Jump to content

Wikipedia:WikiProject Cape Cod and the Islands

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
WikiProject Cape Cod and the Islands
Sandy Neck Dunes
ShortcutWP:CC&I
Parent
project(s)		Massachusetts
Has goals?Yes

Welcome to the WikiProject Cape Cod & The Islands! Do you love the peninsula of Cape Cod, or are you an admirer of the Islands to the south? Do you want to assist us in cleaning up pages associated with the Cape and Islands? Then this is the Project for you. We are open to ways to expand this Project so hop on board and add suggestions. Even if you're not a heavy editor, you are still appreciated. Please add yourself to the Members section.

Recent news

[edit]

Article alerts

[edit]

Articles to be merged

Articles to be split

Criteria

[edit]

For an article to be part of this project, it must meet one of the following requirements:

  • It is/was located on the Cape and Islands
    • Ships must have sunk off the Cape and Islands within 175 miles of the shore
    • Ships can have been stationed near the Cape for a month or more (lightships)
  • It is/was important to the history of the Cape
  • The person must have lived on the Cape for over a year, been raised here, or vacationed more than a few times here.
    • The exception is if they did something here that advanced their career greatly (George H.W. Bush earned his wings in Hyannis)

Members

[edit]

Active members

[edit]

To join WikiProject Cape Cod and the Islands, edit this section and add #{{subst:me}} and any comments to the end of the following list of members.

  1. 2 (talk · contribs), suggestion box 17:24, 9 February 2009 (UTC) My family is from Barnstable, I went to high school there and still go back for a good part of the year.[reply]
  2. Cape cod naturalist (talk · contribs) 16:32, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Clariosophic (talk · contribs) 03:22, 23 August 2008 (UTC) Interest in Nantucket. Have done a lot of editing and patrolling of Natucket articles.[reply]
  4. dchurbuck (talk · contribs), Cotuit resident, former journalist (Cape Cod Times, Forbes.com); expertise: maritime history, colonial and native history
  5. Hereford (talk · contribs), 18:24, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Grolltech (talk · contribs) 00:27, 6 April 2012 (UTC) Lives in Provincetown.[reply]
  7. ktr101 (talk · contribs), 13:48, June 14, 2008 Creator, live in Marstons Mills, currently maintaining the project
  8. Mikhailov Kusserow (talk · contribs) 11:45, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  9. S1312 (talk · contribs), Live in Mass. 12:23, 22 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Seduisant (talk · contribs), Live nearby. 18:14, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Overlasting Peace (talk · contribs), Resident of Plymouth County. 19:22, 27 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Slugger O'Toole (talk · contribs) 01:55:01, 31 October 2019 (UTC) [reply]
  13. HugeInformation (talk · contribs) 20:31:47, 12 March 2023 (UTC) Librarian @ Jonathan Bourne Public Library  [reply]

Former members

[edit]
  1. ChevreBleue (talk · contribs) 01:43, 18 July 2008 (UTC) - Last edit, February 2011[reply]
  2. Editermaster12345 (talk · contribs) 9:24, 17 November 2010 (UTC) - Last edit, November 2010
  3. Happyandrew1994 (talk · contribs) 02:58, 1 September 2009 (UTC) --Currently in the process of growing up in Marstons Mills - Last edit, April 2010[reply]
  4. Lrsears (talk · contribs) 20:56, 3 May 2009 (UTC) Editor of the Cape Cod Genealogical Society Bulletin, family has lived on the Cape since 1639, I lived in Osterville, Marstons Mills and East Dennis. Interested in the history, geography and genealogy aspects of this project. My daughters went to Barnstable High School and Marstons Mills Middle School. - Last edit, October 2011[reply]
  5. Quissett (talk · contribs) 16:19, 18 July 2008 (UTC), - history, wars, maritime affairs, religion - Last edit, December 2011[reply]
  6. Railfan2103 (talk · contribs) 20:16, 4 September 2011 (UTC) Lives in the general vicinity. Wasn't initally logged in when I posted this; sorry for double edit. - Last edit, December 2011[reply]
  7. Worldviews190 (talk · contribs) 8:26, 12 January 2011 (UTC) Lives in West Harwich, trying to clean up villages of towns on Cape Cod, right now I need help cleaning the aftermath of a edit war on West Harwich and Northwest Harwich. - Last edit, January 2011

