Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Assessment/List of active duty United States four-star officers/archive1

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

No consensus to promote at this time - AustralianRupert (talk) via MilHistBot (talk) 03:30, 27 January 2018 (UTC) « Return to A-Class review list[reply]

List of active duty United States four-star officers[edit]

Nominator(s): Neovu79 (talk)

List of active duty United States four-star officers (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I am nominating this list article for A-Class review because I believe this list is well documented and sourced with corresponding portraits of officers. Neovu79 (talk) 05:52, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Oppose Large portions of the article, including the list of officers, are unreferenced at present. I'd suggest withdrawing the nomination until the references are added. The final sections of the article also seem over-long and possibly out of place given the topic of the article, and I'd also suggest greatly streamlining them (for instance, by removing or summarising the various examples). Nick-D (talk) 06:31, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose - As per above, large portions of the actual list are unreferenced. And on immediate glance the analysis of US Laws governing the armed forces appears to be WP:OR. -Indy beetle (talk) 21:27, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak Oppose What an incredibly attractive, well-formatted, and useful list! I have to !vote oppose for now due to the lack of referencing in large sections, however, I hope the primary author completes it with sources as it's a very impressive and robust contribution. Chetsford (talk) 09:15, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Co-ord note: given the above, I intend closing this ACR. I will wait 24 hours, though, in case the nominator wishes to repechage. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 05:55, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
You can close it. I will make the suggested changes and will resubmit for review at a later date. Neovu79 (talk) 14:13, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
No worries, I've triggered Milhistbot now, who will do the behind-the-scenes stuff. All the best for improving the list. Thanks for your efforts so far. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 02:55, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hello @AustralianRupert. How do I re-submit this article for review? Thanks. Neovu79 (talk) 18:23, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.