Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Assessment/SMS Braunschweig

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Article promoted by Ian Rose (talk) via MilHistBot (talk) 19:28, 23 December 2017 (UTC) « Return to A-Class review list

SMS Braunschweig

Nominator(s): Parsecboy (talk)

SMS Braunschweig (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

• Featured article candidates/SMS Braunschweig/archive1

Another one of my German battleship articles (we're nearing the end!) up for A-class review. This ship saw action in World War I at the Battle of the Gulf of Riga, but otherwise had a fairly quiet career that spanned almost 30 years (in the Imperial and Weimar navies). As always, thanks to those who review the article! Parsecboy (talk) 13:27, 11 December 2017 (UTC)

Support Comments

• No DABs
• Lots of duplicate links.
  • While you were out, the standard dupe link checker went haywire - see here for the improved tool. Parsecboy (talk) 01:29, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
    • Thanks for letting me know.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 01:57, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
• Break out propulsion and power sections with appropriate links in the infobox. And tell readers that they're steam engines. And add boilers with links.
  • Done
• Hyphenate triple expansion
  • Done
• Link main battery, secondary armament, flagship
  • Done
• Need a cite for the source of the name.
  • Hildebrand will cover that, but I don't have the book on hand at the moment, so I can't get the exact page number - will get to this later.
    • Added. Parsecboy (talk) 18:52, 17 December 2017 (UTC)
• in Helsinki, Finland and Gothenburg, Sweden commas after Finland and Sweden
  • Done
• Explain the abbreviation VAdm
  • Done
• Nothing else catches my eye on this pass.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 01:26, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
  • Thanks, Sturm. Parsecboy (talk) 16:55, 15 December 2017 (UTC)

Comments by Iazyges

Will start soon. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 20:25, 14 December 2017 (UTC)

CommentsSupport by PM

This article is in great shape. A few comments from me:

• link Displacement (ship)
  • Done
• is information available on the positioning of the TTs?
  • Will have to look, though my guess is that since it's not already in the class article, Groener and Conway's don't specify
• the max and min belt armour differs between the body and infobox
  • Fixed
• her range isn't provided or cited in the body
  • Added to the body
• "named for the Duchy
  • Good catch
• link ship commissioning
  • Done
• "That yeahr"
  • Sturm got that
• Ehrhard Schmidt should probably be just Schmidt on second occasion, per WP:SURNAME
  • Fixed
• repetition "in the Baltic, owing to the threat from submarines in the Baltic" Trim?
  • Fixed
• image review all ok, except for File:SMS Braunschweig NH 47693.tiff, which should probably have the NHHC tag
  • Done

That's me done. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 00:28, 19 December 2017 (UTC)

Thanks, Peacemaker! Parsecboy (talk) 18:34, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

Support by AustralianRupert

G'day, Nate, nice work. I have the following suggestions: AustralianRupert (talk) 13:50, 22 December 2017 (UTC)

• "1921–22" --> "1921–1922" per WP:DATERANGE (in lead and postwar career section)
  • Fixed
• "File:134 Kong Haakon VII forladende Tysk Panserskib Braunschweig - no-nb digifoto 20160209 00511 bldsa PK15135.jpg": would probably look more visually appealing if the border was cropped
  • Good idea - done
• the infobox says the ship was scrapped in 1932, but I couldn't find 1932 mentioned specifically as the date in the article
  • Removed the year
• Citation # 26 "Polmar & Noot, p. 44–45" --> "Polmar & Noot, pp. 44–45"
  • Good catch
• the second entry (Gardiner) in the Further reading section is probably not necessary as it is already in the References
  • Fixed
• there is a slight inconsistency in the hyphenation of the ISBN for the Dodson work (when compared to the other ISBNs)
  • Fixed. Thanks! Parsecboy (talk) 14:56, 22 December 2017 (UTC)

---

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.