Member userbox

[edit]

You may place {{User WikiProject Cape Cod and the Islands}} on your user page to display the following userbox:

This user is a participant in
WikiProject Cape Cod
and the Islands.

This template will add your user page to:

For other Cape Cod and the Islands user templates, please see:

Member Projects

[edit]

Here you can find Cape and Islands related member projects that are in progress or finished.

Templates

[edit]

Page

[edit]
Template Result
{{WikiProject United States|class=|importance=|MA=Yes|MA-importance=|Cape-Cod-Yes|Cape-Cod-importance=}}

Use this template to show an article, image, category, or template is part of this WikiProject. This should be placed at the top of talk pages, not articles.

WikiProject iconUnited States: Massachusetts / Cape Cod and the Islands FA‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
FAThis article has been rated as FA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Massachusetts (assessed as Mid-importance).
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Massachusetts - Cape Cod and the Islands (assessed as High-importance).

User Page

[edit]
Template Result
{{User WikiProject Cape Cod and the Islands}}

Project Members can place this in their infobox

This user is a participant in
WikiProject Cape Cod
and the Islands.
{{User Cape Cod and the Islands}}

Project Members can place this in their infobox

This user lives on
Cape Cod or the Islands.

Recognized content

[edit]

Main page featured articles

[edit]

Kurt Vonnegut (2024-04-11) • Tropical Storm Carrie (1972) (2022-09-04) • Hillary Clinton (2019-08-21) • Ben Affleck (2017-11-17) • Ulysses S. Grant (2015-04-09) • 1991 Perfect Storm (2011-11-01) • Plymouth Colony (2009-10-08) • Hurricane Dog (1950) (2009-01-27) • Judy Garland (2008-06-22) • Jaws (film) (2006-11-29) • Right whale (2006-06-29) • SS Andrea Doria (2005-08-28) • Humpback whale (2004-10-15) • Sperm whale (2004-03-08)

[edit]

1991 Perfect Storm • Ben Affleck • Humpback whale • Hurricane Dog (1950) • Jaws (film) • Kurt Vonnegut • Plymouth Colony • Right whale • Tropical Storm Carrie (1972) • Ulysses S. Grant

[edit]

Hillary Clinton • Judy Garland • SS Andrea Doria • Sperm whale • Summer of '42

[edit]

List of counties in Massachusetts

Good articles

[edit]

26th Infantry Division (United States) • 102nd Intelligence Wing • Bill Keating (politician) • Clarence Ransom Edwards • Dan Wolf • Hurricane Bob • Hurricane Gerda • Jessica Dubroff • Jill Biden • Lalita Tademy • Larry David • Massachusetts • Massachusetts Route 25 • Ted Kennedy • The Narrative of Arthur Gordon Pym of Nantucket

Former good articles

[edit]

George H. W. Bush • Joss Whedon

Did you know? articles

[edit]

