Wikipedia:WikiProject Ships/Peer review/Los Angeles class submarine
Looking to get some more eyes on this article. I would preferably like someone other than me to check it for B-class status and look for copy-edit and other mistakes. If editors have time, this article could use some attention from someone in possession of some of the book resources listed on the talk page. That is, of course, above and beyond, but given enough sources this article could easily get to GA status.
- I gave it a copyedit and assessed it as B-class. I have three suggestions. First, the article could use some more citations. Second, there is some redundancy in the Notes and References sections. For example, since the Running Critical book is in the References section, footnote #5 could simply be <ref>Tyler 1986, p. 24, 56, 66-67.</ref> Finally, try to get as much information into your citations as possible— for example, footnote #9 is by John Pike and was written on 10-06-2006. Cheers. HausTalk 00:04, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
Specific sections
[edit]Is there a way that the "in the press" section can be expanded? I'm not sure from memory how many times the class (rather than individual ships shows up in the popular press. That being said, it doesn't feel right leaving out the link the incidents nor does it look good with just that link in there.
Thanks! Protonk (talk) 22:00, 2 May 2008 (UTC)