Wikipedia:WikiProject Brazil/Assessment
 |
| Main pages |
|---|
| Brazil Task Forces |
Articles that are part of WikiProject Brazil are assessed on a combination of factors by placing the {{WikiProject Brazil}} template on an article’s talk page, along with tags for: class, importance, task force, and optional editor flags.
Progress bars[edit]
The proportion of all articles with an assessed project banner is:
98.2% assessed (estimate: some more article talk pages may still need a banner)
The proportion of all articles with known importance is:
92.3% known importance (estimate: some more articles may still need a banner)
Assessment Log[edit]
The Wikipedia Version 1.0 Editorial Team generates an assessment log of all articles that have been recently renamed, reassessed, assessed or removed.
Class[edit]
An article's quality assessment is generated from the class parameter in the {{WikiProject Brazil}} project banner on its talk page:
The following values may be used for the class parameter to describe the quality of the article (see Wikipedia:Content assessment for assessment criteria):
| FA (for featured articles only; adds articles to Category:FA-Class Brazil articles) |  FA |
|
| A (adds articles to Category:A-Class Brazil articles) |  A |
|
| GA (for good articles only; adds articles to Category:GA-Class Brazil articles) |  GA |
|
| B (adds articles to Category:B-Class Brazil articles) | B | |
| C (adds articles to Category:C-Class Brazil articles) | C | |
| Start (adds articles to Category:Start-Class Brazil articles) | Start | |
| Stub (adds articles to Category:Stub-Class Brazil articles) | Stub | |
| FL (for featured lists only; adds articles to Category:FL-Class Brazil articles) | FL |
|
| List (adds articles to Category:List-Class Brazil articles) | List |
For non-standard grades and non-mainspace content, the following values may be used for the class parameter:
Importance[edit]
An article's importance assessment is generated from the importance parameter in the {{WikiProject Brazil}} project banner on its talk page:
The following values may be used for the importance parameter to describe the relative importance of the article within the project (see Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Priority of topic for assessment criteria):
| Top (adds articles to Category:Top-importance Brazil articles) | Top | |
| High (adds articles to Category:High-importance Brazil articles) | High | |
| Mid (adds articles to Category:Mid-importance Brazil articles) | Mid | |
| Low (adds articles to Category:Low-importance Brazil articles) | Low | |
| NA (adds articles to Category:NA-importance Brazil articles) | NA | |
| ??? (articles for which a valid importance rating has not yet been provided are listed in Category:Unknown-importance Brazil articles) | ??? |
Importance Scale[edit]
The criteria used for rating article importance are not meant to be an absolute or canonical view of how significant the topic is. Rather, they attempt to gauge the probability of the average reader of Wikipedia needing to look up the topic (and thus the immediate need to have a suitably well-written article on it). Thus, subjects with greater popular notability may be rated higher than topics which are arguably more "important" but which are of interest primarily to students of Brazil.
Note that general notability need not be from the perspective of editor demographics; generally notable topics should be rated similarly regardless of the country or region in which they hold said notability. Thus, topics which may seem obscure to a Western audience—but which are of high notability in other places—should still be highly rated.
| Importance | Criteria | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Top | Subject is extremely important, even crucial, to its specific field. Reserved for subjects that have achieved international notability within their field. | Economic history of Brazil |
| High | Subject is extremely notable, but has not achieved international notability, or is only notable within a particular continent. | Banco do Brasil |
| Mid | Subject is only notable within its particular field or subject and has achieved notability in a particular place or area. | National Library of Brazil |
| Low | Subject is not particularly notable or significant even within its field of study. It may only be included to cover a specific part of a notable article. | Betim |
| NA | Subject importance is not applicable. Generally applies to non-article pages such as redirects, categories, templates, etc. | Category:Brazil |
| ??? | Subject importance has not yet been assessed. | ??? |
Task Force Assessment[edit]
There are seven WikiProject Brazil task forces. Not every article will be suited for inclusion in a task force. Some articles may logically be included in more than one. The task forces are:
- Arts in Brazil Task Force (5,500 total articles; add
arts=yesto the template) - Education and Science in Brazil Task Force (1,007;
edu=yes) - Geography of Brazil Task Force (6,211;
geo=yes) - Government and Laws of Brazil Task Force (1,876;
gov=yes) - History of Brazil Task Force (1,638;
history=yes) - Sports in Brazil Task Force (8,685;
sports=yes) - Transportation in Brazil Task Force (1,134;
transport=yes)
Related Projects[edit]
Some Brazilian topics may also be covered by other WikiProjects.
- Football in Brazil Task Force (14,430)
- tagged for both WikiProject Brazil (Sports task force) and WikiProject Football (Brazil task force)
Templates to remove and replace with {{WikiProject Brazil}}:
- WikiProject South America is an inactive project and the template {{WikiProject South America}} should not be used for articles that are related only to Brazil and to no other South American countries.
- WikiProject Latin America is similar to WP South America. As above, the {{WikiProject South America}} template may be removed when found on Brazil-only articles.
Project Statistics[edit]
| Brazil articles by quality and importance | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Quality | Importance | ||||||
| Top | High | Mid | Low | NA | ??? | Total | |
| FA
|
7 | 4 | 7 | 18 | 36 | ||
| FL
|
2 | 2 | |||||
| FM
|
49 | 49 | |||||
| GA
|
3 | 7 | 15 | 51 | 76 | ||
| B | 35 | 73 | 111 | 215 | 164 | 598 | |
| C | 76 | 105 | 387 | 1,214 | 301 | 2,083 | |
| Start | 58 | 268 | 909 | 9,867 | 1 | 1,119 | 12,222 |
| Stub | 45 | 494 | 21,781 | 6 | 1,811 | 24,137 | |
| List | 1 | 20 | 97 | 1,081 | 4 | 70 | 1,273 |
| Category | 6 | 13,431 | 13,437 | ||||
| Disambig | 1 | 3 | 67 | 71 | |||
| File | 98 | 98 | |||||
| Portal | 3 | 3 | |||||
| Project | 58 | 58 | |||||
| Redirect | 1 | 9 | 21 | 324 | 580 | 935 | |
| Template | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1,497 | 1,500 | ||
| Other | 2 | 74 | 76 | ||||
| Assessed | 181 | 532 | 2,043 | 34,565 | 15,868 | 3,465 | 56,654 |
| Unassessed | 3 | 70 | 979 | 1,052 | |||
| Total | 181 | 532 | 2,046 | 34,635 | 15,868 | 4,444 | 57,706 |
| WikiWork factors (?) | ω = 216,215 | Ω = 5.52 | |||||
Each of the task forces listed above has its own version of the table above on its page.