Old Harbor U.S. Life Saving Station (2018-09-24) • John Polando (2016-05-18) • Third Cape Cod Canal road bridge (2015-07-28) • Massachusetts (2015-06-30) • Joss Whedon (2014-09-25) • Keith Car & Manufacturing Company (2013-06-23) • Cape Cod Expressway (2013-02-27) • New York Central Tugboat 16 (2013-02-26) • Imperial German plans for the invasion of the United States (2012-12-31) • Jeremiah's Gutter (2012-08-19) • Long Point (Cape Cod) (2012-06-10) • United States lightship LV-117 (2012-04-14) • Coca-Cola Bottling Company of Cape Cod (2011-06-27) • Jenny Lind Tower (2011-02-03) • Geology of Massachusetts (2010-12-12) • Kenneth North (2010-10-16) • Richard B. Sellars (2010-07-05) • Osterville Bay Elementary School (2010-06-21) • Jessica Dubroff (2010-06-19) • Wicked Summer (2010-04-24) • Larinda (2010-04-16) • Siobhan Magnus (2010-03-25) • Enoch Cobb (2010-01-28) • Southside Connector (2010-01-02) • Dave Morey (2009-11-09) • Maria Mitchell Association (2009-09-12) • Nantucket Whaling Museum (2009-07-04) • Nereus (underwater vehicle) (2009-06-17) • Steve Bernard (2009-03-21) • Nobska (steamship) (2008-08-30) • Wasque (2008-08-23) • Common minke whale (2008-07-19) • Pine Hill (Barnstable County, Massachusetts) (2008-07-15) • Mayo Beach Light (2008-06-12) • United States lightship Nantucket (LV-58) (2008-06-04) • Edmund C. Weeks (2008-06-01) • James H. Douglas Jr. (2008-02-24) • USCGC Seneca (1908) (2007-12-11) • USS Barnstable (2007-10-27) • Sankaty (2007-07-18) • Monohansett (steamboat) (2007-07-16) • Atlantic House (2007-01-19) • Harrison Thyng (2006-12-04) • MV Argo Merchant (2006-03-02) • Nicrophorus americanus (2005-09-18) • Mildred Dunnock (2004-12-22)


Assessment instructions

[edit]

Basically since we have so few members, we really can't formulate a review process for everything. A general rule for this project is that if it works for other projects, then it works for us.

An article's assessment is generated from the class parameter in the following project banner: 



The following values may be used for importance:




WikiProject content quality grading scheme






Class
Criteria
Reader's experience
Editing suggestions
Example


    FA
   The article has attained featured article status by passing an in-depth examination by impartial reviewers from WP:Featured article candidates.

      
More detailed criteria

      
The article meets the featured article criteria:

A featured article exemplifies Wikipedia's very best work and is distinguished by professional standards of writing, presentation, and sourcing. In addition to meeting the policies regarding content for all Wikipedia articles, it has the following attributes.



    
 
  1. It is:
  
      
  
    1. well-written: its prose is engaging and of a professional standard;
      2. 
  
    2. comprehensive: it neglects no major facts or details and places the subject in context;
      3. 
  
    3. well-researched:  it is a thorough and representative survey of the relevant literature; claims are verifiable against high-quality reliable sources and are supported by inline citations where appropriate;
      4. 
  
    4. neutral: it presents views fairly and without bias;
      5. 
  
    5. stable: it is not subject to ongoing edit wars and its content does not change significantly from day to day, except in response to the featured article process; and
      6. 
  
    6. compliant with Wikipedia's copyright policy and free of plagiarism or too-close paraphrasing.
      7. 
 
    2. 
 
  2. It follows the style guidelines, including the provision of:
  
      
  
    1. a lead: a concise lead section that summarizes the topic and prepares the reader for the detail in the subsequent sections;
      2. 
  
    2. appropriate structure: a substantial but not overwhelming system of hierarchical section headings; and
      3. 
  
    3. consistent citations: where required by criterion 1c, consistently formatted inline citations using footnotes—see citing sources for suggestions on formatting references. Citation templates are not required.
      4. 
 
    3. 
 
  3. Media. It has images and other media, where appropriate, with succinct captions  and acceptable copyright status. Images follow the image use policy. Non-free images or media must satisfy the criteria for inclusion of non-free content and be labeled accordingly.
    4. 
 
  4. Length. It stays focused on the main topic without going into unnecessary detail and uses summary style where appropriate.
    5. 


