a nightmare. But I know about other personal pages.
 Why do you do it so complicated? I just overlooked the directives page.
 You have no way to check the data anyway. But I just indeed logged in.
 Would it be working indeed to ask a friend to do the page?
 Is this so odd? Can I write a page about luther Blisset?

  This is my next task.

Bis F

Feedback from ESMcL (26 October 2010)

Was the Wizard helpful to guide you in creating an article ?
  • Yes, very well laid out and with multible levels providing more info.
Was it easy to understand ?
  • Yes, added help was always nearby.
Was it complete enough, with enough details ?
  • I never reached the bottom or ran out of answers.
How can we make it better?
  • I do not have a good answer yet, I will need more time working with it before I could offer to improve on it.
Other comments?
  • Nice work, good job.

Feedback from 115.147.192.39 (29 October 2010)

Was the Wizard helpful to guide you in creating an article ?
  • I want to make my article
Was it easy to understand ?
Was it complete enough, with enough details ?
How can we make it better?
Other comments?

Feedback from Eveningglory (29 October 2010)

Was the Wizard helpful to guide you in creating an article ?
Was it easy to understand ?
Was it complete enough, with enough details ?
How can we make it better?
Other comments?

Hello please guide how to create a Wiki STUB? thanks & Regards

Feedback from Rezashirmarz (5 November 2010)

Was the Wizard helpful to guide you in creating an article ?
  • yes.
Was it easy to understand ?
  • yes.
Was it complete enough, with enough details ?
  • yes.
How can we make it better?
  • It is OK.
Other comments?

Feedback from 117.199.114.54 (6 November 2010)

Madan Rathore

Feedback from 117.199.114.54 (6 November 2010)

Was the Wizard helpful to guide you in creating an article ?
  • yes
Was it easy to understand ?
  • yes
Was it complete enough, with enough details ?
  • yes
How can we make it better?
  • It is OK
Other comments?

Feedback from 117.199.114.54 (6 November 2010)

Was the Wizard helpful to guide you in creating an article ?
  • yes
Was it easy to understand ?
  • yes
Was it complete enough, with enough details ?
  • yes
How can we make it better?
  • It is OK
Other comments?

Feedback from 221.134.119.164 (16 November 2010)

Was the Wizard helpful to guide you in creating an article ?
  • yes this is helpful
Was it easy to understand ?
  • yes,it is easy to understand
Was it complete enough, with enough details ?
  • complete enough
How can we make it better?
  • you cheak an article clearly
Other comments?
  • no nothing u r good but one time simply deleted some data

Chessy

Was the Wizard helpful to guide you in creating an article ?
Was it easy to understand ?
Was it complete enough, with enough details ?
How can we make it better?
Other comments?

Feedback from Ibraahim wadani (22 November 2010)

Was the Wizard helpful to guide you in creating an article ?
  • very well
Was it easy to understand ?
  • yes,well done
Was it complete enough, with enough details ?
  • yeah
How can we make it better?
  • we can make it better by correcting our mistakes
Other comments?
  • thank you for your help and guiding

Feedback from 121.73.172.92 (8 December 2010)

Was the Wizard helpful to guide you in creating an article ?
  • Yes
Was it easy to understand ?
  • Yes
Was it complete enough, with enough details ?
  • Yes
How can we make it better?
Other comments?
  • How does one do about entering some basic bio details to enhance my name reference? I just want to 'flesh out' the person behind the name.

Thanks

Feedback from 180.193.157.188 (16 December 2010)

Was the Wizard helpful to guide you in creating an article ?
  • quite helpful. not at all
Was it easy to understand ?
  • yes
Was it complete enough, with enough details ?
  • no
How can we make it better?
  • by editing it
Other comments?

Feedback from Roshandada (17 December 2010)

Was the Wizard helpful to guide you in creating an article ?
Was it easy to understand ?
Was it complete enough, with enough details ?
How can we make it better?
Other comments?

