Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Assessment/List of Australian George Cross recipients
- The following discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Closed as Promoted EyeSerenetalk 11:49, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
List of Australian George Cross recipients[edit]
- Nominator(s): Abraham, B.S. (talk) 01:12, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
| Toolbox |
|---|
I am nominating this article for A-Class review because I believe it meets the criteria. I just launched this article into the mainspace after several days of working on it in my sandbox, and have hopes of taking it to FL, but thought I would take it through ACR first to see if it is good enough for that. Any and all comments welcome. Thanks, Abraham, B.S. (talk) 01:12, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: The remaining redlinks in the article should all be filled out within the next week or so. Cheers, Abraham, B.S. (talk) 01:25, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comments No problems reported with dab or external links, but the readability tool suggests that their may be too many long sentence in the article. Just something to think about. TomStar81 (Talk) 05:31, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks, Tom. I think the readability tool might be counting the words in the table but not attributing them to a single sentence though, as they words per sentence average seems way to high. Cheers, Abraham, B.S. (talk) 07:18, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support - meets the five criteria for A-Class. The lead section of the list introduces the subject very well; the list is well organized, and refs are reliable. AdjustShift (talk) 17:32, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support I have done some tweaks to the tables: I have forced the column sizes so that they are of equal size. I also forced the dates on to two lines for some so that they didn't wrap. I checked the Gazette links and they all check out (the external link tool doesn't check them). The article meets all the A-Class criteria in my opinion. Good work. Woody (talk) 16:00, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks, Woody. Cheers, Abraham, B.S. (talk) 21:29, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.