Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/feedback/Archive 17
Feedback from Yuvanthamil (9 January 2019)[edit]
- Did you find the instructions clear?
- Yes i did
- How quickly was your submission reviewed?
- It took about 3 weeks
- Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?
- — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yuvanthamil (talk • contribs) 17:28, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
Feedback from Cotidianus (15 January 2019)[edit]
- Did you find the instructions clear?
No*
- How quickly was your submission reviewed?
- it took months
- Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?
- I do but I have no doubt, based on my experience, that this would be a waste of my time. What I actually wrote (the page is now called "Stotfold (house)") was correct and factual and without any expression of opinion or conjecture. It has been decimated by one of Wikipedia's editors who doubtless thinks he is acting out of the best of motives, and who has added a portentous warning that:
"A major contributor to this article appears to have a close connection with its subject. It may require cleanup to comply with Wikipedia's content policies, particularly neutral point of view"
which, when one reads what is left of the article, consisting of a few randomly-selected statements which tell the reader very little about the subject matter, is nonsense.
The suggestion that the remaining text might not be neutral is laughable - albeit the laughter is of the hollow nature.
I would like to thank and commend an editor whose pseudonym is "Dragonfly 6-7" for his good humour and help, and I hope his influence within Wikipedia grows. Please would you pass this on to him?
Regards Mark Daley' ("Cotidianus") — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cotidianus (talk • contribs) 10:07, 15 January 2019 (UTC)
Feedback from Talib23 (16 January 2019)[edit]
- Did you find the instructions clear?
- How quickly was your submission reviewed?
- Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?
Feedback from Htewarso (27 January 2019)[edit]
- Did you find the instructions clear?
- not really; I cannot remove the disclaimers or criticisms, even though I made changes.
There are sufficient references and links; the "ibid" has been removed and replaced with an abbreviated quotation.
- How quickly was your submission reviewed?
- I have not had an answer since last October, even though I have asked for help every so often.
- Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?
- It would be nice to have one guide/mentor with whom I can communicate. Htewarso (talk) 03:15, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Feedback from Htewarso (30 January 2019)[edit]
--Htewarso (talk) 22:30, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
- Did you find the instructions clear?
- I did not receive any instructions.
- How quickly was your submission reviewed?
- I have taken care of all the objections (citations, links, etc.)
- Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?
- Yes, it would be helpful to get an answer from a mentor
Htewarso (talk) 22:30, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Feedback from Orbksb (3 February 2019)[edit]
- Did you find the instructions clear?
- Yes I do, although I have to reread several times to be sure I correctly do all the requirements for my article.
- How quickly was your submission reviewed?
- It was a bit long, but still less than expected, since I read that the review process would take several weeks.
- Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?
- All reviewers are volunteers and made a really good work. It would be difficult to improve this process but, maybe we could implement in Wikipedia a program that give more news about the review process of the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Orbksb (talk • contribs) 00:40, 3 February 2019 (UTC)
Feedback from A 10 fireplane (4 February 2019)[edit]
- Did you find the instructions clear?
- Yes very
- How quickly was your submission reviewed?
- About 1 day
- Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?
- Nope, all is well A 10 fireplane Imform me 16:15, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
Feedback from Tapir-sc (15 February 2019)[edit]
- Did you find the instructions clear?
- How quickly was your submission reviewed?
Within a few days, much faster than I had expected. Thanks!
- Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?
Feedback from Mxra (2 March 2019)[edit]
- Did you find the instructions clear?
- Yes
- How quickly was your submission reviewed?
- Quite quickly (it took about 15 hours or so if I'm not wrong)
- Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?
- No, you have done a very good job so thank you. 10/10. In return I'll try my best to improve wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mxra (talk • contribs) 19:24, 2 March 2019 (UTC)
Feedback from Gregorywall (3 March 2019)[edit]
- Did you find the instructions clear?
- How quickly was your submission reviewed?
- Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?
I have rewrote most of the article on Lawrence Marvin Langer so I would like to have the plagerism notice at the top of the article removed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gregorywall (talk • contribs) 21:32, 3 March 2019 (UTC)
Feedback from Jordanismaname (12 March 2019)[edit]
- Did you find the instructions clear?
No
- How quickly was your submission reviewed?
Yes
- Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?
Clearer instructions and reviews — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jordanismaname (talk • contribs) 06:04, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
Feedback from Chris Warburton Brown (16 May 2019)[edit]
- Did you find the instructions clear?
Yes, apart from not being clear about how to submit a draft artice for rview. I couldn't find this anywhere.
- How quickly was your submission reviewed?
Within 30 minutes; incredible! Many thanks!
- Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?
Having my article graded as 'start' level wasn't very helpul; I need more detailed feedback if I'm going to improve it. As I have a PhD and make a living from writing, I assume (perhaps arrogantly) that there isn't much wrong with the grammar, style, lay out etc., but how do I know? And as the page I created lists all the known works of the subject, and all their key biographical details, I'm not sure what more I can add; again some feedback would have been helpful here. I appreciate that reviewers' time is limited, but I'm left with no idea how to get this, or any future articles, up to the next level.
Feedback from MissOOQQ (1 June 2019)[edit]
- Did you find the instructions clear?
yes
- How quickly was your submission reviewed?
3 days
- Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?
nope
if I continue working on my article, can I receive the new level?(e.g. C-B?) — Preceding unsigned comment added by MissOOQQ (talk • contribs) 00:15, 1 June 2019 (UTC)
Feedback from Le Passant (3 June 2019)[edit]
- Did you find the instructions clear?
- Yes
- How quickly was your submission reviewed?
- More than 2 years between first draft and accepted version
- Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?
- I thought my proposal would be deleted soon et I am quite surprised with its acception !--Le Passant (talk) 13:28, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
Feedback from Coffee312 (5 September 2019)[edit]
- Did you find the instructions clear?
- Yes
- How quickly was your submission reviewed?
- More than three months
- Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?
Feedback from Juanlapuente (18 December 2019)[edit]
- Did you find the instructions clear?
- Yes
- How quickly was your submission reviewed?
- It took around a year
- Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?
- I understand that you have your criteria for independence, however, in my opinion, scientific original articles are always more objective and independent than journalistic articles — Preceding unsigned comment added by Juanlapuente (talk • contribs) 10:28, 18 December 2019 (UTC)