Wikipedia:WikiProject United States Public Policy/Assessment/CanonLawJunkie
CanonLawJunkie's PPI Assessment Page[edit]
CanonLawJunkie is classified as both a public policy expert and a Wikipedia expert.
Assessment 1, part 1[edit]
The purpose of this evaluation in not to gauge variability in article quality, but to look at the metric itself. How consistent is this assessment tool? and Is there a difference in scores between subject area expert assessment and Wikipedian article assessment?
Great Society (14 October 2010)[edit]
- Comprehensiveness: 8/10
- Sourcing: 4/6 or 66.67%
- Neutrality: 3/3 or 100%
- Readability: 2/3 or 66.67%
- Illustrations: 1/2 or 50%
- Formatting: 2/2 or 100%
- Total: 19/26 or 73.08%
Homeland Security Act (23 September 2010)[edit]
- Comprehensiveness: 7/10 or 70%
- Sourcing: 1/6 or 16.67%
- Neutrality: 1/3 or 33.34%
- Readability: 3/3 or 100%
- Illustrations: 0/2 or 0%
- Formatting: 2/2 or 100%
- Total: 14/26 or 53.85%
Equal Access to COBRA Act (24 September 2010)[edit]
- Comprehensiveness: 1/10 or 10%
- Sourcing: 2/6 or 33.34%
- Neutrality: 3/3 or 100%
- Readability: 1/3 or 33.34%
- Illustrations: 0/2 or 0%
- Formatting: 2/2 or 100%
- Total: 9/26 or 34.62%
Reorganization Plan No. 3 (24 September 2010)[edit]
- Comprehensiveness: 3/10 or 30%
- Sourcing: 1/6 or 16.67%
- Neutrality: 3/3 or 100%
- Readability: 3/3 or 100%
- Illustrations: 0/2 or 0%
- Formatting: 2/2 or 100%
- Total 9/26 or 34.62%
Asylum in the United States (1 July 2010)[edit]
- Comprehensiveness
- Sourcing
- Neutrality
- Readability
- Illustrations
- Formatting
- Total
Government Accountability Office (1 July 2010)[edit]
- Comprehensiveness
- Sourcing
- Neutrality
- Readability
- Illustrations
- Formatting
- Total
National Partnership for Reinventing Government (1 July 2010)[edit]
- Comprehensiveness
- Sourcing
- Neutrality
- Readability
- Illustrations
- Formatting
- Total
Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (1 July 2010)[edit]
- Comprehensiveness
- Sourcing
- Neutrality
- Readability
- Illustrations
- Formatting
- Total
Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965 (1 July 2010)[edit]
- Comprehensiveness
- Sourcing
- Neutrality
- Readability
- Illustrations
- Formatting
- Total
Assessment 1, Part 2[edit]
Assessment request 2, please use article version from 1 October 2010. There are a couple of rereviews, hopefully those will go fast for you. This set will tie up the first assessment, which tests the quantitative metric and compares Wikipedian assessment to expert assessment. Sorry the article titles don't link to the correct article version, I will do this in the future.
Monetary policy of the United States[edit]
comprehensiveness: 7/10 or 70%
sourcing: 5/6 or 83.33%
neutrality: 2/3 or 66.66%
readability: 1/3 or 33.33%
formatting: 2/2 or 100%
illustrations: 0/2 or 0%
Drug policy of the United States[edit]
Comprehensiveness: 4/10 or 40%
Sourcing: 4/6 or 66.67%
Neutrality: 3/3 or 100%
Readability: 2/3 or 66.67%
Formatting: 2/2 or 100%
Illustrations: 0/2 or 0%
Brown v. Board of Education[edit]
Fly America Act[edit]
Medicare (United States)[edit]
Missouri Plan[edit]
Reorganization Plan No. 3[edit]
- Comprehensiveness: 4/10 or 40%
- Sourcing: 1/6 or 16.67%
- Neutrality: 3/3 or 100%
- Readability: 3/3 or 100%
- Illustrations: 0/2 or 0%
- Formatting: 2/2 or 100%
- Total: 10/26 or 38.46%