     

   Professional, outstanding, and thorough; a definitive source for encyclopedic information.
   No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available; further improvements to the prose quality are often possible.
   Cleopatra
(as of June 2018)		
  

    FL
   The article has attained featured list status by passing an in-depth examination by impartial reviewers from WP:Featured list candidates.

      
More detailed criteria

      
The article meets the featured list criteria:

    
 
  1. Prose. It features professional standards of writing.
    2. 
 
  2. Lead. It has an engaging lead that introduces the subject and defines the scope and inclusion criteria.
    3. 
 
  3. Comprehensiveness.
    4. 
 
  4. Structure. It is easy to navigate and includes, where helpful, section headings and table sort facilities.
    5. 
 
  5. Style. It complies with the Manual of Style and its supplementary pages.
    6. 
 
  6. Stability. It is not the subject of ongoing edit wars and its content does not change significantly from day to day, except in response to the featured list process.
    7. 


     

   Professional standard; it comprehensively covers the defined scope, usually providing a complete set of items, and has annotations that provide useful and appropriate information about those items.
   No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available; further improvements to the prose quality are often possible.
   List of dates predicted for apocalyptic events
(as of May 2018)		
  

    A
   The article is well organized and essentially complete, having been examined by impartial reviewers from a WikiProject or elsewhere. Good article status is not a requirement for A-Class.

      
More detailed criteria

      
The article meets the A-Class criteria:

Provides a well-written, clear and complete description of the topic, as described in Wikipedia:Article development. It should be of a length suitable for the subject, appropriately structured, and be well referenced by a broad array of reliable sources. It should be well illustrated, with no copyright problems. Only minor style issues and other details need to be addressed before submission as a featured article candidate. See the A-Class assessment departments of some of the larger WikiProjects (e.g. WikiProject Military history).

     

   Very useful to readers. A fairly complete treatment of the subject. A non-expert in the subject would typically find nothing wanting.
   Expert knowledge may be needed to tweak the article, and style problems may need solving. WP:Peer review may help.
   Battle of Nam River
(as of June 2014)		
  

    GA
   The article meets all of the good article criteria, and has been examined by one or more impartial reviewers from WP:Good article nominations.

      
More detailed criteria

      
A good article is:

    

  1. Well-written:

      

    1. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct; and
      2. 

    2. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.
      3. 

    2. 

  2. Verifiable with no original research:

      

    1. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline;
      2. 

    2. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose);
      3. 

    3. it contains no original research; and
      4. 

    4. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism.
      5. 

    3. 

  3. Broad in its coverage:

      

    1. it addresses the main aspects of the topic; and
      2. 

    2. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
      3. 

    4. 

  4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
    5. 

  5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
    6. 

  6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:

      

    1. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content; and
      2. 

    2. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.
      3. 

    7. 


     

   Useful to nearly all readers, with no obvious problems; approaching (though not necessarily equalling) the quality of a professional publication.
   Some editing by subject and style experts is helpful; comparison with an existing featured article on a similar topic may highlight areas where content is weak or missing.
   Discovery of the neutron
(as of April 2019)		
  

   B
   The article meets all of the B-Class criteria. It is mostly complete and does not have major problems, but requires some further work to reach good article standards.

      
More detailed criteria

      
    

  1. The article is suitably referenced, with inline citations. It has reliable sources, and any important or controversial material which is likely to be challenged is cited. Any format of inline citation is acceptable: the use of <ref> tags and citation templates such as {{cite web}} is optional.
    2. 

  2. The article reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain obvious omissions or inaccuracies. It contains a large proportion of the material necessary for an A-Class article, although some sections may need expansion, and some less important topics may be missing.
    3. 

  3. The article has a defined structure. Content should be organized into groups of related material, including a lead section and all the sections that can reasonably be included in an article of its kind.
    4. 

  4. The article is reasonably well-written. The prose contains no major grammatical errors and flows sensibly, but does not need to be of the standard of featured articles. The Manual of Style does not need to be followed rigorously.
    5. 

