Wikipedia:WikiProject Biography/Peer review/John Rosenberger

John Rosenberger[edit]

I wrote a lengthy biography primarily using information from the only major source available for the artist's life and works, an article in Alter Ego #23 (the writing for the Wikipedia article is all original). While I feel this article is a well-written, well-cited, well-supported Good Article, I understand that the subject is only of low to medium importance. Please advise on protocol – should the article be cut down? Is it frowned upon to include "unimportant" life details? Any input is welcome. Thanks, Slugabed (talk) 22:18, 21 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Review by llywrch

After reading the article in its current version, I don't see anything I'd cut out. It covers his early life, career, & explains his notability. If Wikipedia were paper, some of this would likely be trimmed out -- but this is not the case. -- llywrch (talk) 17:15, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]