Wikipedia talk:Article of the Month
What on earth[edit]
What on earth is the point of this, other than more bureaucracy and red tape? There exists no objective way of stating that any featured article is better than any other. >Radiant< 10:51, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
- Sure, and voting is evil. Plus the fact that the quality of one FA should be no different from the quality of any other. Moreschi Talk 14:24, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
- All FAs are equal. Some are more equal than others. Luigi30 (Taλk) 14:56, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
- The bulk of the discussion on this initiative can be found at Wikipedia talk:Article of the week. In the interest of keeping all comments in one place, you might want to continue this discussion over there. Thanks! --Plek 22:17, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
- All FAs are equal. Some are more equal than others. Luigi30 (Taλk) 14:56, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
Suggest redirect and merge[edit]
See my comments at Wikipedia_talk:Article_of_the_week#Article_of_the_Year.3F. Carcharoth 16:05, 2 May 2007 (UTC)