Feedback from 82.44.85.93 (28 December 2010)

Was the Wizard helpful to guide you in creating an article ?
  • Fuck you,no
Was it easy to understand ?
  • Shit
Was it complete enough, with enough details ?
  • Bitch
How can we make it better?
Other comments?
  • You are a fucked off crazy "son of a bitch"

Feedback from 69.47.191.70 (31 December 2010)

Was the Wizard helpful to guide you in creating an article ?

?

Was it easy to understand ?

?

Was it complete enough, with enough details ?

?

How can we make it better?

?

Other comments?

No

Abishek.P.Das

Abishek.P.Das was born in Thiruvalla, India. His father's name is Peethambara Das K. His mother's name is Sainaja.P.Das. He is also known as Sreekuttan. He is Studying in DB Pampa College, Parumala. He is a web designer. Abishek is a die hard fan of Allu Arjun. He created a blog. That blog deals with Bunny. Bunny Fan Blog

Feedback from Musketeer41 Musketeer41 (5 January 2011)

Was the Wizard helpful to guide you in creating an article ?
  • Not mine
Was it easy to understand ?
  • yes
Was it complete enough, with enough details ?
  • yes
How can we make it better?
  • Show step by step on creating a page. Title, introduction, points, picture(s), links, ending.
Other comments?
  • I thought we could make anything as long as it was appropriate and mature.

User:Musketeer41

Feedback from Jrichdapitpat (9 January 2011)

Was the Wizard helpful to guide you in creating an article ? yes
Was it easy to understand ? yes
Was it complete enough, with enough details ? yes
How can we make it better? its very understandable enough as it is
Other comments? none

Feedback from Anas1712 (12 January 2011)

Was the Wizard helpful to guide you in creating an article ?
  • Yes
Was it easy to understand ?
  • Yes
Was it complete enough, with enough details ?
  • Yes
How can we make it better?
  • No problem
Other comments?
  • No

Feedback from no-such-ip (18 January 2021)

YOUR ARTICLE WIZARD DOES NOT ALLOW YOU TO CREATE ARTICLES!

Zürich (Höngg), Switzerland

Höngg is a quarter in the district 10 in Zurich.

It was formerly a municipality of its own, having been incorporated into Zurich in 1934.

The quarter has a population of 21,186 distributed on an area of 6.98 km².

Jimmy Buffett's former coral reefer band members are Mary Harris and Nikki Yarling

Was the Wizard helpful to guide you in creating an article ? no
Was it easy to understand ?no
Was it complete enough, with enough details ? no
How can we make it better? I am trying to add 2 names (Mary Harris and Nikki Yarling) to Jimmy Buffett's former coral reefer band and it is not letting me.
Other comments? Please let me know how to do that.

Michael Ezemonye

Michael Ezemonye hails from Ideato South Local Government Area in Imo State, Nigeria. Presently, He is teaching at Immaculate Heart Nursery & Primary School Ojoto Aba Abia State.

Feedback from Ambiblio (10 February 2011)

Was the Wizard helpful to guide you in creating an article ?

Absolutely not!

Was it easy to understand ?

NO!

Was it complete enough, with enough details ?

NO!

How can we make it better?

Better info on how to post an article from user page on to Article Wizard. Why isn't there a link already there? If there is, where the heck is it?

Other comments?

I have spent hours, researching (with footnotes, references and plenty of citation my article on Carleton Bruns Joeckel for my Library and Info Science class and it is already deleted. What happened???? Did you see the recent NY Times article where only 15% of your users are women. Wonder why???

Feedback from 98.244.220.93 (11 February 2011)

Was the Wizard helpful to guide you in creating an article ?

YES.NOT GET TO A PLACE THAT PEOPLE LISTEN,THAK YOU JOEP

Was it easy to understand ?
Was it complete enough, with enough details ?
How can we make it better?
  • didnot get to create an article

it would be how to pay the national debt the united stats has. and why not the united states citizen buy it back from China .we like the intrest they are getting.

Other comments?
  • NODEBT AT ALL!

a 5% cut in every government expencew, encluding the president of the united states,and all of our representives. a

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/feedback/Archive2&oldid=462157185"