Wikipedia:WikiProject Biography/Peer review/Joseph W. Tkach

Joseph W. Tkach[edit]

I am requesting another Biography project peer review of this article and an assessment on whether this is an A-class article. It currently has GA status and has gone through a general peer review. Many improvements have been made since it reached GA. I have placed the old Biography project peer review comments in the archive below. I am not sure if this is the best way to archive old peer reviews. RelHistBuff 17:56, 1 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Archive1

Yannismarou[edit]

I think the article is A-Class and can go even higher. It was already a very nice article when I first reviewed it and it is even better now. I don't have much to propose here. Some minor, mainly technical, remarks:

You could wikilink some more technical terms, such as deacon.
One time you say Herbert W. Armstrong, then Armstrong, then again Herbert W. Armstrong! You say once Herbert W. Armstrong and then is always Armstrong.
Check double wikilinks. I think you wikilink tithing twice (minor issue of course, but I don't see any major issues in the article!).
"The impact of Tkach’s tenure as the head of the WCG was tremendous." Personally, I don't like this phrasing so much. I would prefer a more mild wording.--Yannismarou 08:21, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks for your comments. I implemented your suggestions. I agree that "tremendous" is a bit strong so I changed it to "notable". I intend to submit this for FA status so any other suggestions to help attain that goal are welcome. --RelHistBuff 11:04, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]