Wikipedia:WikiProject Aviation/Assessment/Connecticut Wing Civil Air Patrol

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

Connecticut Wing Civil Air Patrol[edit]

Self-nominator: I believe this article exemplifies the great work of WP. Although it did not pass FAC, it did fairly well (see the archive). I believe that there are no gaping holes, only minor adjustments, to bring this article to FA status. Codharris (talk) 00:01, 4 April 2008 (UTC) Update: In addition, I have gone through and fixed everything from the previous ACR. 75.40.94.244 (talk) 20:37, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  • Currently the article meets GA-Class criteria, which exceeds A-Class criteria in the order. I don't think this article needs to be reviewed for A-Class. If it is ever delisted from GA-Class, A-Class would certainly be warranted in the article's current state. --Born2flie (talk) 15:48, 13 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    • My apologies, I had misunderstood A-Class to be a lower quality than GA-Class in WP:Aviation's scheme. I will ask to add some comments that were made in another discussion and then review further, later. --Born2flie (talk) 15:42, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment - The second paragraph seems a little contrived, as if it is composed for a school essay on, Why is the Connecticut Wing Civil Air Patrol notable? I would recommend revising it by just jumping into an overview of the history, rather than trying to prove its notability. The notability is proven or not by the content of the article, without needing to state it as notable. I'll vote later, but right now, I'm leaning to a weak oppose. --Born2flie (talk) 11:52, 28 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Trevor MacInnis[edit]

Support - Looks great. - Trevor MacInnis (Contribs) 18:46, 8 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.