Alpha Quadrant's PPI Assessment Page[edit]

Alpha Quadrant is classified as a Wikipedia expert.

Rubric[edit]

Assessment area	Scoring methods	Score
Comprehensiveness	Score based on how fully the article covers significant aspects of the topic.	1-10
Sourcing	Score based on adequacy of inline citations and quality of sources relative to what is available.	0-6
Neutrality	Score based on adherence to the Neutral Point of View policy. Scores decline rapidly with any problems with neutrality.	0-3
Readability	Score based on how readable and well-written the article is.	0-3
Formatting	Score based on quality of the article's layout and basic adherence to the Wikipedia Manual of Style	0-2
Illustrations	Score based on how adequately the article is illustrated, within the constraints of acceptable copyright status.	0-2
Total		1-26

Assessment 1, part 1[edit]

The purpose of this evaluation in not to gauge variability in article quality, but to look at the metric itself. How consistent is this assessment tool? and Is there a difference in scores between subject area expert assessment and Wikipedian article assessment?

Drug Policy of the United States (1 July 2010)[edit]

Comprehensiveness = 4
Sourcing = 4
Neutrality = 3
Readability = 2
Illustrations = 1
Formatting = 1
Total = 15

Brown v. Board of Education (1 July 2010)[edit]

Comprehensiveness = 8
Sourcing = 6
Neutrality = 3
Readability = 3
Illustrations = 2
Formatting = 2
Total = 24

Illegal immigrant population of the United States link[edit]

Comprehensiveness = 7
Sourcing = 5
Neutrality = 2
Readability = 2
Illustrations = 2
Formatting = 2
Total = 20

Medicare (United States) link[edit]

Comprehensiveness = 9
Sourcing = 5
Neutrality = 3
Readability = 3
Illustrations = 2
Formatting = 2
Total = 24

Missouri Plan link[edit]

Comprehensiveness = 5
Sourcing = 5
Neutrality = 1
Readability = 5
Illustrations = 0
Formatting = 0
Total = 14

Temporary Assistance for Needy Families link[edit]

Comprehensiveness = 3
Sourcing = 4
Neutrality = 2
Readability = 1
Illustrations = 0
Formatting = 0
Total = 10

War on Drugs link[edit]

Comprehensiveness = 8
Sourcing = 6
Neutrality = 2
Readability = 2
Illustrations = 2
Formatting = 2
Total = 22

Universal health care link[edit]

Comprehensiveness = 6
Sourcing = 5
Neutrality = 1
Readability = 1
Illustrations = 1
Formatting = 1
Total = 15

Assessment 1, Part 2[edit]

Assessment request 2, please use article version from 1 October 2010. There are a couple of rereviews, hopefully those will go fast for you. This set will tie up the first assessment, which tests the quantitative metric and compares Wikipedian assessment to expert assessment.

Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965 link[edit]

Comprehensiveness = 4
Sourcing = 3
Neutrality = 3
Readability = 3
Illustrations = 1
Formatting = 1
Total = 15

Executive Order 11478 link[edit]

Comprehensiveness = 2
Sourcing = 1
Neutrality = 2
Readability = 1
Illustrations = 0
Formatting = 0
Total = 6

Asylum in the United States link[edit]

Comprehensiveness = 8
Sourcing = 3
Neutrality = 2
Readability = 2
Illustrations = 1
Formatting = 1
Total = 17

National Partnership for Reinventing Government link[edit]

Comprehensiveness = 2
Sourcing = 2
Neutrality = 3
Readability = 3
Illustrations = 0
Formatting = 1
Total = 11

Operation Green Sweep link[edit]

Comprehensiveness = 2
Sourcing = 4
Neutrality = 1
Readability = 3
Illustrations = 0
Formatting = 1
Total = 11

State school link[edit]

Comprehensiveness = 6
Sourcing = 2
Neutrality = 2
Readability = 1
Illustrations = 3
Formatting = 0
Total = 14

Brown v. Board of Education link[edit]

Comprehensiveness
Sourcing
Neutrality
Readability
Illustrations
Formatting
Total

Illegal immigrant population of the United States link[edit]

Comprehensiveness
Sourcing
Neutrality
Readability
Illustrations
Formatting
Total

War on Drugs link[edit]

Comprehensiveness
Sourcing
Neutrality
Readability
Illustrations
Formatting
Total