  5. The article contains supporting materials where appropriate. Illustrations are encouraged, though not required. Diagrams, an infobox etc. should be included where they are relevant and useful to the content.
    6. 

  6. The article presents its content in an appropriately understandable way. It is written with as broad an audience in mind as possible. The article should not assume unnecessary technical background and technical terms should be explained or avoided where possible.
    7. 


     

   Readers are not left wanting, although the content may not be complete enough to satisfy a serious student or researcher.
   A few aspects of content and style need to be addressed. Expert knowledge may be needed. The inclusion of supporting materials should be considered if practical, and the article checked for general compliance with the Manual of Style and related style guidelines.
   Psychology
(as of January 2024)		
  

   C
   The article is substantial but is still missing important content or contains irrelevant material. The article should have some references to reliable sources, but may still have significant problems or require substantial cleanup.

      
More detailed criteria

      
The article cites more than one reliable source and is better developed in style, structure, and quality than Start-Class, but it fails one or more of the criteria for B-Class. It may have some gaps or missing elements, or need editing for clarity, balance, or flow.

     

   Useful to a casual reader, but would not provide a complete picture for even a moderately detailed study.
   Considerable editing is needed to close gaps in content and solve cleanup problems.
   Wing
(as of June 2018)		
  

   Start
   An article that is developing but still quite incomplete. It may or may not cite adequate reliable sources.

      
More detailed criteria

      
The article has a meaningful amount of good content, but it is still weak in many areas. The article has one or more of the following:

  • A useful picture or graphic
    • 

  • Multiple links that help explain or illustrate the topic
    • 

  • A subheading that fully treats an element of the topic
    • 

  • Multiple subheadings that indicate material that could be added to complete the article

     

   Provides some meaningful content, but most readers will need more.
   Providing references to reliable sources should come first; the article also needs substantial improvement in content and organisation. Also improve the grammar, spelling, writing style and improve the jargon use.
   Ball
(as of September 2014)		
  

   Stub
   A very basic description of the topic. Meets none of the Start-Class criteria.
   Provides very little meaningful content; may be little more than a dictionary definition. Readers probably see insufficiently developed features of the topic and may not see how the features of the topic are significant.
   Any editing or additional material can be helpful. The provision of meaningful content should be a priority. The best solution for a Stub-class Article to step up to a Start-class Article is to add in referenced reasons of why the topic is significant.
   Lineage (anthropology)
(as of December 2014)		
  

   List
   Meets the criteria of a stand-alone list or set index article, which is an article that contains primarily a list, usually consisting of links to articles in a particular subject area.
   There is no set format for a list, but its organization should be logical and useful to the reader.
   Lists should be lists of live links to Wikipedia articles, appropriately named and organized.
   List of literary movements
  




Statistics
[edit]






Cape Cod and the Islands articles by quality and importance




Quality

Importance




Top

High

Mid

Low

NA

???

Total




 FA

1

1

4

4





10




 FL





1







1




 FM









3



3




 GA

2

1

3

9





15




B

3

16

40

32





91




C

2

15

98

75



2

192




Start



9

314

123



22

468




Stub



1

218

172



1

392




List



3

3

6

1



13




Category









82



82




Disambig









2



2




File









91



91




Project









2



2




Redirect

1

2

12

22

19



56




Template









25



25




Assessed

9

48

693

443

225

25

1,443




Total

9

48

693

443

225

25

1,443




WikiWork factors (?)

ω =  5,763

Ω =  4.93










[edit]


Parent
[edit]



Goals
[edit]


  • Cleanup pages that are related to Cape Cod and the Islands
    • 

  • Merge pages that should be merged
    • 

  • Watch Cape Cod and the Islands pages for vandalism
    • 

  • Expand and create pages for Cape Cod and the Islands personalities
















Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Cape_Cod_and_the_Islands&oldid=1227090660"